Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Trenton Tabor
dblp:132/4028
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Empirical software engineering · 87% Program analysis · 13% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Empirical software engineering › software fault analysis
bug study |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Is it a Bug? Understanding Physical Unit Mismatches in Robot Software · ICRA 2024 |
Empirical software engineering
developer studies |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Is it a Bug? Understanding Physical Unit Mismatches in Robot Software · ICRA 2024 |
Program analysis
static analysis |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Is it a Bug? Understanding Physical Unit Mismatches in Robot Software · ICRA 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
static analysis · 0.8dimensional analysis · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Is it a Bug? Understanding Physical Unit Mismatches in Robot SoftwareabstractRobot software is abundant with variables that represent real-world physical units (e.g., meters, seconds). Operations over different units (e.g., adding meters and seconds) may be incorrect and can lead to dangerous system misbehaviors; manually detecting such mistakes is challenging. Current software analysis techniques identify such mismatches using dimensional analysis rules and ROS-specific assumptions to analyze the source code. However, these are ignorant of the fact that physical unit mismatches in robotics code are often intentional (e.g., when operating a differential drive robot), resulting in false positive bug reports that can impede robotics developer trust and productivity. In this work, we study how developers introduce physical unit mismatches by manually inspecting 180 errors detected by the software analysis technique, Phys. We identify three types of physical unit mismatches and present a taxonomy of eight high-level categories of how these errors manifest. We find that developers often make unforced and paradigmatic physical unit mismatches through differential drives, small angle approximations, and controls. We draw insights on current development to inform future research to better detect, categorize, and address meaningful physical unit mismatches. Paulo Canelas, Trenton Tabor, John-Paul Ore, Alcides Fonseca, Claire Le Goues, Christopher Steven Timperley |
ICRA | 2 |
| 2022 | SBEVNet: End-to-End Deep Stereo Layout EstimationabstractAccurate layout estimation is crucial for planning and navigation in robotics applications, such as self-driving. In this paper, we introduce the Stereo Bird’s Eye View Network (SBEVNet)1, a novel supervised end-to-end framework for estimation of bird’s eye view layout from a pair of stereo images. Although our network reuses some of the building blocks from the state-of-the-art deep learning networks for disparity estimation, we show that explicit depth estimation is neither sufficient nor necessary. Instead, the learning of a good internal bird’s eye view feature representation is effective for layout estimation. Specifically, we first generate a disparity feature volume using the features of the stereo images and then project it to the bird’s eye view coordinates. This gives us coarse-grained information about the scene structure. We also apply inverse perspective mapping (IPM) to map the input images and their features to the bird’s eye view. This gives us fine-grained texture information. Concatenating IPM features with the projected feature volume creates a rich bird’s eye view representation which is useful for spatial reasoning. We use this representation to estimate the BEV semantic map. Additionally, we show that using the IPM features as a supervisory signal for stereo features can give an improvement in performance. We demonstrate our approach on two datasets: the KITTI [5] dataset and a synthetically generated dataset from the CARLA [4] simulator. For both of these datasets, we establish state-of-the-art performance compared to baseline techniques. Divam Gupta, Trenton Tabor, Jeff G. Schneider |
WACV | 3 |