Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Daniel Crankshaw
dblp:132/8701
· DBLP profile ↗
9ranked-venue papers
4as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Computer networks · 3 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 2 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 2 · 1 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2 · 2 first-authorArtificial intelligence and machine learning · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer networks
2 papers |
Network management and operations · 83% Network optimization and economics · 17% | |
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Trustworthy machine learning · 50% Efficient and distributed learning · 25% Learning theory · 25% | |
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
3 papers |
Cloud and datacenter computing · 65% Parallel and multicore computing · 18% Energy-efficient computing · 17% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design · 100% | |
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Operating systems · 100% |
Topics — the 12 heaviest of 13, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design › fair division › max-min fairness
max-min fair allocation |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Solving Max-Min Fair Resource Allocations Quickly on Large Graphs · NSDI 2024 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
robustness |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | SOL: safe on-node learning in cloud platforms · ASPLOS 2022 |
Cloud and datacenter computing › cluster resource management and scheduling
cluster resource management |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | SOL: safe on-node learning in cloud platforms · ASPLOS 2022 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
inference serving |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Clipper: A Low-Latency Online Prediction Serving System · NSDI 2017 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › online learning
online prediction |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Clipper: A Low-Latency Online Prediction Serving System · NSDI 2017 |
Network management and operations
failure recovery |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Enhancing Network Failure Mitigation with Performance-Aware Ranking · NSDI 2025 |
Network optimization and economics
resource allocation |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Solving Max-Min Fair Resource Allocations Quickly on Large Graphs · NSDI 2024 |
Parallel and multicore computing
graph processing |
0.2 | 1 | 2014 | GraphX: Graph Processing in a Distributed Dataflow Framework · OSDI 2014 |
Operating systems
resource management |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | SOL: safe on-node learning in cloud platforms · ASPLOS 2022 |
Energy-efficient computing
power management |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | SOL: safe on-node learning in cloud platforms · ASPLOS 2022 |
Cloud and datacenter computing › inference serving
low-latency serving |
0.1 | 1 | 2017 | Clipper: A Low-Latency Online Prediction Serving System · NSDI 2017 |
Graph data management
distributed graph processing |
0.1 | 1 | 2014 | GraphX: Graph Processing in a Distributed Dataflow Framework · OSDI 2014 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
machine learning · 1.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Enhancing Network Failure Mitigation with Performance-Aware Ranking
Pooria Namyar, Arvin Ghavidel, Daniel Crankshaw, Daniel S. Berger, Kevin Hsieh, Srikanth Kandula, Ramesh Govindan, Behnaz Arzani |
NSDI | 3 |
| 2024 | Solving Max-Min Fair Resource Allocations Quickly on Large Graphs
Pooria Namyar, Behnaz Arzani, Srikanth Kandula, Santiago Segarra, Daniel Crankshaw, Umesh Krishnaswamy, Ramesh Govindan, Himanshu Raj |
NSDI | 5 |
| 2022 | SOL: safe on-node learning in cloud platformsabstractCloud platforms run many software agents on each server node. These agents manage all aspects of node operation, and in some cases frequently collect data and make decisions. Unfortunately, their behavior is typically based on pre-defined static heuristics or offline analysis; they do not leverage on-node machine learning (ML). In this paper, we first characterize the spectrum of node agents in Azure, and identify the classes of agents that are most likely to benefit from on-node ML. We then propose SOL, an extensible framework for designing ML-based agents that are safe and robust to the range of failure conditions that occur in production. SOL provides a simple API to agent developers and manages the scheduling and running of the agent-specific functions they write. We illustrate the use of SOL by implementing three ML-based agents that manage CPU cores, node power, and memory placement. Our experiments show that (1) ML substantially improves our agents, and (2) SOL ensures that agents operate safely under a variety of failure conditions. We conclude that ML-based agents show significant potential and that SOL can help build them. Daniel Crankshaw, Neeraja J. Yadwadkar, Daniel S. Berger, Christoforos E. Kozyrakis, Ricardo Bianchini |
ASPLOS | 2 |
| 2020 | InferLine: latency-aware provisioning and scaling for prediction serving pipelinesabstractServing ML prediction pipelines spanning multiple models and hardware accelerators is a key challenge in production machine learning. Optimally configuring these pipelines to meet tight end-to-end latency goals is complicated by the interaction between model batch size, the choice of hardware accelerator, and variation in the query arrival process. Daniel Crankshaw, Gur-Eyal Sela, Xiangxi Mo, Corey Zumar, Ion Stoica, Joseph Gonzalez 0001, Alexey Tumanov |
SoCC | 1 |
| 2018 | IDK Cascades: Fast Deep Learning by Learning not to Overthink
Xin Wang 0066, Yujia Luo, Daniel Crankshaw, Alexey Tumanov, Fisher Yu 0001, Joseph Gonzalez 0001 |
UAI | 3 |
| 2017 | Clipper: A Low-Latency Online Prediction Serving System
Daniel Crankshaw, Xin Wang 0066, Giulio Zhou, Michael J. Franklin, Joseph Gonzalez 0001, Ion Stoica |
NSDI | 1 |
| 2015 | The Missing Piece in Complex Analytics: Low Latency, Scalable Model Management and Serving with Velox
Daniel Crankshaw, Peter Bailis, Joseph Gonzalez 0001, Haoyuan Li 0001, Zhao Zhang 0007, Michael J. Franklin, Ali Ghodsi 0002, Michael I. Jordan |
CIDR | 1 |
| 2014 | GraphX: Graph Processing in a Distributed Dataflow Framework
Joseph Gonzalez 0001, Reynold Xin, Ankur Dave, Daniel Crankshaw, Michael J. Franklin, Ion Stoica |
OSDI | 4 |
| 2013 | Inverted indices for particle tracking in petascale cosmological simulationsabstractWe describe the challenges arising from tracking dark matter particles in state of the art cosmological simulations. We are in the process of running the Indra suite of simulations, with an aggregate count of more than 35 trillion particles and 1.1PB of total raw data volume. However, it is not enough just to store the particle positions and velocities in an efficient manner -- analyses also need to be able to track individual particles efficiently through the temporal history of the simulation. The required inverted indices can easily have raw sizes comparable to the original simulation. Daniel Crankshaw, Randal C. Burns, Bridget Falck, Tamás Budavári, Alex Szalay, Jie Wang 0075 |
SSDBM | 1 |