Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Wojciech Rejchel

dblp:132/6194 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
7ranked-venue papers
5as first author
2since 2021 · last 2024
0000-0003-1148-1439ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 7 · 5 first-author · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 58% Learning theory · 42%

Topics — the 8 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models
graphical models
0.312018
Sparse Estimation in Ising Model via Penalized Monte Carlo Methods · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2018
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models › graphical models › markov random field
ising model
0.312018
Sparse Estimation in Ising Model via Penalized Monte Carlo Methods · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2018
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models › graphical models
markov random field
0.312018
Sparse Estimation in Ising Model via Penalized Monte Carlo Methods · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2018
Machine learning › Learning theory
model selection
0.312018
Sparse Estimation in Ising Model via Penalized Monte Carlo Methods · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2018
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › parameter estimation › maximum likelihood estimation
penalized likelihood
0.312018
Sparse Estimation in Ising Model via Penalized Monte Carlo Methods · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2018
Machine learning › Learning theory › high-dimensional statistics
sparse estimation
0.312018
Sparse Estimation in Ising Model via Penalized Monte Carlo Methods · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2018
Machine learning › Learning theory
generalization bounds
0.112012
On Ranking and Generalization Bounds · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2012
Machine learning › Learning theory
ranking
0.112012
On Ranking and Generalization Bounds · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2012

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

monte carlo maximum likelihood · 0.3lasso · 0.3
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Joint empirical risk minimization for instance-dependent positive-unlabeled data
Wojciech Rejchel, Pawel Teisseyre, Jan Mielniczuk
Knowl. Based Syst.1
2023 Double Logistic Regression Approach to Biased Positive-Unlabeled Data
abstract
Positive and unlabelled learning is an important non-standard inference problem which arises naturally in many applications. The significant limitation of almost all existing methods addressing it lies in assuming that the propensity score function is constant and does not depend on features (Selected Completely at Random assumption), which is unrealistic in many practical situations. Avoiding this assumption, we consider parametric approach to the problem of joint estimation of posterior probability and propensity score functions. We show that if both these functions are logistic with different parameters (double logistic model) then the corresponding parameters are identifiable. Motivated by this, we propose two approaches to their estimation: a joint maximum likelihood method and the second approach based on an alternating maximization of two Fisher consistent approximations. Our experimental results show that the proposed methods perform on par or better than the existing methods based on Expectation-Maximisation scheme.
Konrad Furmanczyk, Jan Mielniczuk, Wojciech Rejchel, Pawel Teisseyre
ECAI3
2018 Sparse Estimation in Ising Model via Penalized Monte Carlo Methods
abstract
We consider a model selection problem in high-dimensional binary Markov random fields. The usefulness of the Ising model in studying systems of complex interactions has been confirmed in many papers. The main drawback of this model is the intractable norming constant that makes estimation of parameters very challenging. In the paper we propose a Lasso penalized version of the Monte Carlo maximum likelihood method. We prove that our algorithm, under mild regularity conditions, recognizes the true dependence structure of the graph with high probability. The efficiency of the proposed method is also investigated via numerical studies.
Blazej Miasojedow, Wojciech Rejchel
J. Mach. Learn. Res.2
2017 Oracle inequalities for ranking and U-processes with Lasso penalty
Wojciech Rejchel
Neurocomputing1
2015 Fast rates for ranking with large families
Wojciech Rejchel
Neurocomputing1
2015 Comments and Correction on "U-Processes and Preference Learning" (Neural Computation Vol. 26, pp. 2896-2924, 2014)
abstract
This note corrects an error in the proof of corollary 1 of Li et al. ( 2014 ). The original claim of the contraction principle in appendix D of Li et al. no longer holds.
Wojciech Rejchel, Hong Li 0009, Chuanbao Ren, Luoqing Li
Neural Comput.1
2012 On Ranking and Generalization Bounds
Wojciech Rejchel
J. Mach. Learn. Res.1