Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Timothy Maxwell
dblp:130/9153 · also Tim Maxwell
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Language models and text generation · 100% | |
| Network and information security
1 paper |
Security and privacy of machine learning · 100% |
Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
alignment |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Towards Understanding Sycophancy in Language Models · ICLR 2024 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
large language model safety |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Many-shot Jailbreaking · NeurIPS 2024 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › alignment
sycophancy |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Towards Understanding Sycophancy in Language Models · ICLR 2024 |
Security and privacy of machine learning
adversarial attack |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Many-shot Jailbreaking · NeurIPS 2024 |
Security and privacy of machine learning › adversarial attack
jailbreak attack |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Many-shot Jailbreaking · NeurIPS 2024 |
Security and privacy of machine learning
prompt injection |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Many-shot Jailbreaking · NeurIPS 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
long-context prompting · 1.5in-context learning · 1.5reinforcement learning from human feedback · 0.8preference modeling · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Towards Understanding Sycophancy in Language ModelsabstractReinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF) is a popular technique for training high-quality AI assistants. However, RLHF may also encourage model responses that match user beliefs over truthful responses, a behavior known as sycophancy. We investigate the prevalence of sycophancy in RLHF-trained models and whether human preference judgments are responsible. We first demonstrate that five state-of-the-art AI assistants consistently exhibit sycophancy behavior across four varied free-form text-generation tasks. To understand if human preferences drive this broadly observed behavior of RLHF models, we analyze existing human preference data. We find that when a response matches a user's views, it is more likely to be preferred. Moreover, both humans and preference models (PMs) prefer convincingly-written sycophantic responses over correct ones a non-negligible fraction of the time. Optimizing model outputs against PMs also sometimes sacrifices truthfulness in favor of sycophancy. Overall, our results indicate that sycophancy is a general behavior of RLHF models, likely driven in part by human preference judgments favoring sycophantic responses. Mrinank Sharma, Meg Tong, Tomasz Korbak, David Duvenaud, Amanda Askell, Samuel R. Bowman, Esin Durmus, Zac Hatfield-Dodds, Scott R. Johnston, Shauna Kravec, Timothy Maxwell, Sam McCandlish, Kamal Ndousse, Oliver Rausch, Nicholas Schiefer, Miranda Zhang, Ethan Perez |
ICLR | 11 |
| 2024 | Many-shot JailbreakingabstractWe investigate a family of simple long-context attacks on large language models: prompting with hundreds of demonstrations of undesirable behavior. This attack is newly feasible with the larger context windows recently deployed by language model providers like Google DeepMind, OpenAI and Anthropic. We find that in diverse, realistic circumstances, the effectiveness of this attack follows a power law, up to hundreds of shots. We demonstrate the success of this attack on the most widely used state-of-the-art closed-weight models, and across various tasks. Our results suggest very long contexts present a rich new attack surface for LLMs. Cem Anil, Esin Durmus, Nina Panickssery, Mrinank Sharma, Joe Benton, Sandipan Kundu, Joshua Batson, Meg Tong, Jesse Mu, Daniel Ford, Francesco Mosconi, Rajashree Agrawal, Rylan Schaeffer, Naomi Bashkansky, Samuel Svenningsen, Mike Lambert, Ansh Radhakrishnan, Carson Denison, Evan Hubinger, Yuntao Bai, Trenton Bricken, Timothy Maxwell, Nicholas Schiefer, James Sully, Alex Tamkin, Tamera Lanham, Karina Nguyen, Tomek Korbak, Jared Kaplan, Deep Ganguli, Samuel R. Bowman, Ethan Perez, Roger B. Grosse, David Duvenaud |
NeurIPS | 22 |
| 2001 | Development of a hybrid electric sport utility vehicleabstractThis paper describes the design, fabrication, and test results of the conversion of a General Motors Suburban into a hybrid electric vehicle (HEV). A parallel drive train configuration is utilized with an internal combustion engine running on reformulated gasoline and two electric motors. The overall system is monitored and controlled by a real-time control system. One objective in the design was to minimize changes in the Suburban. design decisions, expected results and actual results are presented. Micheal E. Parten, Timothy Maxwell |
VTC Fall | 2 |
| 2001 | Development of a PEM fuel cell vehicleabstractThis paper describes the development of a proton exchange membrane (PEM) fuel cell powered vehicle. The vehicle is a converted Suburban with a series hybrid electric configuration. The auxiliary power unit is a PEM fuel cell that is used to power the vehicle and charge the batteries when cruising. System requirements and design decisions are presented. Micheal E. Parten, Timothy Maxwell |
VTC Fall | 2 |