Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Marc van Zee
dblp:133/1757
· DBLP profile ↗
12ranked-venue papers
7as first author
1since 2021 · last 2023
0000-0003-2413-8074ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 9 · 5 first-author · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 5 · 3 first-authorSoftware engineering, systems software and programming languages · 2 · 1 first-authorDatabases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
4 papers |
Efficient and distributed learning · 47% Knowledge representation and reasoning · 26% Language models and text generation · 23% | |
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
2 papers |
Software testing · 72% Programming languages and type systems · 28% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Recommender systems · 100% |
Topics — the 8 heaviest of 11, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › distributed training
distributed training systems |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Scaling Up Models and Data with t5x and seqio · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2023 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › large-scale learning
large-scale model training |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Scaling Up Models and Data with t5x and seqio · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2023 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
compositional generalization |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Measuring Compositional Generalization: A Comprehensive Method on Realistic Data · ICLR 2020 |
Software testing › test infrastructure
benchmark construction |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Measuring Compositional Generalization: A Comprehensive Method on Realistic Data · ICLR 2020 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
belief revision |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | AGM Revision of Beliefs about Action and Time · IJCAI 2015 |
Recommender systems
recommendation |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | Rational Architecture = Architecture from a Recommender Perspective · IJCAI 2015 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
large language model |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | Scaling Up Models and Data with t5x and seqio · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2023 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Multi-agent systems › normative multi-agent systems
commitments |
0.1 | 1 | 2020 | Intention as commitment toward time · Artif. Intell. 2020 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
compositional generalization evaluation · 0.9recommender system · 0.2AGM revision · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Scaling Up Models and Data with t5x and seqioabstractScaling up training datasets and model parameters have benefited neural network-based language models, but also present challenges like distributed compute, input data bottlenecks and reproducibility of results. We introduce two simple and scalable software libraries that simplify these issues: t5x enables training large language models at scale, while seqio enables reproducible input and evaluation pipelines. These open-source libraries have been used to train models with hundreds of billions of parameters on multi-terabyte datasets. Configurations and instructions for T5-like and GPT-like models are also provided. The libraries can be found at https://github.com/google-research/t5x and https://github.com/google/seqio. Adam Roberts, Hyung Won Chung, Anselm Levskaya, Daniel Andor, Sharan Narang, Brian Lester, Colin Gaffney, Afroz Mohiuddin, Curtis Hawthorne, Aitor Lewkowycz, Alex Salcianu, Marc van Zee, Jacob Austin, Sebastian Goodman, Livio B. Soares, Haitang Hu, Sasha Tsvyashchenko, Aakanksha Chowdhery, Jasmijn Bastings, Jannis Bulian, Xavier Garcia, Jianmo Ni, Kathleen Kenealy, Kehang Han, Michelle Casbon, Jonathan H. Clark, Stephan Lee, Dan Garrette, James Lee-Thorp, Colin Raffel, Noam Shazeer, Marvin Ritter, Maarten Bosma, Alexandre Tachard Passos, Jeremy Maitin-Shepard, Noah Fiedel, Mark Omernick, Brennan Saeta, Ryan Sepassi, Alexander Spiridonov, Joshua Newlan, Andrea Gesmundo |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 14 |
| 2020 | Measuring Compositional Generalization: A Comprehensive Method on Realistic Data
Daniel Keysers, Nathanael Schärli, Nathan Scales, Hylke Buisman, Daniel Furrer, Sergii Kashubin, Nikola Momchev, Danila Sinopalnikov, Lukasz Stafiniak, Tibor Tihon, Dmitry Tsarkov, Xiao Wang 0038, Marc van Zee, Olivier Bousquet |
ICLR | 13 |
| 2020 | Intention as commitment toward time
Marc van Zee, Dragan Doder, Leon van der Torre, Mehdi Dastani, Thomas Icard, Eric Pacuit |
Artif. Intell. | 1 |
| 2017 | Rational Enterprise Architecture
Leon van der Torre, Marc van Zee |
IEA/AIE (1) | 2 |
| 2016 | Formalizing and Modeling Enterprise Architecture (EA) Principles with Goal-Oriented Requirements Language (GRL)
Diana Marosin, Marc van Zee, Sepideh Ghanavati |
CAiSE | 2 |
| 2016 | The RationalGRL Toolset for Goal Models and Argument DiagramsabstractContains fulltext : 161870.pdf (Publisher’s version ) (Open Access) Marc van Zee, Diana Marosin, Floris Bex, Sepideh Ghanavati |
COMMA | 1 |
| 2016 | AGM-Style Revision of Beliefs and IntentionsabstractWe introduce a logic for temporal beliefs and intentions based on Shoham's database perspective and we formalize his coherence conditions on beliefs and intentions. In order to do this we separate strong beliefs from weak beliefs. Strong beliefs are independent from intentions, while weak beliefs are obtained by adding intentions to strong beliefs and everything that follows from that. We provide AGM-style postulates for the revision of strong beliefs and intentions: strong belief revision may trigger intention revision, but intention revision may only trigger revision of weak beliefs. After revision, the strong beliefs are coherent with the intentions. We show in a representation theorem that a revision operator satisfying our postulates can be represented by a pre-order on interpretations of the beliefs, together with a selection function for the intentions. Marc van Zee, Dragan Doder |
ECAI | 1 |
| 2016 | RationalGRL: A Framework for Rationalizing Goal Models Using Argument Diagrams
Marc van Zee, Diana Marosin, Floris Bex, Sepideh Ghanavati |
ER | 1 |
| 2015 | Rational Architecture = Architecture from a Recommender Perspective
Marc van Zee |
IJCAI | 1 |
| 2015 | AGM Revision of Beliefs about Action and Time
Marc van Zee, Dragan Doder, Mehdi Dastani, Leon van der Torre |
IJCAI | 1 |
| 2015 | Rationalization of goal models in GRL using formal argumentationabstractWe apply an existing formal framework for practical reasoning with arguments and evidence to the Goal-oriented Requirements Language (GRL), which is part of the User Requirements Notation (URN). This formal framework serves as a rationalization for elements in a GRL model: using attack relations between arguments we can automatically compute the acceptability status of elements in a GRL model, based on the acceptability status of their underlying arguments and the evidence. We integrate the formal framework into the GRL metamodel and we set out a research to further develop this framework. Marc van Zee, Floris Bex, Sepideh Ghanavati |
RE | 1 |
| 2013 | Multi-Cycle Query Caching in Agent ProgrammingabstractIn many logic-based BDI agent programming languages, plan selection involves inferencing over some underlying knowledge representation. While context-sensitive plan selection facilitates the development of flexible, declarative programs, the overhead of evaluating repeated queries to the agent's beliefs and goals can result in poor run time performance. In this paper we present an approach to multi-cycle query caching for logic-based BDI agent programming languages. We extend the abstract performance model presented in (Alechina et al. 2012) to quantify the costs and benefits of caching query results over multiple deliberation cycles. We also present results of experiments with prototype implementations of both single- and multi-cycle caching in three logic-based BDI agent platforms, which demonstrate that significant performance improvements are achievable in practice. Natasha Alechina, Tristan M. Behrens, Mehdi Dastani, Koen V. Hindriks, Jomi Fred Hübner, Brian Logan 0001, Hai H. Nguyen, Marc van Zee |
AAAI | 8 |