Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Carl A. Miller
dblp:131/6874
· DBLP profile ↗
6ranked-venue papers
4as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
0000-0003-1917-1531ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Theory of computation · 4 · 3 first-authorSecurity and privacy · 1 · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Network and information security
6 papers |
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis · 63% Cryptographic protocols and secure computation · 37% | |
| Theoretical computer science
4 papers |
Quantum computing and quantum information · 100% |
Topics — the 14 heaviest of 15, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Quantum computing and quantum information
quantum cryptography |
1.2 | 4 | 2020 | Parallel Device-Independent Quantum Key Distribution · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2020 The impossibility of efficient quantum weak coin flipping · STOC 2020 Universal Security for Randomness Expansion from the Spot-Checking Protocol · SIAM J. Comput. 2017 |
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis › post-quantum cryptography › lattice-based cryptography
dilithium |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Evaluating the Security of CRYSTALS-Dilithium in the Quantum Random Oracle Model · EUROCRYPT (6) 2024 |
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis › public-key cryptography › digital signatures › post-quantum signatures
lattice-based signatures |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Evaluating the Security of CRYSTALS-Dilithium in the Quantum Random Oracle Model · EUROCRYPT (6) 2024 |
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis
post-quantum cryptography |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Evaluating the Security of CRYSTALS-Dilithium in the Quantum Random Oracle Model · EUROCRYPT (6) 2024 |
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis › random oracle model
quantum random oracle model |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Evaluating the Security of CRYSTALS-Dilithium in the Quantum Random Oracle Model · EUROCRYPT (6) 2024 |
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis › quantum cryptography › randomness expansion
device-independent randomness expansion |
0.4 | 2 | 2016 | Robust Protocols for Securely Expanding Randomness and Distributing Keys Using Untrusted Quantum Devices · J. ACM 2016 Robust protocols for securely expanding randomness and distributing keys using untrusted quantum devices · STOC 2014 |
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation › key management
key distribution |
0.4 | 2 | 2016 | Robust Protocols for Securely Expanding Randomness and Distributing Keys Using Untrusted Quantum Devices · J. ACM 2016 Robust protocols for securely expanding randomness and distributing keys using untrusted quantum devices · STOC 2014 |
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis › quantum cryptography
randomness expansion |
0.4 | 2 | 2016 | Robust Protocols for Securely Expanding Randomness and Distributing Keys Using Untrusted Quantum Devices · J. ACM 2016 Robust protocols for securely expanding randomness and distributing keys using untrusted quantum devices · STOC 2014 |
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation
coin flipping |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | The impossibility of efficient quantum weak coin flipping · STOC 2020 |
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation
key exchange |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Parallel Device-Independent Quantum Key Distribution · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2020 |
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation › coin flipping
weak coin flipping |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | The impossibility of efficient quantum weak coin flipping · STOC 2020 |
Quantum computing and quantum information › quantum cryptography
quantum coin flipping |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | The impossibility of efficient quantum weak coin flipping · STOC 2020 |
Quantum computing and quantum information › quantum cryptography
quantum key distribution |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Parallel Device-Independent Quantum Key Distribution · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2020 |
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation › key management › key distribution
quantum key distribution |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Robust Protocols for Securely Expanding Randomness and Distributing Keys Using Untrusted Quantum Devices · J. ACM 2016 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
uncertainty principle · 1.3security proof · 0.9multiplayer game analysis · 0.9quantum random oracle model · 0.8spot-checking protocol · 0.6rényi divergence · 0.5schatten norms · 0.3schatten norm · 0.3renyi divergence · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Evaluating the Security of CRYSTALS-Dilithium in the Quantum Random Oracle Model
Kelsey A. Jackson, Carl A. Miller, Daochen Wang |
EUROCRYPT (6) | 2 |
| 2020 | The impossibility of efficient quantum weak coin flippingabstractHow can two parties with competing interests carry out a fair coin flip across a quantum communication channel? This problem (quantum weak coin-flipping) was formalized more than 15 years ago, and, despite some phenomenal theoretical progress, practical quantum coin-flipping protocols with vanishing bias have proved hard to find. In the current work we show that there is a reason that practical weak quantum coin-flipping is difficult: any quantum weak coin-flipping protocol with bias є must use at least exp( Ω (1/√є )) rounds of communication. This is a large improvement over the previous best known lower bound of Ω ( log log(1/є )) due to Ambainis from 2004. Our proof is based on a theoretical construction (the two-variable profile function) which may find further applications. Carl A. Miller |
STOC | 1 |
| 2020 | Parallel Device-Independent Quantum Key DistributionabstractA prominent application of quantum cryptography is the distribution of cryptographic keys that are provably secure. Such security proofs were extended by Vazirani and Vidick (Physical Review Letters, 113, 140501, 2014) to the deviceindependent (DI) scenario, where the users do not need to trust the integrity of the underlying quantum devices. The protocols analyzed by them and by subsequent authors all require a sequential execution of N multiplayer games, where N is the security parameter. In this work, we prove the security of a protocol where all games are executed in parallel. Besides decreasing the number of time-steps necessary for key generation, this result reduces the security requirements for DI-QKD by allowing arbitrary information leakage of each user's inputs within his or her lab. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first parallel security proof for a fully device-independent QKD protocol. Our protocol tolerates a constant level of device imprecision and achieves a linear key rate. Rahul Jain 0001, Carl A. Miller, Yaoyun Shi |
IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory | 2 |
| 2017 | Universal Security for Randomness Expansion from the Spot-Checking ProtocolabstractColbeck [ Ph.D. thesis, 2006] proposed using Bell inequality violations to generate certified random numbers. While full quantum-security proofs have been given, it remains a major open problem to identify the broadest class of Bell inequalities and lowest performance requirements to achieve such security. In this paper, working within the broad class of spot-checking protocols, we prove exactly which Bell inequality violations can be used to achieve full security. Our result greatly improves the known noise tolerance for secure randomness expansion: for the commonly used CHSH game, full security was only known with a noise tolerance of 1.5% [Miller and Shi, J. ACM, 63 (2016), 33], and we improve this to 10.3%. We also generalize our results beyond Bell inequalities and give the first security proof for randomness expansion based on Kochen--Specker inequalities. The central technical contribution of the paper is a new uncertainty principle for the Schatten norm, which is based on the uniform convexity inequality of Ball, Carlen, and Lieb [ Invent. Math., 115 (1994), pp. 463--482]. Carl A. Miller, Yaoyun Shi |
SIAM J. Comput. | 1 |
| 2016 | Robust Protocols for Securely Expanding Randomness and Distributing Keys Using Untrusted Quantum DevicesabstractRandomness is a vital resource for modern-day information processing, especially for cryptography. A wide range of applications critically rely on abundant, high-quality random numbers generated securely. Here, we show how to expand a random seed at an exponential rate without trusting the underlying quantum devices. Our approach is secure against the most general adversaries, and has the following new features: cryptographic level of security, tolerating a constant level of imprecision in devices, requiring only unit size quantum memory (for each device component) in an honest implementation, and allowing a large natural class of constructions for the protocol. In conjunction with a recent work by Chung et al. [2014], it also leads to robust unbounded expansion using just 2 multipart devices. When adapted for distributing cryptographic keys, our method achieves, for the first time, exponential expansion combined with cryptographic security and noise tolerance. The proof proceeds by showing that the Rényi divergence of the outputs of the protocol (for a specific bounding operator) decreases linearly as the protocol iterates. At the heart of the proof are a new uncertainty principle on quantum measurements and a method for simulating trusted measurements with untrusted devices. Carl A. Miller, Yaoyun Shi |
J. ACM | 1 |
| 2014 | Robust protocols for securely expanding randomness and distributing keys using untrusted quantum devicesabstractRandomness is a vital resource for modern day information processing, especially for cryptography. A wide range of applications critically rely on abundant, high quality random numbers generated securely. Here we show how to expand a random seed at an exponential rate without trusting the underlying quantum devices. Our approach is secure against the most general adversaries, and has the following new features: tolerating a constant level of implementation imprecision, requiring only a unit size quantum memory per device component for the honest implementation, and allowing a large natural class of constructions. In conjunct with a recent work by Chung, Shi and Wu (QIP 2014), it leads to robust unbounded expansion using just 2 multi-part devices. It can also be adapted for distributing cryptographic keys securely. The proof begins with a known protocol and proceeds by showing that the Renyi divergence of the outputs of the protocol (for a specific bounding operator) decreases linearly as the protocol iterates. At the heart of the proof are a new uncertainty principle on quantum measurements, and a method for simulating trusted measurements with untrusted devices. A full version of this paper containing additional results developed after the conference submission is available as arXiv:1402.0489. Carl A. Miller, Yaoyun Shi |
STOC | 1 |