Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Jörg Schönfisch
dblp:133/9547 · also Joerg Schoenfisch
· DBLP profile ↗
6ranked-venue papers
3as first author
0since 2021 · last 2018
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 3 · 1 first-authorArtificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-authorSoftware engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
2 papers |
Knowledge graphs · 83% Data integration and cleaning · 17% | |
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Knowledge representation and reasoning · 100% |
Topics — the 7 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Knowledge graphs
temporal knowledge graph |
0.6 | 2 | 2017 | TeCoRe: Temporal Conflict Resolution in Knowledge Graphs · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2017 Marrying Uncertainty and Time in Knowledge Graphs · AAAI 2017 |
Knowledge graphs
uncertain knowledge graph |
0.6 | 2 | 2017 | TeCoRe: Temporal Conflict Resolution in Knowledge Graphs · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2017 Marrying Uncertainty and Time in Knowledge Graphs · AAAI 2017 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › probabilistic reasoning › probabilistic logic
markov logic networks |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Marrying Uncertainty and Time in Knowledge Graphs · AAAI 2017 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › probabilistic reasoning
probabilistic logic |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Marrying Uncertainty and Time in Knowledge Graphs · AAAI 2017 |
Data integration and cleaning › data fusion
conflict resolution |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | TeCoRe: Temporal Conflict Resolution in Knowledge Graphs · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2017 |
Knowledge graphs › knowledge graph reasoning
temporal inference |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | TeCoRe: Temporal Conflict Resolution in Knowledge Graphs · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2017 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
probabilistic reasoning |
0.1 | 1 | 2017 | TeCoRe: Temporal Conflict Resolution in Knowledge Graphs · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2017 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
temporal constraints · 0.6probabilistic soft logic · 0.6probabilistic reasoners · 0.6datalog constraints · 0.6
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 | Root cause analysis in IT infrastructures using ontologies and abduction in Markov Logic Networks
Jörg Schönfisch, Christian Meilicke, Janno von Stülpnagel, Jens Ortmann, Heiner Stuckenschmidt |
Inf. Syst. | 1 |
| 2017 | Marrying Uncertainty and Time in Knowledge GraphsabstractThe management of uncertainty is crucial when harvesting structured content from unstructured and noisy sources. Knowledge Graphs ( KGs ) are a prominent example. KGs maintain both numerical and non-numerical facts, with the support of an underlying schema. These facts are usually accompanied by a confidence score that witnesses how likely is for them to hold. Despite their popularity, most of existing KGs focus on static data thus impeding the availabilityof timewise knowledge. What is missing is a comprehensive solution for the management of uncertain and temporal data in KGs . The goal of this paper is to fill this gap. We rely on two main ingredients. The first is a numerical extension of Markov Logic Networks (MLNs) that provide the necessary underpinning to formalize the syntax and semantics of uncertain temporal KGs . The second is a set of Datalog constraints with inequalities that extend the underlying schema of the KGs and help to detect inconsistencies. From a theoretical point of view, we discuss the complexity of two important classes of queries for uncertain temporal KGs: maximuma-posteriori and conditional probability inference. Due to the hardness of these problems and the fact that MLN solvers do not scale well, we also explore the usage of Probabilistic Soft Logics (PSL) as a practical tool to support our reasoning tasks. We report on an experimental evaluation comparing the MLN and PSL approaches. Melisachew Wudage Chekol, Giuseppe Pirrò, Jörg Schönfisch, Heiner Stuckenschmidt |
AAAI | 3 |
| 2017 | Analyzing real-world SPARQL queries and ontology-based data access in the context of probabilistic data
Jörg Schönfisch, Heiner Stuckenschmidt |
Int. J. Approx. Reason. | 1 |
| 2017 | TeCoRe: Temporal Conflict Resolution in Knowledge GraphsabstractThe management of uncertainty is crucial when harvesting structured content from unstructured and noisy sources. Knowledge Graphs ( kg s), maintaining both numerical and non-numerical facts supported by an underlying schema, are a prominent example. Knowledge Graph management is challenging because: (i) most of existing kg s focus on static data, thus impeding the availability of timewise knowledge; (ii) facts in kg s are usually accompanied by a confidence score, which witnesses how likely it is for them to hold. We demonstrate T e C o R e , a system for temporal inference and conflict resolution in uncertain temporal knowledge graphs ( utkg s). At the heart of T e C o R e are two state-of-the-art probabilistic reasoners that are able to deal with temporal constraints efficiently. While one is scalable, the other can cope with more expressive constraints. The demonstration will focus on enabling users and applications to find inconsistencies in utkg s. T e C o R e provides an interface allowing to select utkg s and editing constraints; shows the maximal consistent subset of the utkg , and displays statistics (e.g., number of noisy facts removed) about the debugging process. Melisachew Wudage Chekol, Giuseppe Pirrò, Jörg Schönfisch, Heiner Stuckenschmidt |
Proc. VLDB Endow. | 3 |
| 2016 | Root Cause Analysis through Abduction in Markov Logic NetworksabstractIT infrastructure is a crucial part in most of today''s business operations. High availability and reliability, and short response times to outages are essential. Thus a high amount of tool support and automation in risk management is desirable to decrease outages. We propose a new approach for calculating the root cause for an observed failure in an IT infrastructure. Our approach is based on Abduction in Markov Logic Networks. Abduction aims to find an explanation for a given observation in the light of some background knowledge. In failure diagnosis, the explanation corresponds to the root cause, the observation to the failure of a component, and the background knowledge to the dependency graph extended by potential risks. We apply a method to extend a Markov Logic Network in order to conduct abductive reasoning, which is not naturally supported in this formalism. Our approach exhibits a high amount of reusability and enables users without specific knowledge of a concrete infrastructure to gain viable insights in the case of an incident. We implemented the method in a tool and illustrate its suitability for root cause analysis by applying it to a sample scenario. Jörg Schönfisch, Janno von Stülpnagel, Jens Ortmann, Christian Meilicke, Heiner Stuckenschmidt |
EDOC | 1 |
| 2014 | IT Risk Management with Markov Logic Networks
Janno von Stülpnagel, Jens Ortmann, Jörg Schönfisch |
CAiSE | 3 |