Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Gregg R. Rabideau
dblp:131/1519
· DBLP profile ↗
11ranked-venue papers
1as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
0009-0000-1293-1353ORCID · verified
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 9 · 1 first-author · 3 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 3Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 3 · 1 since 2021Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 2Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Distributed systems · 100% | |
| Artificial intelligence
4 papers |
Planning, search and constraint satisfaction · 91% Motion planning and robot control · 7% Multi-agent systems · 2% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Mathematical optimization · 100% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
3 papers |
Computational science and engineering · 100% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Distributed systems › distributed scheduling
data transfer scheduling |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | An Efficient Approach to Data Transfer Scheduling for Long Range Space Exploration · IJCAI 2022 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction
scheduling |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | Activity-Based Scheduling of Science Campaigns for the Rosetta Orbiter · IJCAI 2015 |
Mathematical optimization
scheduling |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | An Efficient Approach to Data Transfer Scheduling for Long Range Space Exploration · IJCAI 2022 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction
planning and scheduling |
0.0 | 2 | 1999 | Automating Planning and Scheduling of Shuttle Payload Operations · Artif. Intell. 1999 Automated Planning and Scheduling for Planetary Rover Distributed Operations · ICRA 1999 |
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
path planning |
0.0 | 1 | 1999 | Automated Planning and Scheduling for Planetary Rover Distributed Operations · ICRA 1999 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
sweep algorithm · 1.1randomized heuristics · 1.1constraint-based scheduling · 0.4path planning · 0.0automated scheduling · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Scheduling Data Transfers in Space Missions with Priorities and InterruptionsabstractIn deep space missions, scientific data generated by onboard instruments must be temporarily stored in local memory buffers before being downlinked to Earth during limited communication windows. Efficient scheduling of these data transfers is essential to prevent buffer overflows and data loss, particularly in the presence of uncertainties. Previous work has considered the overlapping Memory Dumping Problem (oMDP), which consists in assigning transfer priorities to the memory buffers and minimize the peaks memory usage, which reduces the risk of overflow. In this paper, we consider a dditional decisions in the transfer plans that are implementable in practice: data transfer from each buffer can be interrupted after a given time, once per downlink window, preventing it from dumping data until the next window, but redistributing the unused bandwidth to the other buffers. The new problem is called oMDPi (oMDP with interruptions). We obtain new complexity results, showing that oMDPi is NP-complete for at least two windows. While the complexity status of the single window oMDPi remains open, we propose a polynomial-time heuristic to solve it. We propose a hybrid heuristic to solve the general oMDPi, embedding a flow relaxation and a single window heuristic. The results on both real and realistic generated instances show that our heuristic achieves a significant reduction of memory peaks in a reasonable time compared to previous works, making the new policy attractive for future space missions. Julien Rouzot, Christian Artigues, Philippe Garnier, Emmanuel Hebrard, Pierre Lopez 0001, A. Maillard, Gregg R. Rabideau |
ICTAI | 7 |
| 2025 | Planning, Scheduling, and Execution on the Moon: The CADRE Technology Demonstration Mission
Gregg R. Rabideau, Joseph A. Russino, Andrew Branch, Nihal Dhamani, Tiago Stegun Vaquero, Steve A. Chien, Jean-Pierre de la Croix, Federico Rossi 0001 |
AAMAS | 1 |
| 2022 | An Efficient Approach to Data Transfer Scheduling for Long Range Space ExplorationabstractLong range space missions, such as Rosetta, require robust plans of data-acquisition activities and of the resulting data transfers. In this paper we revisit the problem of assigning priorities to data transfers in order to maximize safety margin of onboard memory. We propose a fast sweep algorithm to verify the feasibility of a given priority assignment and we introduce an efficient exact algorithm to assign priorities on a single downlink window. We prove that the problem is NP-hard for several windows, and we propose several randomized heuristics to tackle the general case. Our experimental results show that the proposed approaches are able to improve the plans computed for the real mission by the previously existing method, while the sweep algorithm yields drastic accelerations. Emmanuel Hebrard, Christian Artigues, Pierre Lopez 0001, Arnaud Lusson, Steve A. Chien, Adrien Maillard, Gregg R. Rabideau |
IJCAI | 7 |
| 2015 | Activity-Based Scheduling of Science Campaigns for the Rosetta Orbiter
Steve A. Chien, Gregg R. Rabideau, Daniel Tran, Martina Troesch, Joshua Doubleday, Federico Nespoli, Miguel Perez Ayucar, Marc Costa Sitja, Claire Vallat, Bernhard Geiger, Nico Altobelli, Manuel Fernandez, Fran Vallejo, Rafael Andres, Michael Kueppers |
IJCAI | 2 |
| 2005 | An autonomous Earth observing sensorwebabstractWe describe a network of sensors linked by software and the Internet to an autonomous satellite observation response capability. This system of systems is designed with a flexible, modular, architecture to facilitate expansion in sensors, customization of trigger conditions, and customization of responses. This system has been used to implement a global surveillance program of science phenomena including: volcanoes, flooding, cryosphere events, and atmospheric phenomena. In this paper we describe the importance of the earth observing sensorweb application as well as overall architecture for the system of systems. Steve A. Chien, Benjamin Cichy, Ashley Davies, Daniel Tran, Gregg R. Rabideau, Rebecca Castaño, Rob Sherwood, Son V. Nghiem, Ronald Greeley, Thomas Doggett, Victor R. Baker, James M. Dohm, Felipe Ip, Dan Mandl, Stuart Frye, Seth Shulman, Stephen G. Ungar, Thomas Brakke, Jacques Descloitres, Jeremy Jones, Sandy Grosvenor, Rob Wright, Luke Flynn, Andy Harris, G. Robert Brakenridge, Sebastien Cacquard |
SMC | 5 |
| 2005 | The autonomous sciencecraft embedded systems architectureabstractAn Autonomous Science Agent has been flying onboard the Earth Observing One spacecraft since 2003. This software enables the spacecraft to autonomously detect and responds to science events occurring on the Earth such as volcanoes, flooding, and snow melt. This agent includes artificial intelligence software systems that perform science data analysis, deliberative planning, and run-time robust execution. This software is in routine use to fly the EO-1 mission. In this paper we discuss the architecture used to integrate these systems and lessons learned from its multi-year flight on EO-1. Steve A. Chien, Rob Sherwood, Daniel Tran, Benjamin Cichy, Gregg R. Rabideau, Rebecca Castaño, Ashley Davies, Stuart Frye, Bruce Trout, Jeff D'Agostino, Seth Shulman, Dan Mandl, Darrell Boyer, Sandra C. Hayden, Adam Sweet, Scott Christa |
SMC | 5 |
| 2004 | The Autonomous Sciencecraft Experiment Onboard the EO-1 Spacecraft
Daniel Tran, Steve A. Chien, Rob Sherwood, Rebecca Castaño, Benjamin Cichy, Ashley Davies, Gregg R. Rabideau |
AAAI | 7 |
| 2001 | Using abstraction to coordinate multiple robotic spacecraftabstractThe trend toward multiple-spacecraft missions requires autonomous teams of spacecraft to coordinate their activities when sharing limited resources. The paper describes how an iterative repair planner/scheduler can reason about the activities of multiple spacecraft at abstract levels in order to greatly improve the scheduling of their use of shared resources. By finding consistent schedules at abstract levels, refinement choices can be preserved for use in robust plan execution systems. We present an algorithm for summarizing the metric resource requirements of an abstract activity based on the resource usages of its potential refinements. We find that reasoning about this summary information and that of state constraints can offer exponential improvements in the time to find consistent schedules with an iterative repair planner. We analytically describe the conditions under which these improvements are made and show that sometimes the extra overhead involved does not warrant their use. We apply these techniques within the ASPEN planner/scheduler to a domain where a team of rovers must coordinate their schedules to avoid conflicts over shared resources. Experiments using the ASPEN planner/scheduler in a Mars multi-rover domain support our analyses and compare techniques for controlling decomposition. Bradley J. Clement, Anthony C. Barrett, Gregg R. Rabideau, Edmund H. Durfee |
IROS | 3 |
| 2001 | Autonomously generating operations sequences for a Mars rover using AI-based planningabstractThis paper discusses a proof-of-concept prototype for ground-based automatic generation of validated rover command sequences. This prototype is based on ASPEN (Automated Scheduling and Planning Environment). This Artificial Intelligence (AI) based planning and scheduling system will automatically generate a command sequence that will execute: within resource constraints and satisfy flight rules. An automated planning and scheduling system encodes rover design knowledge and uses the search and reasoning techniques to automatically generate low-level command sequences while respecting the rover operability constraints. This prototype planning system has been field-tested using the Rocky-7 rover at JPL, and will be field-tested on more complex rovers to prove its effectiveness before transferring the technology to flight operations for an upcoming NASA mission. The goal-driven commanding of planetary rovers greatly reduces the requirements for highly skilled rover engineering personnel. This in turn greatly reduces mission operations costs and permits a faster response to changes in rover states. Rob Sherwood, Andrew Mishkin, Tara A. Estlin, Steve A. Chien, Paul Backes, Jeffrey S. Norris, Brian K. Cooper, Scott Maxwell, Gregg R. Rabideau |
IROS | 9 |
| 1999 | Automated Planning and Scheduling for Planetary Rover Distributed OperationsabstractAutomated planning and scheduling, including automated path planning, has been integrated with an Internet-based distributed operations system for planetary rover operations. The resulting prototype system enables faster generation of valid rover command sequences by a distributed planetary rover operations team. The Web Interface for Telescience provides Internet-based distributed collaboration, the automated scheduling and planning environment provides automated planning and scheduling, and an automated path planner provides path planning. The system was demonstrated on the Rocky7 research rover at JPL. Paul Backes, Gregg R. Rabideau, Kam S. Tso, Steve A. Chien |
ICRA | 2 |
| 1999 | Automating Planning and Scheduling of Shuttle Payload Operations
Steve A. Chien, Gregg R. Rabideau, Jason Willis, Tobias Mann |
Artif. Intell. | 2 |