Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Kazuya Nakagawa

dblp:132/6382 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2017
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-authorDatabases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
2 papers
Data mining · 78% Recommender systems · 22%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 50% Learning theory · 50%

Topics — the 7 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Learning theory › hypothesis testing
selective inference
0.312017
Selective Inference for Sparse High-Order Interaction Models · ICML 2017
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning
statistical inference
0.312017
Selective Inference for Sparse High-Order Interaction Models · ICML 2017
Data mining › dimensionality reduction
feature selection
0.312017
Selective Inference for Sparse High-Order Interaction Models · ICML 2017
Recommender systems › click-through rate prediction › feature interaction learning
high-order feature interaction
0.312017
Selective Inference for Sparse High-Order Interaction Models · ICML 2017
Data mining › structured data mining
graph mining
0.212016
Safe Pattern Pruning: An Efficient Approach for Predictive Pattern Mining · KDD 2016
Data mining › pattern mining
itemset mining
0.212016
Safe Pattern Pruning: An Efficient Approach for Predictive Pattern Mining · KDD 2016
Data mining
pattern mining
0.212016
Safe Pattern Pruning: An Efficient Approach for Predictive Pattern Mining · KDD 2016

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

selective inference framework · 0.6safe feature screening · 0.2pruning · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2017 Selective Inference for Sparse High-Order Interaction Models
abstract
Finding statistically significant high-order interactions in predictive modeling is important but challenging task because the possible number of high-order interactions is extremely large (e.g., $> 10^{17}$). In this paper we study feature selection and statistical inference for sparse high-order interaction models. Our main contribution is to extend recently developed selective inference framework for linear models to high-order interaction models by developing a novel algorithm for efficiently characterizing the selection event for the selective inference of high-order interactions. We demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed algorithm by applying it to an HIV drug response prediction problem.
Shinya Suzumura, Kazuya Nakagawa, Yuta Umezu, Koji Tsuda, Ichiro Takeuchi
ICML2
2016 Safe Pattern Pruning: An Efficient Approach for Predictive Pattern Mining
abstract
In this paper we study predictive pattern mining problems where the goal is to construct a predictive model based on a subset of predictive patterns in the database. Our main contribution is to introduce a novel method called safe pattern pruning (SPP) for a class of predictive pattern mining problems. The SPP method allows us to efficiently find a superset of all the predictive patterns in the database that are needed for the optimal predictive model. The advantage of the SPP method over existing boosting-type method is that the former can find the superset by a single search over the database, while the latter requires multiple searches. The SPP method is inspired by recent development of safe feature screening. In order to extend the idea of safe feature screening into predictive pattern mining, we derive a novel pruning rule called safe pattern pruning (SPP) rule that can be used for searching over the tree defined among patterns in the database. The SPP rule has a property that, if a node corresponding to a pattern in the database is pruned out by the SPP rule, then it is guaranteed that all the patterns corresponding to its descendant nodes are never needed for the optimal predictive model. We apply the SPP method to graph mining and item-set mining problems, and demonstrate its computational advantage.
Kazuya Nakagawa, Shinya Suzumura, Masayuki Karasuyama, Koji Tsuda, Ichiro Takeuchi
KDD1