Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Joseph E. Levy

dblp:134/0740 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 1968
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Theory of computation · 2 · 2 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
2 papers
Coding theory · 100%

Topics — the 8 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Coding theory
error-correcting codes
0.021968
A weight distribution bound for linear codes · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 1968
Self-synchronizing codes derived from binary cyclic codes · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 1966
Coding theory › error-correcting codes › block codes
linear code
0.011968
A weight distribution bound for linear codes · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 1968
Coding theory › error-correcting codes › coding bounds
minimum distance bounds
0.011968
A weight distribution bound for linear codes · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 1968
Coding theory › error-correcting codes
weight distribution
0.011968
A weight distribution bound for linear codes · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 1968
Coding theory › error-correcting codes
block codes
0.011966
Self-synchronizing codes derived from binary cyclic codes · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 1966
Coding theory › error-correcting codes › uniquely decodable codes
comma-free codes
0.011966
Self-synchronizing codes derived from binary cyclic codes · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 1966
Coding theory › error-correcting codes
cyclic codes
0.011966
Self-synchronizing codes derived from binary cyclic codes · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 1966
Coding theory › constrained coding
synchronization
0.011966
Self-synchronizing codes derived from binary cyclic codes · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 1966

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

combinatorial bounds · 0.0algebraic code construction · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1968 A weight distribution bound for linear codes
abstract
A linear code of block length n possessing minimum weight d has one code word of weight zero, and no other code words of weight less thand. The weight distribution of the code is given by the set of allW(j), d \leq j \leq n, describing the number of code words having a weight of exactlyj. Exact weight distributions are known for only a handful of linear codes. This paper presents an explicit upper bound uponW(j)as a function ofn, d, andj. The bound has general applicability to all linear codes.
Joseph E. Levy
IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory1
1966 Self-synchronizing codes derived from binary cyclic codes
abstract
The sensitivity of a binary block code to loss of synchronism (misplacement of the "commas" separating codewords) can be characterized by a pair of numbers[s, \delta]such that any synchronization slip of s bits or less produces an overlap sequence differing from a legitimate codeword in at least\deltaplaces. This definition is broader than that of comma freedom of index\delta, which is included as the special case of s equal to the integer part of half the code block length. For codes having the slip-detecting characteristic[s, \delta]there exists the possibility of implementation to restore synchronism during an interval relatively free from bit errors. It is shown that certain error-correcting binary cyclic block codes can be altered to obtain the characteristic[s, \delta]by the addition of a fixed binary vector to each codeword prior to transmission. These altered cyclic codes retain the full error-correcting power of the original cyclic codes. An error-detecting/correcting data format providing protection against the acceptance of misframed data is thus obtained without the insertion of special synchronizing sequences into the bit stream.
Joseph E. Levy
IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory1