Mona Gridseth

dblp:134/0607 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
5ranked-venue papers
2as first author
1since 2021 · last 2021
0000-0002-7922-9806ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 2 first-author · 1 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 4 · 2 first-author · 1 since 2021Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
4 papers
3D vision · 41% Segmentation and scene understanding · 22% Autonomous driving · 22%
Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Human-robot interaction · 100%

Topics — the 8 heaviest of 10, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computer vision › 3D vision › point cloud segmentation
LiDAR segmentation
0.512021
Self-Supervised Learning of Lidar Segmentation for Autonomous Indoor Navigation · ICRA 2021
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding
semantic segmentation
0.512021
Self-Supervised Learning of Lidar Segmentation for Autonomous Indoor Navigation · ICRA 2021
Computer vision › 3D vision
visual localization
0.412020
DeepMEL: Compiling Visual Multi-Experience Localization into a Deep Neural Network · ICRA 2020
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping
visual odometry
0.112020
DeepMEL: Compiling Visual Multi-Experience Localization into a Deep Neural Network · ICRA 2020
Robotics › Autonomous driving
perception and planning
0.112019
Building a Winning Self-Driving Car in Six Months · ICRA 2019
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
robot control
0.112016
ViTa: Visual task specification interface for manipulation with uncalibrated visual servoing · ICRA 2016
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot control › sensor-based control › visual servoing
uncalibrated visual servoing
0.112016
ViTa: Visual task specification interface for manipulation with uncalibrated visual servoing · ICRA 2016
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot control › sensor-based control
visual servoing
0.112016
ViTa: Visual task specification interface for manipulation with uncalibrated visual servoing · ICRA 2016

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

self-supervised learning · 0.5ray tracing · 0.5image-based visual servoing · 0.5geometric overlay interface · 0.5SLAM · 0.5stereo visual teach and repeat · 0.4deep neural network · 0.4colour-constant imaging · 0.4CPU-based real-time algorithms · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2021 Self-Supervised Learning of Lidar Segmentation for Autonomous Indoor Navigation
abstract
We present a self-supervised learning approach for the semantic segmentation of lidar frames. Our method is used to train a deep point cloud segmentation architecture without any human annotation. The annotation process is automated with the combination of simultaneous localization and mapping (SLAM) and ray-tracing algorithms. By performing multiple navigation sessions in the same environment, we are able to identify permanent structures, such as walls, and disentangle short-term and long-term movable objects, such as people and tables, respectively. New sessions can then be performed using a network trained to predict these semantic labels. We demonstrate the ability of our approach to improve itself over time, from one session to the next. With semantically filtered point clouds, our robot can navigate through more complex scenarios, which, when added to the training pool, help to improve our network predictions. We provide insights into our network predictions and show that our approach can also improve the performances of common localization techniques.
Hugues Thomas, Ben Agro, Mona Gridseth, Jian Zhang 0050, Tim D. Barfoot
ICRA3
2020 DeepMEL: Compiling Visual Multi-Experience Localization into a Deep Neural Network
abstract
Vision-based path following allows robots to autonomously repeat manually taught paths. Stereo Visual Teach and Repeat (VT&R) [1] accomplishes accurate and robust long-range path following in unstructured outdoor environments across changing lighting, weather, and seasons by relying on colour-constant imaging [2] and multi-experience localization [3]. We leverage multi-experience VT&R together with two datasets of outdoor driving on two separate paths spanning different times of day, weather, and seasons to teach a deep neural network to predict relative pose for visual odometry (VO) and for localization with respect to a path. In this paper we run experiments exclusively on datasets to study how the network generalizes across environmental conditions. Based on the results we believe that our system achieves relative pose estimates sufficiently accurate for in-the-loop path following and that it is able to localize radically different conditions against each other directly (i.e. winter to spring and day to night), a capability that our hand-engineered system does not have.
Mona Gridseth, Tim D. Barfoot
ICRA1
2019 Building a Winning Self-Driving Car in Six Months
abstract
The SAE AutoDrive Challenge is a three-year competition to develop a Level 4 autonomous vehicle by 2020. The first set of challenges were held in April of 2018 in Yuma, Arizona. Our team (aUToronto/Zeus) placed first. In this paper, we describe Zeus' complete system architecture and specialized algorithms that enabled us to win. We show that it is possible to develop a vehicle with basic autonomy features in just six months relying on simple, robust algorithms. We do not make use of a prior map. Instead, we have developed a multi-sensor visual localization solution. All the algorithms in the paper run in real-time using CPUs only. We also highlight the closed-loop performance of the system in detail in several experiments.
Keenan Burnett, Andreas Schimpe, Sepehr Samavi, Mona Gridseth, Chengzhi Winston Liu, Qiyang Li, Zachary Kroeze, Angela P. Schoellig
ICRA4
2016 ViTa: Visual task specification interface for manipulation with uncalibrated visual servoing
abstract
We present a human robot interface (HRI) for semi-autonomous human-in-the-loop control, that aims to tackle some of the challenges for robotics in unstructured environments. Our HRI lets the user specify desired object alignments in an image editor as geometric overlays on images. The HRI is based on the technique of visual task specification [1], which provides a well studied theoretical framework. Tasks are completed using uncalibrated image-based visual servoing (UVS). Our interface is shown to be effective for a versatile set of tasks that span both coarse and fine manipulation. We complete tasks such as inserting a marker in its cap, inserting a small cube in a shape sorter, grasping a circular lid, following a line, grasping a screw, cutting along a line, picking and placing a box and grasping a cylinder using a Barrett WAM arm and hand.
Mona Gridseth, Oscar Ramirez, Camilo Perez Quintero, Martin Jägersand
ICRA1
2015 Visual pointing gestures for bi-directional human robot interaction in a pick-and-place task
abstract
This paper explores visual pointing gestures for two-way nonverbal communication for interacting with a robot arm. Such non-verbal instruction is common when humans communicate spatial directions and actions while collaboratively performing manipulation tasks. Using 3D RGBD we compare human-human and human-robot interaction for solving a pick-and-place task. In the human-human interaction we study both pointing and other types of gestures, performed by humans in a collaborative task. For the human-robot interaction we design a system that allows the user to interact with a 7DOF robot arm using gestures for selecting, picking and dropping objects at different locations. Bi-directional confirmation gestures allow the robot (or human) to verify that the right object is selected. We perform experiments where 8 human subjects collaborate with the robot to manipulate ordinary household objects on a tabletop. Without confirmation feedback selection accuracy was 70-90% for both humans and the robot. With feedback through confirmation gestures both humans and our vision-robotic system could perform the task accurately every time (100%). Finally to illustrate our gesture interface in a real application, we let a human instruct our robot to make a pizza by selecting different ingredients.
Camilo Perez Quintero, Romeo Tatsambon Fomena, Mona Gridseth, Martin Jägersand
RO-MAN3