Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Marc van Zee

dblp:133/1757 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
12ranked-venue papers
7as first author
1since 2021 · last 2023
0000-0003-2413-8074ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 9 · 5 first-author · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 5 · 3 first-authorSoftware engineering, systems software and programming languages · 2 · 1 first-authorDatabases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
4 papers
Efficient and distributed learning · 47% Knowledge representation and reasoning · 26% Language models and text generation · 23%
Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
2 papers
Software testing · 72% Programming languages and type systems · 28%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Recommender systems · 100%

Topics — the 8 heaviest of 11, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › distributed training
distributed training systems
0.712023
Scaling Up Models and Data with t5x and seqio · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2023
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › large-scale learning
large-scale model training
0.712023
Scaling Up Models and Data with t5x and seqio · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2023
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
compositional generalization
0.412020
Measuring Compositional Generalization: A Comprehensive Method on Realistic Data · ICLR 2020
Software testing › test infrastructure
benchmark construction
0.412020
Measuring Compositional Generalization: A Comprehensive Method on Realistic Data · ICLR 2020
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
belief revision
0.212015
AGM Revision of Beliefs about Action and Time · IJCAI 2015
Recommender systems
recommendation
0.212015
Rational Architecture = Architecture from a Recommender Perspective · IJCAI 2015
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
large language model
0.212023
Scaling Up Models and Data with t5x and seqio · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2023
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Multi-agent systems › normative multi-agent systems
commitments
0.112020
Intention as commitment toward time · Artif. Intell. 2020

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

compositional generalization evaluation · 0.9recommender system · 0.2AGM revision · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2023 Scaling Up Models and Data with t5x and seqio
abstract
Scaling up training datasets and model parameters have benefited neural network-based language models, but also present challenges like distributed compute, input data bottlenecks and reproducibility of results. We introduce two simple and scalable software libraries that simplify these issues: t5x enables training large language models at scale, while seqio enables reproducible input and evaluation pipelines. These open-source libraries have been used to train models with hundreds of billions of parameters on multi-terabyte datasets. Configurations and instructions for T5-like and GPT-like models are also provided. The libraries can be found at https://github.com/google-research/t5x and https://github.com/google/seqio.
Adam Roberts, Hyung Won Chung, Anselm Levskaya, Daniel Andor, Sharan Narang, Brian Lester, Colin Gaffney, Afroz Mohiuddin, Curtis Hawthorne, Aitor Lewkowycz, Alex Salcianu, Marc van Zee, Jacob Austin, Sebastian Goodman, Livio B. Soares, Haitang Hu, Sasha Tsvyashchenko, Aakanksha Chowdhery, Jasmijn Bastings, Jannis Bulian, Xavier Garcia, Jianmo Ni, Kathleen Kenealy, Kehang Han, Michelle Casbon, Jonathan H. Clark, Stephan Lee, Dan Garrette, James Lee-Thorp, Colin Raffel, Noam Shazeer, Marvin Ritter, Maarten Bosma, Alexandre Tachard Passos, Jeremy Maitin-Shepard, Noah Fiedel, Mark Omernick, Brennan Saeta, Ryan Sepassi, Alexander Spiridonov, Joshua Newlan, Andrea Gesmundo
J. Mach. Learn. Res.14
2020 Measuring Compositional Generalization: A Comprehensive Method on Realistic Data
Daniel Keysers, Nathanael Schärli, Nathan Scales, Hylke Buisman, Daniel Furrer, Sergii Kashubin, Nikola Momchev, Danila Sinopalnikov, Lukasz Stafiniak, Tibor Tihon, Dmitry Tsarkov, Xiao Wang 0038, Marc van Zee, Olivier Bousquet
ICLR13
2020 Intention as commitment toward time
Marc van Zee, Dragan Doder, Leon van der Torre, Mehdi Dastani, Thomas Icard, Eric Pacuit
Artif. Intell.1
2017 Rational Enterprise Architecture
Leon van der Torre, Marc van Zee
IEA/AIE (1)2
2016 Formalizing and Modeling Enterprise Architecture (EA) Principles with Goal-Oriented Requirements Language (GRL)
Diana Marosin, Marc van Zee, Sepideh Ghanavati
CAiSE2
2016 The RationalGRL Toolset for Goal Models and Argument Diagrams
abstract
Contains fulltext : 161870.pdf (Publisher’s version ) (Open Access)
Marc van Zee, Diana Marosin, Floris Bex, Sepideh Ghanavati
COMMA1
2016 AGM-Style Revision of Beliefs and Intentions
abstract
We introduce a logic for temporal beliefs and intentions based on Shoham's database perspective and we formalize his coherence conditions on beliefs and intentions. In order to do this we separate strong beliefs from weak beliefs. Strong beliefs are independent from intentions, while weak beliefs are obtained by adding intentions to strong beliefs and everything that follows from that. We provide AGM-style postulates for the revision of strong beliefs and intentions: strong belief revision may trigger intention revision, but intention revision may only trigger revision of weak beliefs. After revision, the strong beliefs are coherent with the intentions. We show in a representation theorem that a revision operator satisfying our postulates can be represented by a pre-order on interpretations of the beliefs, together with a selection function for the intentions.
Marc van Zee, Dragan Doder
ECAI1
2016 RationalGRL: A Framework for Rationalizing Goal Models Using Argument Diagrams
Marc van Zee, Diana Marosin, Floris Bex, Sepideh Ghanavati
ER1
2015 Rational Architecture = Architecture from a Recommender Perspective
Marc van Zee
IJCAI1
2015 AGM Revision of Beliefs about Action and Time
Marc van Zee, Dragan Doder, Mehdi Dastani, Leon van der Torre
IJCAI1
2015 Rationalization of goal models in GRL using formal argumentation
abstract
We apply an existing formal framework for practical reasoning with arguments and evidence to the Goal-oriented Requirements Language (GRL), which is part of the User Requirements Notation (URN). This formal framework serves as a rationalization for elements in a GRL model: using attack relations between arguments we can automatically compute the acceptability status of elements in a GRL model, based on the acceptability status of their underlying arguments and the evidence. We integrate the formal framework into the GRL metamodel and we set out a research to further develop this framework.
Marc van Zee, Floris Bex, Sepideh Ghanavati
RE1
2013 Multi-Cycle Query Caching in Agent Programming
abstract
In many logic-based BDI agent programming languages, plan selection involves inferencing over some underlying knowledge representation. While context-sensitive plan selection facilitates the development of flexible, declarative programs, the overhead of evaluating repeated queries to the agent's beliefs and goals can result in poor run time performance. In this paper we present an approach to multi-cycle query caching for logic-based BDI agent programming languages. We extend the abstract performance model presented in (Alechina et al. 2012) to quantify the costs and benefits of caching query results over multiple deliberation cycles. We also present results of experiments with prototype implementations of both single- and multi-cycle caching in three logic-based BDI agent platforms, which demonstrate that significant performance improvements are achievable in practice.
Natasha Alechina, Tristan M. Behrens, Mehdi Dastani, Koen V. Hindriks, Jomi Fred Hübner, Brian Logan 0001, Hai H. Nguyen, Marc van Zee
AAAI8