Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Swapnil Hingmire
dblp:132/7615
· DBLP profile ↗
8ranked-venue papers
4as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 6 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 5 · 3 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
2 papers |
Data mining · 100% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Data mining › text mining
text classification |
0.4 | 2 | 2014 | Topic labeled text classification: a weakly supervised approach · SIGIR 2014 Document classification by topic labeling · SIGIR 2013 |
Data mining › text mining › text classification
weakly supervised classification |
0.2 | 1 | 2014 | Topic labeled text classification: a weakly supervised approach · SIGIR 2014 |
Data mining › text mining
topic modeling |
0.1 | 2 | 2014 | Topic labeled text classification: a weakly supervised approach · SIGIR 2014 Document classification by topic labeling · SIGIR 2013 |
Data mining › text mining › topic modeling
topic labeling |
0.1 | 1 | 2014 | Topic labeled text classification: a weakly supervised approach · SIGIR 2014 |
Data mining › text mining › topic modeling
latent dirichlet allocation |
0.0 | 1 | 2013 | Document classification by topic labeling · SIGIR 2013 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
latent dirichlet allocation · 0.4dirichlet distribution · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Objectifying the Subjective: Cognitive Biases in Topic InterpretationsabstractAbstract Interpretation of topics is crucial for their downstream applications. State-of-the-art evaluation measures of topic quality such as coherence and word intrusion do not measure how much a topic facilitates the exploration of a corpus. To design evaluation measures grounded on a task, and a population of users, we do user studies to understand how users interpret topics. We propose constructs of topic quality and ask users to assess them in the context of a topic and provide rationale behind evaluations. We use reflexive thematic analysis to identify themes of topic interpretations from rationales. Users interpret topics based on availability and representativeness heuristics rather than probability. We propose a theory of topic interpretation based on the anchoring-and-adjustment heuristic: users anchor on salient words and make semantic adjustments to arrive at an interpretation. Topic interpretation can be viewed as making a judgment under uncertainty by an ecologically rational user, and hence cognitive biases aware user models and evaluation frameworks are needed. Swapnil Hingmire, Ze Shi Li, Shiyu Zeng, Ahmed Musa Awon, Luiz Pedro Franciscatto Guerra, Neil A. Ernst |
Trans. Assoc. Comput. Linguistics | 1 |
| 2023 | RINX: A system for information and knowledge extraction from resumes
Girish Keshav Palshikar, Sachin Pawar, Anindita Sinha Banerjee, Rajiv Srivastava, Nitin Ramrakhiyani, Sangameshwar Patil, Devavrat Thosar, Jyoti Bhat, Ankita Jain, Swapnil Hingmire, Saheb Chaurasia, Payodhi Mandloi, Durgesh Chalavadi |
Data Knowl. Eng. | 10 |
| 2020 | R-VGAE: Relational-variational Graph Autoencoder for Unsupervised Prerequisite Chain LearningabstractThe task of concept prerequisite chain learning is to automatically determine the existence of prerequisite relationships among concept pairs.In this paper, we frame learning prerequisite relationships among concepts as an unsupervised task with no access to labeled concept pairs during training.We propose a model called the Relational-variational Graph AutoEncoder (R-VGAE) to predict concept relations within a graph consisting of concept and resource nodes.Results show that our unsupervised approach outperforms graph-based semi-supervised methods and other baseline methods by up to 9.77% and 10.47% in terms of prerequisite relation prediction accuracy and F1 score.Our method is notably the first graph-based model that attempts to make use of deep learning representations for the task of unsupervised prerequisite learning.We also expand an existing corpus which totals 1, 717 English Natural Language Processing (NLP)-related lecture slide files and manual concept pair annotations over 322 topics. Irene Li, Alexander R. Fabbri, Swapnil Hingmire, Dragomir R. Radev |
COLING | 3 |
| 2017 | WikiLDA: Towards More Effective Knowledge Acquisition in Topic Models using WikipediaabstractTowards the goal of enhancing interpretability of Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA) topics, we propose WikiLDA, an enhancement to LDA using Wikipedia concepts. In WikiLDA, initially, for each document in a corpus we "sprinkle" (append) its most relevant Wikipedia concepts. We then use Generalized Pólya Urn (GPU) to incorporate word-word, word-concept, and concept-concept semantic relatedness into the generative process of LDA. As the most probable concepts from inferred topics can be referred on Wikipedia, the topics are likely to become more interpretable and hence more usable in acquiring domain knowledge from humans for various text mining tasks (e.g. eliciting topic labels for text classification). Empirical results show that a projection of documents by WikiLDA in a semantically enriched and coherent topic space leads to improved performance in text classification like tasks, especially in domains where the classes are hard to separate. Swapnil Hingmire, Sutanu Chakraborti, Girish Keshav Palshikar, Abhay K. Sodani |
K-CAP | 1 |
| 2016 | Topics and Label Propagation: Best of Both Worlds for Weakly Supervised Text Classification
Sachin Pawar, Nitin Ramrakhiyani, Swapnil Hingmire, Girish Keshav Palshikar |
CICLing (2) | 3 |
| 2015 | Deciphering Review Comments: Identifying Suggestions, Appreciations and Complaints
Sachin Pawar, Nitin Ramrakhiyani, Girish Keshav Palshikar, Swapnil Hingmire |
NLDB | 4 |
| 2014 | Topic labeled text classification: a weakly supervised approachabstractSupervised text classifiers require extensive human expertise and labeling efforts. In this paper, we propose a weakly supervised text classification algorithm based on the labeling of Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA) topics. Our algorithm is based on the generative property of LDA. In our algorithm, we ask an annotator to assign one or more class labels to each topic, based on its most probable words. We classify a document based on its posterior topic proportions and the class labels of the topics. We also enhance our approach by incorporating domain knowledge in the form of labeled words. We evaluate our approach on four real world text classification datasets. The results show that our approach is more accurate in comparison to semi-supervised techniques from previous work. A central contribution of this work is an approach that delivers effectiveness comparable to the state-of-the-art supervised techniques in hard-to-classify domains, with very low overheads in terms of manual knowledge engineering. Swapnil Hingmire, Sutanu Chakraborti |
SIGIR | 1 |
| 2013 | Document classification by topic labelingabstractIn this paper, we propose Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA) [1] based document classification algorithm which does not require any labeled dataset. In our algorithm, we construct a topic model using LDA, assign one topic to one of the class labels, aggregate all the same class label topics into a single topic using the aggregation property of the Dirichlet distribution and then automatically assign a class label to each unlabeled document depending on its "closeness" to one of the aggregated topics. Swapnil Hingmire, Sandeep Chougule, Girish Keshav Palshikar, Sutanu Chakraborti |
SIGIR | 1 |