EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Noa Liscovitch
dblp:131/9791
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2017
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 3 · 2 first-authorArtificial intelligence and machine learning · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Bioinformatics and computational biology
gene expression analysis |
0.2 | 1 | 2013 | FuncISH: learning a functional representation of neural ISH images · Bioinform. 2013 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › bioimage informatics › tissue image analysis
in situ hybridization image analysis |
0.2 | 1 | 2013 | FuncISH: learning a functional representation of neural ISH images · Bioinform. 2013 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › neuroscience
neuroinformatics |
0.2 | 1 | 2013 | FuncISH: learning a functional representation of neural ISH images · Bioinform. 2013 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › gene expression analysis › gene expression pattern analysis
spatial gene expression pattern analysis |
0.2 | 1 | 2013 | FuncISH: learning a functional representation of neural ISH images · Bioinform. 2013 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
histogram of local descriptors · 0.2functional annotation prediction · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 | DeepBrain: Functional Representation of Neural In-Situ Hybridization Images for Gene Ontology Classification Using Deep Convolutional Autoencoders
Ido Cohen 0002, Eli David, Nathan S. Netanyahu, Noa Liscovitch, Gal Chechik |
ICANN (2) | 4 |
| 2013 | FuncISH: learning a functional representation of neural ISH imagesabstractMOTIVATION: High-spatial resolution imaging datasets of mammalian brains have recently become available in unprecedented amounts. Images now reveal highly complex patterns of gene expression varying on multiple scales. The challenge in analyzing these images is both in extracting the patterns that are most relevant functionally and in providing a meaningful representation that allows neuroscientists to interpret the extracted patterns. RESULTS: Here, we present FuncISH--a method to learn functional representations of neural in situ hybridization (ISH) images. We represent images using a histogram of local descriptors in several scales, and we use this representation to learn detectors of functional (GO) categories for every image. As a result, each image is represented as a point in a low-dimensional space whose axes correspond to meaningful functional annotations. The resulting representations define similarities between ISH images that can be easily explained by functional categories. We applied our method to the genomic set of mouse neural ISH images available at the Allen Brain Atlas, finding that most neural biological processes can be inferred from spatial expression patterns with high accuracy. Using functional representations, we predict several gene interaction properties, such as protein-protein interactions and cell-type specificity, more accurately than competing methods based on global correlations. We used FuncISH to identify similar expression patterns of GABAergic neuronal markers that were not previously identified and to infer new gene function based on image-image similarities. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online. Noa Liscovitch, Uri Shalit, Gal Chechik |
Bioinform. | 1 |
| 2013 | Specialization of Gene Expression during Mouse Brain DevelopmentabstractThe transcriptome of the brain changes during development, reflecting processes that determine functional specialization of brain regions. We analyzed gene expression, measured using in situ hybridization across the full developing mouse brain, to quantify functional specialization of brain regions. Surprisingly, we found that during the time that the brain becomes anatomically regionalized in early development, transcription specialization actually decreases reaching a low, "neurotypic", point around birth. This decrease of specialization is brain-wide, and mainly due to biological processes involved in constructing brain circuitry. Regional specialization rises again during post-natal development. This effect is largely due to specialization of plasticity and neural activity processes. Post-natal specialization is particularly significant in the cerebellum, whose expression signature becomes increasingly different from other brain regions. When comparing mouse and human expression patterns, the cerebellar post-natal specialization is also observed in human, but the regionalization of expression in the human Thalamus and Cortex follows a strikingly different profile than in mouse. Noa Liscovitch, Gal Chechik |
PLoS Comput. Biol. | 1 |
| 2012 | Localizing Genes to Cerebellar Layers by Classifying ISH ImagesabstractGene expression controls how the brain develops and functions. Understanding control processes in the brain is particularly hard since they involve numerous types of neurons and glia, and very little is known about which genes are expressed in which cells and brain layers. Here we describe an approach to detect genes whose expression is primarily localized to a specific brain layer and apply it to the mouse cerebellum. We learn typical spatial patterns of expression from a few markers that are known to be localized to specific layers, and use these patterns to predict localization for new genes. We analyze images of in-situ hybridization (ISH) experiments, which we represent using histograms of local binary patterns (LBP) and train image classifiers and gene classifiers for four layers of the cerebellum: the Purkinje, granular, molecular and white matter layer. On held-out data, the layer classifiers achieve accuracy above 94% (AUC) by representing each image at multiple scales and by combining multiple image scores into a single gene-level decision. When applied to the full mouse genome, the classifiers predict specific layer localization for hundreds of new genes in the Purkinje and granular layers. Many genes localized to the Purkinje layer are likely to be expressed in astrocytes, and many others are involved in lipid metabolism, possibly due to the unusual size of Purkinje cells. Lior Kirsch, Noa Liscovitch, Gal Chechik |
PLoS Comput. Biol. | 2 |