Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Ehsan Kazemi 0001
dblp:132/9101
· DBLP profile ↗
16ranked-venue papers
7as first author
2since 2021 · last 2022
0000-0001-8427-054XORCID · verified
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 11 · 4 first-author · 2 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2 · 2 first-authorSecurity and privacy · 1Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Theoretical computer science
10 papers |
Mathematical optimization · 72% Approximation and online algorithms · 12% Algorithms and data structures · 7% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
3 papers |
Data mining · 60% Recommender systems · 34% Data integration and cleaning · 6% | |
| Artificial intelligence
3 papers |
Trustworthy machine learning · 100% | |
| Network and information security
2 papers |
Privacy and data protection · 100% |
Topics — the 29 heaviest of 32, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Mathematical optimization › submodular optimization
submodular maximization |
2.9 | 7 | 2022 | Submodular Maximization in Clean Linear Time · NeurIPS 2022 Submodular Maximization Through Barrier Functions · NeurIPS 2020 Streaming Submodular Maximization under a k-Set System Constraint · ICML 2020 |
Mathematical optimization › submodular optimization › submodular maximization
streaming submodular maximization |
1.3 | 3 | 2021 | Regularized Submodular Maximization at Scale · ICML 2021 Streaming Submodular Maximization under a k-Set System Constraint · ICML 2020 Do Less, Get More: Streaming Submodular Maximization with Subsampling · NeurIPS 2018 |
Mathematical optimization
submodular optimization |
0.8 | 2 | 2021 | Regularized Submodular Maximization at Scale · ICML 2021 Data Summarization at Scale: A Two-Stage Submodular Approach · ICML 2018 |
Mathematical optimization › submodular optimization › submodular maximization
knapsack-constrained submodular maximization |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Submodular Maximization in Clean Linear Time · NeurIPS 2022 |
Mathematical optimization › submodular optimization › submodular maximization
distributed submodular maximization |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Regularized Submodular Maximization at Scale · ICML 2021 |
Mathematical optimization › submodular optimization › submodular maximization
constrained submodular maximization |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Submodular Maximization Through Barrier Functions · NeurIPS 2020 |
Approximation and online algorithms
approximation algorithms |
0.4 | 2 | 2018 | Do Less, Get More: Streaming Submodular Maximization with Subsampling · NeurIPS 2018 Data Summarization at Scale: A Two-Stage Submodular Approach · ICML 2018 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
fairness |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Eliminating Latent Discrimination: Train Then Mask · AAAI 2019 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › fairness
fairness criteria |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Eliminating Latent Discrimination: Train Then Mask · AAAI 2019 |
Recommender systems
sequential recommendation |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Adaptive Sequence Submodularity · NeurIPS 2019 |
Approximation and online algorithms › approximation algorithms
approximation guarantees |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Submodular Streaming in All Its Glory: Tight Approximation, Minimum Memory and Low Adaptive Complexity · ICML 2019 |
Mathematical optimization › combinatorial optimization › matroid constraint
cardinality constraint |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Submodular Streaming in All Its Glory: Tight Approximation, Minimum Memory and Low Adaptive Complexity · ICML 2019 |
Algorithms and data structures › data streams
streaming algorithms |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Submodular Streaming in All Its Glory: Tight Approximation, Minimum Memory and Low Adaptive Complexity · ICML 2019 |
Data mining › data reduction
data summarization |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Data Summarization at Scale: A Two-Stage Submodular Approach · ICML 2018 |
Data mining
submodular maximization |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Data Summarization at Scale: A Two-Stage Submodular Approach · ICML 2018 |
Mathematical optimization › submodular optimization › submodular maximization
deletion-robust submodular maximization |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Scalable Deletion-Robust Submodular Maximization: Data Summarization with Privacy and Fairness Constraints · ICML 2018 |
Algorithms and data structures › randomized algorithms › sampling
subsampling |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Do Less, Get More: Streaming Submodular Maximization with Subsampling · NeurIPS 2018 |
Graph algorithms and graph theory
graph matching |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | Growing a Graph Matching from a Handful of Seeds · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2015 |
Graph algorithms and graph theory › graph matching › graph alignment
seeded graph matching |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | Growing a Graph Matching from a Handful of Seeds · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2015 |
Privacy and data protection › location privacy
location-based services |
0.2 | 1 | 2014 | Hiding in the Mobile Crowd: LocationPrivacy through Collaboration · IEEE Trans. Dependable Secur. Comput. 2014 |
Privacy and data protection
location privacy |
0.2 | 1 | 2014 | Hiding in the Mobile Crowd: LocationPrivacy through Collaboration · IEEE Trans. Dependable Secur. Comput. 2014 |
Information theory › information-theoretic limits
information-theoretic lower bounds |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | Submodular Maximization in Clean Linear Time · NeurIPS 2022 |
Combinatorics and discrete mathematics › set functions
submodular functions |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | Submodular Maximization in Clean Linear Time · NeurIPS 2022 |
Mathematical optimization › numerical computation › numerical optimization › second-order methods › interior point methods
barrier methods |
0.1 | 1 | 2020 | Submodular Maximization Through Barrier Functions · NeurIPS 2020 |
Mathematical optimization
continuous optimization |
0.1 | 1 | 2020 | Submodular Maximization Through Barrier Functions · NeurIPS 2020 |
Graph algorithms and graph theory › independent set
maximum independent set |
0.1 | 1 | 2020 | Streaming Submodular Maximization under a k-Set System Constraint · ICML 2020 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › fairness › fair unsupervised learning
fair data summarization |
0.1 | 1 | 2018 | Scalable Deletion-Robust Submodular Maximization: Data Summarization with Privacy and Fairness Constraints · ICML 2018 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › protein analysis › protein-protein interaction › protein-protein interaction network analysis
protein interaction network alignment |
0.1 | 1 | 2015 | Growing a Graph Matching from a Handful of Seeds · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2015 |
Data integration and cleaning › entity resolution
social network reconciliation |
0.1 | 1 | 2015 | Growing a Graph Matching from a Handful of Seeds · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2015 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
streaming algorithms · 2.9approximation guarantees · 1.8distributed algorithm · 1.6submodularity · 0.8adaptive greedy policy · 0.8query complexity analysis · 0.6deterministic approximation algorithms · 0.6mapreduce · 0.5bootstrap percolation theory · 0.4reduction · 0.4potential function minimization · 0.4enumeration · 0.4barrier function · 0.4supervised learning · 0.4omitted variable bias · 0.4submodular optimization · 0.3approximation guarantee · 0.3epidemic model · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | Submodular Maximization in Clean Linear TimeabstractIn this paper, we provide the first deterministic algorithm that achieves $1/2$-approximation for monotone submodular maximization subject to a knapsack constraint, while making a number of queries that scales only linearly with the size of the ground set $n$. Moreover, our result automatically paves the way for developing a linear-time deterministic algorithm that achieves the tight $1-1/e$ approximation guarantee for monotone submodular maximization under a cardinality (size) constraint. To complement our positive results, we also show strong information-theoretic lower bounds. More specifically, we show that when the maximum cardinality allowed for a solution is constant, no deterministic or randomized algorithm making a sub-linear number of function evaluations can guarantee any constant approximation ratio. Furthermore, when the constraint allows the selection of a constant fraction of the ground set, we show that any algorithm making fewer than $\Omega(n/\log(n))$ function evaluations cannot perform better than an algorithm that simply outputs a uniformly random subset of the ground set of the right size. We extend our results to the general case of maximizing a monotone submodular function subject to the intersection of a $p$-set system and multiple knapsack constraints. Finally, we evaluate the performance of our algorithms on multiple real-life applications, including movie recommendation, location summarization, Twitter text summarization, and video summarization. Moran Feldman, Ehsan Kazemi 0001, Amin Karbasi |
NeurIPS | 3 |
| 2021 | Regularized Submodular Maximization at ScaleabstractIn this paper, we propose scalable methods for maximizing a regularized submodular function $f \triangleq g-\ell$ expressed as the difference between a monotone submodular function $g$ and a modular function $\ell$. Submodularity is inherently related to the notions of diversity, coverage, and representativeness. In particular, finding the mode (i.e., the most likely configuration) of many popular probabilistic models of diversity, such as determinantal point processes and strongly log-concave distributions, involves maximization of (regularized) submodular functions. Since a regularized function $f$ can potentially take on negative values, the classic theory of submodular maximization, which heavily relies on the non-negativity assumption of submodular functions, is not applicable. To circumvent this challenge, we develop the first one-pass streaming algorithm for maximizing a regularized submodular function subject to a $k$-cardinality constraint. Furthermore, we develop the first distributed algorithm that returns a solution $S$ in $O(1/ \epsilon)$ rounds of MapReduce computation. We highlight that our result, even for the unregularized case where the modular term $\ell$ is zero, improves the memory and communication complexity of the state-of-the-art by a factor of $O(1/ \epsilon)$ while arguably provides a simpler distributed algorithm and a unifying analysis. We empirically study the performance of our scalable methods on a set of real-life applications, including finding the mode of negatively correlated distributions, vertex cover of social networks, and several data summarization tasks. Ehsan Kazemi 0001, Shervin Minaee, Moran Feldman, Amin Karbasi |
ICML | 1 |
| 2020 | Streaming Submodular Maximization under a k-Set System ConstraintabstractIn this paper, we propose a novel framework that converts streaming algorithms for monotone submodular maximization into streaming algorithms for non-monotone submodular maximization. This reduction readily leads to the currently tightest deterministic approximation ratio for submodular maximization subject to a $k$-matchoid constraint. Moreover, we propose the first streaming algorithm for monotone submodular maximization subject to $k$-extendible and $k$-set system constraints. Together with our proposed reduction, we obtain $O(k\log k)$ and $O(k^2\log k)$ approximation ratio for submodular maximization subject to the above constraints, respectively. We extensively evaluate the empirical performance of our algorithm against the existing work in a series of experiments including finding the maximum independent set in randomly generated graphs, maximizing linear functions over social networks, movie recommendation, Yelp location summarization, and Twitter data summarization. Ran Haba, Ehsan Kazemi 0001, Moran Feldman, Amin Karbasi |
ICML | 2 |
| 2020 | Submodular Maximization Through Barrier FunctionsabstractIn this paper, we introduce a novel technique for constrained submodular maximization, inspired by barrier functions in continuous optimization. This connection not only improves the running time for constrained submodular maximization but also provides the state of the art guarantee. More precisely, for maximizing a monotone submodular function subject to the combination of a $k$-matchoid and $\ell$-knapsack constraints (for $\ell\leq k$), we propose a potential function that can be approximately minimized. Once we minimize the potential function up to an $\epsilon$ error, it is guaranteed that we have found a feasible set with a $2(k+1+\epsilon)$-approximation factor which can indeed be further improved to $(k+1+\epsilon)$ by an enumeration technique. We extensively evaluate the performance of our proposed algorithm over several real-world applications, including a movie recommendation system, summarization tasks for YouTube videos, Twitter feeds and Yelp business locations, and a set cover problem. Ashwinkumar Badanidiyuru, Amin Karbasi, Ehsan Kazemi 0001, Jan Vondrák |
NeurIPS | 3 |
| 2020 | MPGM: Scalable and Accurate Multiple Network AlignmentabstractProtein-protein interaction (PPI) network alignment is a canonical operation to transfer biological knowledge among species. The alignment of PPI-networks has many applications, such as the prediction of protein function, detection of conserved network motifs, and the reconstruction of species' phylogenetic relationships. A good multiple-network alignment (MNA), by considering the data related to several species, provides a deep understanding of biological networks and system-level cellular processes. With the massive amounts of available PPI data and the increasing number of known PPI networks, the problem of MNA is gaining more attention in the systems-biology studies. In this paper, we introduce a new scalable and accurate algorithm, called MPGM, for aligning multiple networks. The MPGM algorithm has two main steps: (i) SeedGeneration and (ii) MultiplePercolation. In the first step, to generate an initial set of seed tuples, the SeedGeneration algorithm uses only protein sequence similarities. In the second step, to align remaining unmatched nodes, the MultiplePercolation algorithm uses network structures and the seed tuples generated from the first step. We show that, with respect to different evaluation criteria, MPGM outperforms the other state-of-the-art algorithms. In addition, we guarantee the performance of MPGM under certain classes of network models. We introduce a sampling-based stochastic model for generating k correlated networks. We prove that for this model if a sufficient number of seed tuples are available, the MultiplePercolation algorithm correctly aligns almost all the nodes. Our theoretical results are supported by experimental evaluations over synthetic networks. Ehsan Kazemi 0001, Matthias Grossglauser |
IEEE ACM Trans. Comput. Biol. Bioinform. | 1 |
| 2019 | Eliminating Latent Discrimination: Train Then MaskabstractHow can we control for latent discrimination in predictive models? How can we provably remove it? Such questions are at the heart of algorithmic fairness and its impacts on society. In this paper, we define a new operational fairness criteria, inspired by the well-understood notion of omitted variable-bias in statistics and econometrics. Our notion of fairness effectively controls for sensitive features and provides diagnostics for deviations from fair decision making. We then establish analytical and algorithmic results about the existence of a fair classifier in the context of supervised learning. Our results readily imply a simple, but rather counter-intuitive, strategy for eliminating latent discrimination. In order to prevent other features proxying for sensitive features, we need to include sensitive features in the training phase, but exclude them in the test/evaluation phase while controlling for their effects. We evaluate the performance of our algorithm on several realworld datasets and show how fairness for these datasets can be improved with a very small loss in accuracy. Soheil Ghili, Ehsan Kazemi 0001, Amin Karbasi |
AAAI | 2 |
| 2019 | Submodular Streaming in All Its Glory: Tight Approximation, Minimum Memory and Low Adaptive ComplexityabstractStreaming algorithms are generally judged by the quality of their solution, memory footprint, and computational complexity. In this paper, we study the problem of maximizing a monotone submodular function in the streaming setting with a cardinality constraint $k$. We first propose SIEVE-STREAMING++, which requires just one pass over the data, keeps only $O(k)$ elements and achieves the tight $\frac{1}{2}$-approximation guarantee. The best previously known streaming algorithms either achieve a suboptimal $\frac{1}{4}$-approximation with $\Theta(k)$ memory or the optimal $\frac{1}{2}$-approximation with $O(k\log k)$ memory. Next, we show that by buffering a small fraction of the stream and applying a careful filtering procedure, one can heavily reduce the number of adaptive computational rounds, thus substantially lowering the computational complexity of SIEVE-STREAMING++. We then generalize our results to the more challenging multi-source streaming setting. We show how one can achieve the tight $\frac{1}{2}$-approximation guarantee with $O(k)$ shared memory, while minimizing not only the rounds of computations but also the total number of communicated bits. Finally, we demonstrate the efficiency of our algorithms on real-world data summarization tasks for multi-source streams of tweets and of YouTube videos. Ehsan Kazemi 0001, Marko Mitrovic, Morteza Zadimoghaddam, Silvio Lattanzi, Amin Karbasi |
ICML | 1 |
| 2019 | Adaptive Sequence SubmodularityabstractIn many machine learning applications, one needs to interactively select a sequence of items (e.g., recommending movies based on a user's feedback) or make sequential decisions in a certain order (e.g., guiding an agent through a series of states). Not only do sequences already pose a dauntingly large search space, but we must also take into account past observations, as well as the uncertainty of future outcomes. Without further structure, finding an optimal sequence is notoriously challenging, if not completely intractable. In this paper, we view the problem of adaptive and sequential decision making through the lens of submodularity and propose an adaptive greedy policy with strong theoretical guarantees. Additionally, to demonstrate the practical utility of our results, we run experiments on Amazon product recommendation and Wikipedia link prediction tasks. Marko Mitrovic, Ehsan Kazemi 0001, Moran Feldman, Andreas Krause 0001, Amin Karbasi |
NeurIPS | 2 |
| 2018 | Comparison Based Learning from Weak OraclesabstractThere is increasing interest in learning algorithms that involve interaction between hu- man and machine. Comparison-based queries are among the most natural ways to get feed- back from humans. A challenge in designing comparison-based interactive learning algorithms is coping with noisy answers. The most common fix is to submit a query several times, but this is not applicable in many situations due to its prohibitive cost and due to the unrealistic assumption of independent noise in different repetitions of the same query. In this paper, we introduce a new weak oracle model, where a non-malicious user responds to a pairwise comparison query only when she is quite sure about the answer. This model is able to mimic the behavior of a human in noise-prone regions. We also consider the ap- plication of this weak oracle model to the problem of content search (a variant of the nearest neighbor search problem) through comparisons. More specifically, we aim at devising efficient algorithms to locate a target object in a database equipped with a dissimilarity metric via invocation of the weak comparison oracle. We propose two algorithms termed Worcs-I and Worcs-II (Weak-Oracle Comparison- based Search), which provably locate the tar- get object in a number of comparisons close to the entropy of the target distribution. While Worcs-I provides better theoretical guarantees, Worcs-II is applicable to more technically challenging scenarios where the algorithm has limited access to the ranking dis- similarity between objects. A series of experiments validate the performance of our proposed algorithms. Ehsan Kazemi 0001, Lin Chen 0003, Sanjoy Dasgupta, Amin Karbasi |
AISTATS | 1 |
| 2018 | Scalable Deletion-Robust Submodular Maximization: Data Summarization with Privacy and Fairness ConstraintsabstractCan we efficiently extract useful information from a large user-generated dataset while protecting the privacy of the users and/or ensuring fairness in representation? We cast this problem as an instance of a deletion-robust submodular maximization where part of the data may be deleted or masked due to privacy concerns or fairness criteria. We propose the first memory-efficient centralized, streaming, and distributed methods with constant-factor approximation guarantees against any number of adversarial deletions. We extensively evaluate the performance of our algorithms on real-world applications, including (i) Uber-pick up locations with location privacy constraints; (ii) feature selection with fairness constraints for income prediction and crime rate prediction; and (iii) robust to deletion summarization of census data, consisting of 2,458,285 feature vectors. Our experiments show that our solution is robust against even $80%$ of data deletion. Ehsan Kazemi 0001, Morteza Zadimoghaddam, Amin Karbasi |
ICML | 1 |
| 2018 | Data Summarization at Scale: A Two-Stage Submodular ApproachabstractThe sheer scale of modern datasets has resulted in a dire need for summarization techniques that can identify representative elements in a dataset. Fortunately, the vast majority of data summarization tasks satisfy an intuitive diminishing returns condition known as submodularity, which allows us to find nearly-optimal solutions in linear time. We focus on a two-stage submodular framework where the goal is to use some given training functions to reduce the ground set so that optimizing new functions (drawn from the same distribution) over the reduced set provides almost as much value as optimizing them over the entire ground set. In this paper, we develop the first streaming and distributed solutions to this problem. In addition to providing strong theoretical guarantees, we demonstrate both the utility and efficiency of our algorithms on real-world tasks including image summarization and ride-share optimization. Marko Mitrovic, Ehsan Kazemi 0001, Morteza Zadimoghaddam, Amin Karbasi |
ICML | 2 |
| 2018 | Do Less, Get More: Streaming Submodular Maximization with SubsamplingabstractIn this paper, we develop the first one-pass streaming algorithm for submodular maximization that does not evaluate the entire stream even once. By carefully subsampling each element of the data stream, our algorithm enjoys the tightest approximation guarantees in various settings while having the smallest memory footprint and requiring the lowest number of function evaluations. More specifically, for a monotone submodular function and a $p$-matchoid constraint, our randomized algorithm achieves a $4p$ approximation ratio (in expectation) with $O(k)$ memory and $O(km/p)$ queries per element ($k$ is the size of the largest feasible solution and $m$ is the number of matroids used to define the constraint). For the non-monotone case, our approximation ratio increases only slightly to $4p+2-o(1)$. To the best or our knowledge, our algorithm is the first that combines the benefits of streaming and subsampling in a novel way in order to truly scale submodular maximization to massive machine learning problems. To showcase its practicality, we empirically evaluated the performance of our algorithm on a video summarization application and observed that it outperforms the state-of-the-art algorithm by up to fifty-fold while maintaining practically the same utility. We also evaluated the scalability of our algorithm on a large dataset of Uber pick up locations. Moran Feldman, Amin Karbasi, Ehsan Kazemi 0001 |
NeurIPS | 3 |
| 2016 | PROPER: global protein interaction network alignment through percolation matchingabstractBACKGROUND: The alignment of protein-protein interaction (PPI) networks enables us to uncover the relationships between different species, which leads to a deeper understanding of biological systems. Network alignment can be used to transfer biological knowledge between species. Although different PPI-network alignment algorithms were introduced during the last decade, developing an accurate and scalable algorithm that can find alignments with high biological and structural similarities among PPI networks is still challenging. RESULTS: In this paper, we introduce a new global network alignment algorithm for PPI networks called PROPER. Compared to other global network alignment methods, our algorithm shows higher accuracy and speed over real PPI datasets and synthetic networks. We show that the PROPER algorithm can detect large portions of conserved biological pathways between species. Also, using a simple parsimonious evolutionary model, we explain why PROPER performs well based on several different comparison criteria. CONCLUSIONS: We highlight that PROPER has high potential in further applications such as detecting biological pathways, finding protein complexes and PPI prediction. The PROPER algorithm is available at http://proper.epfl.ch . Ehsan Kazemi 0001, Seyed Hamed Hassani, Matthias Grossglauser, Hassan Pezeshgi Modarres |
BMC Bioinform. | 1 |
| 2015 | Growing a Graph Matching from a Handful of SeedsabstractIn many graph--mining problems, two networks from different domains have to be matched. In the absence of reliable node attributes, graph matching has to rely on only the link structures of the two networks, which amounts to a generalization of the classic graph isomorphism problem. Graph matching has applications in social--network reconciliation and de-anonymization, protein--network alignment in biology, and computer vision. The most scalable graph--matching approaches use ideas from percolation theory, where a matched node pair "infects" neighbouring pairs as additional potential matches. This class of matching algorithm requires an initial seed set of known matches to start the percolation. The size and correctness of the matching is very sensitive to the size of the seed set. In this paper, we give a new graph--matching algorithm that can operate with a much smaller seed set than previous approaches, with only a small increase in matching errors. We characterize a phase transition in matching performance as a function of the seed set size, using a random bigraph model and ideas from bootstrap percolation theory. We also show the excellent performance in matching several real large-scale social networks, using only a handful of seeds. Ehsan Kazemi 0001, Seyed Hamed Hassani, Matthias Grossglauser |
Proc. VLDB Endow. | 1 |
| 2014 | Hiding in the Mobile Crowd: LocationPrivacy through CollaborationabstractLocation-aware smartphones support various location-based services (LBSs): users query the LBS server and learn on the fly about their surroundings. However, such queries give away private information, enabling the LBS to track users. We address this problem by proposing a user-collaborative privacy-preserving approach for LBSs. Our solution does not require changing the LBS server architecture and does not assume third party servers; yet, it significantly improves users’ location privacy. The gain stems from the collaboration of mobile devices: they keep their context information in a buffer and pass it to others seeking such information. Thus, a user remains hidden from the server, unless all the collaborative peers in the vicinity lack the sought information. We evaluate our scheme against the Bayesian localization attacks that allow for strong adversaries who can incorporate prior knowledge in their attacks. We develop a novel epidemic model to capture the, possibly time-dependent, dynamics of information propagation among users. Used in the Bayesian inference framework, this model helps analyze the effects of various parameters, such as users’ querying rates and the lifetime of context information, on users’ location privacy. The results show that our scheme hides a high fraction of location-based queries, thus significantly enhancing users’ location privacy. Our simulations with real mobility traces corroborate our model-based findings. Finally, our implementation on mobile platforms indicates that it is lightweight and the cost of collaboration is negligible. Reza Shokri, George Theodorakopoulos 0001, Panagiotis Papadimitratos, Ehsan Kazemi 0001, Jean-Pierre Hubaux |
IEEE Trans. Dependable Secur. Comput. | 4 |
| 2013 | Where to go from here? Mobility prediction from instantaneous information
Vincent Etter, Mohamed Kafsi, Ehsan Kazemi 0001, Matthias Grossglauser, Patrick Thiran |
Pervasive Mob. Comput. | 3 |