Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Martin Kronegger

dblp:133/1922 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
12ranked-venue papers
5as first author
0since 2021 · last 2019
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 8 · 5 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 5 · 4 first-authorTheory of computation · 4Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 2

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
6 papers
Computational complexity · 100%
Artificial intelligence
6 papers
Planning, search and constraint satisfaction · 77% Knowledge representation and reasoning · 23%

Topics — the 7 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computational complexity
parameterized complexity
1.162019
Backdoors to planning · Artif. Intell. 2019
Fixed-Parameter Tractable Reductions to SAT for Planning · IJCAI 2015
A Parameterized Complexity Analysis of Generalized CP-Nets · AAAI 2014
Computational complexity › parameterized complexity
fixed-parameter tractability
0.732019
Backdoors to planning · Artif. Intell. 2019
Fixed-Parameter Tractable Reductions to SAT for Planning · IJCAI 2015
Backdoors to Planning · AAAI 2014
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction › classical planning
SAT-based planning
0.212015
Fixed-Parameter Tractable Reductions to SAT for Planning · IJCAI 2015
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction › planning › plan optimization
optimal planning
0.212013
Parameterized Complexity of Optimal Planning: A Detailed Map · IJCAI 2013
Computational complexity › parameterized complexity
kernelization
0.112015
Variable-Deletion Backdoors to Planning · AAAI 2015
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › nonmonotonic reasoning › preference handling › preference reasoning
CP-nets
0.112014
A Parameterized Complexity Analysis of Generalized CP-Nets · AAAI 2014
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › nonmonotonic reasoning › preference handling › preference reasoning
preference representation
0.112014
A Parameterized Complexity Analysis of Generalized CP-Nets · AAAI 2014

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

fixed-parameter tractable algorithm · 0.8fixed-parameter tractable reduction · 0.4extended causal graph · 0.4SAT reduction · 0.4parameterized complexity analysis · 0.4causal graph · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2019 Backdoors to planning
abstract
Backdoors measure the distance to tractable fragments and have become an important tool to find fixed-parameter tractable (fpt) algorithms. Despite their success, backdoors have not been used for planning, a central problem in AI that has a high computational complexity. In this work, we introduce two notions of backdoors building upon the causal graph. We analyze the complexity of finding a small backdoor (detection) and using the backdoor to solve the problem (evaluation) in the light of planning with (un)bounded plan length/domain of the variables. For each setting we present either an fpt-result or rule out the existence thereof by showing parameterized intractability. In three cases we achieve the most desirable outcome: detection and evaluation are fpt.
Martin Kronegger, Sebastian Ordyniak, Andreas Pfandler
Artif. Intell.1
2019 Parameterized Complexity of Asynchronous Border Minimization
Robert Ganian, Martin Kronegger, Andreas Pfandler, Alexandru Popa 0001
Algorithmica2
2015 Variable-Deletion Backdoors to Planning
abstract
Backdoors are a powerful tool to obtain efficient algorithms for hard problems. Recently, two new notions of backdoors to planning were introduced. However, for one of the new notions (i.e., variable-deletion) only hardness results are known so far. In this work we improve the situation by defining a new type of variable-deletion backdoors based on the extended causal graph of a planning instance. For this notion of backdoors several fixed-parameter tractable algorithms are identified. Furthermore, we explore the capabilities of polynomial time preprocessing, i.e., we check whether there exists a polynomial kernel. Our results also show the close connection between planning and verification problems such as Vector Addition System with States (VASS).
Martin Kronegger, Sebastian Ordyniak, Andreas Pfandler
AAAI1
2015 Fixed-Parameter Tractable Reductions to SAT for Planning
Ronald de Haan, Martin Kronegger, Andreas Pfandler
IJCAI2
2015 Parameterized Complexity of Asynchronous Border Minimization
Robert Ganian, Martin Kronegger, Andreas Pfandler, Alexandru Popa 0001
TAMC2
2015 Intra- and interdiagram consistency checking of behavioral multiview models
Petra Kaufmann, Martin Kronegger, Andreas Pfandler, Martina Seidl, Magdalena Widl
Comput. Lang. Syst. Struct.2
2014 A Parameterized Complexity Analysis of Generalized CP-Nets
abstract
Generalized CP-nets (GCP-nets) allow a succinct representation of preferences over multi-attribute domains. As a consequence of their succinct representation, many GCP-net related tasks are computationally hard. Even finding the more preferable of two outcomes is PSPACE-complete. In this work, we employ the framework of parameterized complexity to achieve two goals: First, we want to gain a deeper understanding of the complexity of GCP-nets. Second, we search for efficient fixed-parameter tractable algorithms.
Martin Kronegger, Martin Lackner, Andreas Pfandler, Reinhard Pichler
AAAI1
2014 Backdoors to Planning
abstract
Backdoors measure the distance to tractable fragments and have become an important tool to find fixed-parameter tractable (fpt) algorithms. Despite their success, backdoors have not been used for planning, a central problem in AI that has a high computational complexity. In this work, we introduce two notions of backdoors building upon the causal graph. We analyze the complexity of finding a small backdoor (detection) and using the backdoor to solve the problem (evaluation) in the light of planning with (un)bounded plan length/domain of the variables. For each setting we present either an fpt-result or rule out the existence thereof by showing parameterized intractability. In three cases we achieve the most desirable outcome: detection and evaluation are fpt.
Martin Kronegger, Sebastian Ordyniak, Andreas Pfandler
AAAI1
2014 A SAT-Based Debugging Tool for State Machines and Sequence Diagrams
Petra Kaufmann, Martin Kronegger, Andreas Pfandler, Martina Seidl, Magdalena Widl
SLE2
2013 Parameterized Complexity of Optimal Planning: A Detailed Map
Martin Kronegger, Andreas Pfandler, Reinhard Pichler
IJCAI1
2013 The Fourth Answer Set Programming Competition: Preliminary Report
Mario Alviano, Francesco Calimeri, Günther Charwat, Minh Dao-Tran, Carmine Dodaro, Giovambattista Ianni, Thomas Krennwallner, Martin Kronegger, Johannes Oetsch, Andreas Pfandler, Jörg Pührer, Christoph Redl, Francesco Ricca, Patrik Schneider, Martin Schwengerer, Lara Spendier, Johannes P. Wallner, Guohui Xiao 0001
LPNMR8
2013 VCWC: A Versioning Competition Workflow Compiler
Günther Charwat, Giovambattista Ianni, Thomas Krennwallner, Martin Kronegger, Andreas Pfandler, Christoph Redl, Martin Schwengerer, Lara Spendier, Johannes P. Wallner, Guohui Xiao 0001
LPNMR4