Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Zachary Remscrim

dblp:132/3041 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
3as first author
2since 2021 · last 2021
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Theory of computation · 4 · 3 first-author · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
3 papers
Computational complexity · 46% Quantum computing and quantum information · 39% Automata and formal languages · 11%

Topics — the 11 heaviest of 12, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Quantum computing and quantum information
quantum circuit
0.512021
Eliminating intermediate measurements in space-bounded Quantum computation · STOC 2021
Quantum computing and quantum information
quantum complexity theory
0.512021
Eliminating intermediate measurements in space-bounded Quantum computation · STOC 2021
Quantum computing and quantum information › quantum complexity theory
space-bounded quantum computation
0.512021
Eliminating intermediate measurements in space-bounded Quantum computation · STOC 2021
Automata and formal languages › finite automata
quantum finite automata
0.412020
The Power of a Single Qubit: Two-Way Quantum Finite Automata and the Word Problem · ICALP 2020
Computational complexity › decision problems
word problem
0.412020
The Power of a Single Qubit: Two-Way Quantum Finite Automata and the Word Problem · ICALP 2020
Computational complexity › decision problems › word problem
word problem for groups
0.412020
The Power of a Single Qubit: Two-Way Quantum Finite Automata and the Word Problem · ICALP 2020
Computational complexity
circuit complexity
0.212016
The Hilbert Function, Algebraic Extractors, and Recursive Fourier Sampling · FOCS 2016
Computational complexity › pseudorandomness
extractors
0.212016
The Hilbert Function, Algebraic Extractors, and Recursive Fourier Sampling · FOCS 2016
Computational complexity
pseudorandomness
0.212016
The Hilbert Function, Algebraic Extractors, and Recursive Fourier Sampling · FOCS 2016
Computational geometry
algebraic geometry
0.112016
The Hilbert Function, Algebraic Extractors, and Recursive Fourier Sampling · FOCS 2016
Combinatorics and discrete mathematics
hilbert function
0.112016
The Hilbert Function, Algebraic Extractors, and Recursive Fourier Sampling · FOCS 2016

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

expected polynomial time · 0.4algebraic number transition amplitudes · 0.4algebraic geometry · 0.2VC dimension · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2021 Lower Bounds on the Running Time of Two-Way Quantum Finite Automata and Sublogarithmic-Space Quantum Turing Machines
abstract
The two-way finite automaton with quantum and classical states (2QCFA), defined by Ambainis and Watrous, is a model of quantum computation whose quantum part is extremely limited; however, as they showed, 2QCFA are surprisingly powerful: a 2QCFA with only a single-qubit can recognize the language $L_{pal}=\{w \in \{a,b\}^*:w \text{ is a palindrome}\}$ with bounded error in expected time $2^{O(n)}$, on inputs of length $n$. We prove that their result essentially cannot be improved upon: a 2QCFA (of any size) cannot recognize $L_{pal}$ with bounded error in expected time $2^{o(n)}$. To our knowledge, this is the first example of a language that can be recognized with bounded error by a 2QCFA in exponential time but not in subexponential time. Moreover, we prove that a quantum Turing machine (QTM) running in space $o(\log n)$ and expected time $2^{n^{1-Ω(1)}}$ cannot recognize $L_{pal}$ with bounded error; again, this is the first lower bound of its kind. Far more generally, we establish a lower bound on the running time of any 2QCFA or $o(\log n)$-space QTM that recognizes any language $L$ in terms of a natural "hardness measure" of $L$. This allows us to exhibit a large family of languages for which we have asymptotically matching lower and upper bounds on the running time of any such 2QCFA or QTM recognizer.
Zachary Remscrim
ITCS1
2021 Eliminating intermediate measurements in space-bounded Quantum computation
abstract
A foundational result in the theory of quantum computation, known as the "principle of safe storage," shows that it is always possible to take a quantum circuit and produce an equivalent circuit that makes all measurements at the end of the computation. While this procedure is time efficient, meaning that it does not introduce a large overhead in the number of gates, it uses extra ancillary qubits, and so is not generally space efficient. It is quite natural to ask whether it is possible to eliminate intermediate measurements without increasing the number of ancillary qubits. We give an affirmative answer to this question by exhibiting a procedure to eliminate all intermediate measurements that is simultaneously space efficient and time efficient. In particular, this shows that the definition of a space-bounded quantum complexity class is robust to allowing or forbidding intermediate measurements. A key component of our approach, which may be of independent interest, involves showing that the well-conditioned versions of many standard linear-algebraic problems may be solved by a quantum computer in less space than seems possible by a classical computer.
Bill Fefferman, Zachary Remscrim
STOC2
2020 The Power of a Single Qubit: Two-Way Quantum Finite Automata and the Word Problem
abstract
The two-way finite automaton with quantum and classical states (2QCFA), defined by Ambainis and Watrous, is a model of quantum computation whose quantum part is extremely limited; however, as they showed, 2QCFA are surprisingly powerful: a 2QCFA, with a single qubit, can recognize, with bounded error, the language L_{eq} = {a^m b^m :m ∈ ℕ} in expected polynomial time and the language L_{pal} = {w ∈ {a,b}^*:w is a palindrome} in expected exponential time. We further demonstrate the power of 2QCFA by showing that they can recognize the word problems of many groups. In particular 2QCFA, with a single qubit and algebraic number transition amplitudes, can recognize, with bounded error, the word problem of any finitely generated virtually abelian group in expected polynomial time, as well as the word problems of a large class of linear groups in expected exponential time. This latter class (properly) includes all groups with context-free word problem. We also exhibit results for 2QCFA with any constant number of qubits. As a corollary, we obtain a direct improvement on the original Ambainis and Watrous result by showing that L_{eq} can be recognized by a 2QCFA with better parameters. As a further corollary, we show that 2QCFA can recognize certain non-context-free languages in expected polynomial time. In a companion paper, we prove matching lower bounds, thereby showing that the class of languages recognizable with bounded error by a 2QCFA in expected subexponential time is properly contained in the class of languages recognizable with bounded error by a 2QCFA in expected exponential time.
Zachary Remscrim
ICALP1
2016 The Hilbert Function, Algebraic Extractors, and Recursive Fourier Sampling
abstract
In this paper, we apply tools from algebraic geometry to prove new results concerning extractors for algebraic sets, the recursive Fourier sampling problem, and VC dimension. We present a new construction of an extractor which works for algebraic sets defined by polynomials over GF(2) of substantially higher degree than the current state-of-the-art construction. We also exactly determine the GF(2)-polynomial degree of the recursive Fourier sampling problem and use this to provide new partial results towards a circuit lower bound for this problem. Finally, we answer a question concerning VC dimension, interpolation degree and the Hilbert function.
Zachary Remscrim
FOCS1