Ravi Agarwal

dblp:131/8235 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 2 · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
2 papers
Integrated circuit design · 89% Electronic design automation · 11%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Integrated circuit design › heterogeneous integration
chiplet integration
0.912025
Glass Interposer Integration of Logic and Memory Chiplets: PPA and Power/Signal Integrity Benefits · IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 2025
Integrated circuit design
heterogeneous integration
0.912025
Glass Interposer Integration of Logic and Memory Chiplets: PPA and Power/Signal Integrity Benefits · IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 2025
Integrated circuit design
packaging
0.912025
Glass Interposer Integration of Logic and Memory Chiplets: PPA and Power/Signal Integrity Benefits · IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 2025
Integrated circuit design
3d integration
0.712023
Glass Interposer Integration of Logic and Memory Chiplets: PPA and Power/Signal Integrity Benefits · DAC 2023
Electronic design automation
power integrity
0.212023
Glass Interposer Integration of Logic and Memory Chiplets: PPA and Power/Signal Integrity Benefits · DAC 2023
Electronic design automation
signal integrity
0.212023
Glass Interposer Integration of Logic and Memory Chiplets: PPA and Power/Signal Integrity Benefits · DAC 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

signal integrity analysis · 0.9power integrity analysis · 0.9chiplet/package co-design · 0.9sign-off simulation · 0.7GDS layout · 0.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Glass Interposer Integration of Logic and Memory Chiplets: PPA and Power/Signal Integrity Benefits
abstract
Glass interposers have become a compelling option for 2.5-D heterogeneous integration compared to silicon. It allows 3-D stacking configuration between the embedded dies and the conventional flip-chip dies mounted directly on top at low cost. Furthermore, the interconnect pitch and through-glass-via (TGV) diameter in glass are becoming comparable to their counterparts in silicon. In this study, we investigate the power, performance, area (PPA), signal integrity (SI) and power integrity (PI) advantages of 3-D stacking afforded by glass interposers over silicon interposers. Our research employs a chiplet/package co-design approach, progressing from an register-transfer-level description of RISC-V chiplets to final graphic data system (GDS) layouts, utilizing TSMC 28 nm for chiplets and Georgia Tech’s 3-D glass packaging for the interposer. Compared to silicon, glass interposers offer a$2.6\times $reduction in area, a$21\times $reduction in wire length, a 17.72% reduction in full-chip power consumption, a 64.7% increase in SI and a$10\times $improvement in PI, with a 35% increase in thermal. Furthermore, we provide a detailed comparative analysis with 3-D Silicon technologies. It not only highlights the competitive advantages of glass interposers, but also provides critical insights into each design’s potential limitations and optimization opportunities.
Pruek Vanna-Iampikul, Seungmin Woo, Serhat Erdogan, Lingjun Zhu, Mohanalingam Kathaperumal, Ravi Agarwal, Ram Gupta, Kevin Rinebold, Madhavan Swaminathan, Sung Kyu Lim
IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst.6
2023 Glass Interposer Integration of Logic and Memory Chiplets: PPA and Power/Signal Integrity Benefits
abstract
Glass interposers enable 3D stacking between the chiplets embedded into the substrate and the ones stacked directly on top, which is not possible in silicon. In this work, we demonstrate the benefits of such stacking in glass interposers over silicon in terms of key system-level metrics including area, wirelength, signal, power, and thermal integrity. We achieve this goal with GDS layouts of both chiplets and interposers and sign-off simulations. Our experiments show that glass offers 2.6X area, 21X wirelength, 17.72% full-chip power, 64.7% signal integrity, and 10X power integrity improvement over silicon at the cost of 15% increase in temperature.
Pruek Vanna-Iampikul, Lingjun Zhu, Serhat Erdogan, Mohanalingam Kathaperumal, Ravi Agarwal, Ram Gupta, Kevin Rinebold, Sung Kyu Lim
DAC5