Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Tianyu Liu 0004
dblp:134/1099-4
· DBLP profile ↗
10ranked-venue papers
5as first author
8since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0002-1147-8427ORCID · conflict
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 10 · 5 first-author · 8 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
7 papers |
Language models and text generation · 46% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 19% Information extraction and text analysis · 17% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Combinatorics and discrete mathematics · 100% |
Topics — the 18 heaviest of 20, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › tokenization › subword tokenization
byte-pair encoding |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Language Models over Canonical Byte-Pair Encodings · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning
probabilistic inference |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Syntactic and Semantic Control of Large Language Models via Sequential Monte Carlo · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › monte carlo methods
sequential monte carlo |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Syntactic and Semantic Control of Large Language Models via Sequential Monte Carlo · ICLR 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › language modeling
statistical language modeling |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Language Models over Canonical Byte-Pair Encodings · ICML 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
text generation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Syntactic and Semantic Control of Large Language Models via Sequential Monte Carlo · ICLR 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
tokenization |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Language Models over Canonical Byte-Pair Encodings · ICML 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
alignment |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | A Probability-Quality Trade-off in Aligned Language Models and its Relation to Sampling Adaptors · EMNLP 2024 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
decoding and sampling |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | A Probability-Quality Trade-off in Aligned Language Models and its Relation to Sampling Adaptors · EMNLP 2024 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
coreference resolution |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Linear-Time Modeling of Linguistic Structure: An Order-Theoretic Perspective · EMNLP 2023 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › syntactic parsing
dependency parsing |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Linear-Time Modeling of Linguistic Structure: An Order-Theoretic Perspective · EMNLP 2023 |
Natural language and speech › Machine translation › machine translation evaluation
discourse-aware evaluation |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Discourse-Centric Evaluation of Document-level Machine Translation with a New Densely Annotated Parallel Corpus of Novels · ACL (1) 2023 |
Natural language and speech › Machine translation
document-level machine translation |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Discourse-Centric Evaluation of Document-level Machine Translation with a New Densely Annotated Parallel Corpus of Novels · ACL (1) 2023 |
Natural language and speech › Machine translation
machine translation evaluation |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Discourse-Centric Evaluation of Document-level Machine Translation with a New Densely Annotated Parallel Corpus of Novels · ACL (1) 2023 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning
structured prediction |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Linear-Time Modeling of Linguistic Structure: An Order-Theoretic Perspective · EMNLP 2023 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
named entity recognition |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Towards Improving Neural Named Entity Recognition with Gazetteers · ACL (1) 2019 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
reinforcement learning from human feedback |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | A Probability-Quality Trade-off in Aligned Language Models and its Relation to Sampling Adaptors · EMNLP 2024 |
Combinatorics and discrete mathematics
partial orders |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | Linear-Time Modeling of Linguistic Structure: An Order-Theoretic Perspective · EMNLP 2023 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › text matching
neural text matching |
0.1 | 1 | 2018 | Learning to Explain Ambiguous Headlines of Online News · IJCAI 2018 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
parallel sorting · 1.3order-theoretic modeling · 1.3sequential monte carlo · 0.9probabilistic conditioning · 0.9model reparameterization · 0.9constrained inference · 0.9sampling adaptors · 0.8reinforcement learning from human feedback · 0.8neural sequence labeling · 0.4gazetteer · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Syntactic and Semantic Control of Large Language Models via Sequential Monte CarloabstractA wide range of LM applications require generating text that conforms to syntactic or semantic constraints. Imposing such constraints can be naturally framed as _probabilistic conditioning_, but exact generation from the resulting distribution—which can differ substantially from the LM’s base distribution—is generally intractable. In this work,
we develop an architecture for controlled LM generation based on sequential Monte Carlo (SMC). Our SMC framework allows us to flexibly incorporate domain- and problem-specific constraints at inference time, and efficiently reallocate computational resources in light of new information during the course of generation. By comparing to a number of alternatives and ablations on four challenging domains---Python code generation for data science, text-to-SQL, goal inference, and molecule synthesis—we demonstrate that, with little overhead, our approach allows small open-source language models to outperform models over 8$\times$ larger, as well as closed-source, fine-tuned ones.
In support of the probabilistic perspective, we show that these performance improvements are driven by better approximation to the posterior distribution.
[Our system](https://github.com/probcomp/genlm-control) builds on the framework of Lew et al. (2023) and integrates with its _language model probabilistic programming language_, giving users a simple, programmable way to apply SMC to a broad variety of controlled generation problems. João Loula, Benjamin LeBrun, Benjamin Lipkin, Clemente Pasti, Gabriel Grand, Tianyu Liu 0004, Yahya Emara, Marjorie Freedman, Jason Eisner, Ryan Cotterell, Vikash Mansinghka 0001, Alexander K. Lew, Tim Vieira, Timothy J. O'Donnell |
ICLR | 7 |
| 2025 | Language Models over Canonical Byte-Pair EncodingsabstractModern language models represent probability distributions over character strings as distributions over (shorter) token strings derived via a deterministic tokenizer, such as byte-pair encoding. While this approach is highly effective at scaling up language models to large corpora, its current incarnations have a concerning property: the model assigns nonzero probability mass to an exponential number of noncanonical token encodings of each character string—these are token strings that decode to valid character strings but are impossible under the deterministic tokenizer (i.e., they will never be seen in any training corpus, no matter how large). This misallocation is both erroneous, as noncanonical strings never appear in training data, and wasteful, diverting probability mass away from plausible outputs. These are avoidable mistakes! In this work, we propose methods to enforce canonicality in token-level language models, ensuring that only canonical token strings are assigned positive probability. We present two approaches: (1) canonicality by conditioning, leveraging test-time inference strategies without additional training, and (2) canonicality by construction, a model parameterization that guarantees canonical outputs but requires training. We demonstrate that fixing canonicality mistakes improves the likelihood of held-out data for several models and corpora. Tim Vieira, Tianyu Liu 0004, Clemente Pasti, Yahya Emara, Brian DuSell, Benjamin LeBrun, Mario Giulianelli, Juan Luis Gastaldi, Timothy J. O'Donnell, Ryan Cotterell |
ICML | 2 |
| 2025 | Pointwise Mutual Information as a Performance Gauge for Retrieval-Augmented GenerationabstractTianyu Liu, Jirui Qi, Paul He, Arianna Bisazza, Mrinmaya Sachan, Ryan Cotterell. Proceedings of the 2025 Conference of the Nations of the Americas Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2025. Tianyu Liu 0004, Jirui Qi, Paul He 0001, Arianna Bisazza, Mrinmaya Sachan, Ryan Cotterell |
NAACL (Long Papers) | 1 |
| 2024 | A Probability-Quality Trade-off in Aligned Language Models and its Relation to Sampling AdaptorsabstractThe relationship between the quality of a string, as judged by a human reader, and its probability, p(y) under a language model undergirds the development of better language models.For example, many popular algorithms for sampling from a language model have been conceived with the goal of manipulating p(y) to place higher probability on strings that humans deem of high quality (Fan et al., 2018;Holtzman et al., 2020).In this article, we examine the probability-quality relationship in language models explicitly aligned to human preferences, e.g., through reinforcement learning through human feedback.We show that, when sampling corpora from an aligned language model, there exists a trade-off between the strings' average reward and average log-likelihood under the prior language model, i.e., the same model before alignment with human preferences.We provide a formal treatment of this phenomenon and demonstrate how a choice of sampling adaptor allows for a selection of how much likelihood we exchange for the reward.https://github.com/tanyjnaaman/ probability-quality-paradox Naaman Tan, Josef Valvoda, Tianyu Liu 0004, Anej Svete, Yanxia Qin, Min-Yen Kan, Ryan Cotterell |
EMNLP | 3 |
| 2023 | Discourse-Centric Evaluation of Document-level Machine Translation with a New Densely Annotated Parallel Corpus of NovelsabstractYuchen Eleanor Jiang, Tianyu Liu, Shuming Ma, Dongdong Zhang, Mrinmaya Sachan, Ryan Cotterell. Proceedings of the 61st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2023. Yuchen Eleanor Jiang, Tianyu Liu 0004, Shuming Ma, Dongdong Zhang 0001, Mrinmaya Sachan, Ryan Cotterell |
ACL (1) | 2 |
| 2023 | Linear-Time Modeling of Linguistic Structure: An Order-Theoretic PerspectiveabstractTasks that model the relation between pairs of tokens in a string are a vital part of understanding natural language.Such tasks, in general, require exhaustive pair-wise comparisons of tokens, thus having a quadratic runtime complexity in the length of the string.We show that these exhaustive comparisons can be avoided, and, moreover, the complexity of such tasks can be reduced to linear by casting the relation between tokens as a partial order over the string.Our method predicts real numbers for each token in a string in parallel and sorts the tokens accordingly, resulting in total orders of the tokens in the string.Each total order implies a set of arcs oriented from smaller to greater tokens, sorted by their predicted numbers.The intersection of total orders results in a partial order over the set of tokens in the string, which is then decoded into a directed graph representing the desired linguistic structure.Our experiments on dependency parsing and coreference resolution show that our method achieves state-of-the-art or comparable performance.Moreover, the linear complexity and parallelism of our method double the speed of graph-based coref- erence resolution models, and bring a 10-times speed-up over graph-based dependency parsers. Tianyu Liu 0004, Afra Amini, Mrinmaya Sachan, Ryan Cotterell |
EMNLP | 1 |
| 2022 | BlonDe: An Automatic Evaluation Metric for Document-level Machine TranslationabstractYuchen Jiang, Tianyu Liu, Shuming Ma, Dongdong Zhang, Jian Yang, Haoyang Huang, Rico Sennrich, Ryan Cotterell, Mrinmaya Sachan, Ming Zhou. Proceedings of the 2022 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies. 2022. Tianyu Liu 0004, Shuming Ma, Dongdong Zhang 0001, Jian Yang 0030, Haoyang Huang, Rico Sennrich, Ryan Cotterell, Mrinmaya Sachan, Ming Zhou 0001 |
NAACL-HLT | 2 |
| 2022 | A Structured Span SelectorabstractTianyu Liu, Yuchen Jiang, Ryan Cotterell, Mrinmaya Sachan. Proceedings of the 2022 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies. 2022. Tianyu Liu 0004, Yuchen Eleanor Jiang, Ryan Cotterell, Mrinmaya Sachan |
NAACL-HLT | 1 |
| 2019 | Towards Improving Neural Named Entity Recognition with GazetteersabstractMost of the recently proposed neural models for named entity recognition have been purely data-driven, with a strong emphasis on getting rid of the efforts for collecting external resources or designing hand-crafted features.This could increase the chance of overfitting since the models cannot access any supervision signal beyond the small amount of annotated data, limiting their power to generalize beyond the annotated entities.In this work, we show that properly utilizing external gazetteers could benefit segmental neural NER models.We add a simple module on the recently proposed hybrid semi-Markov CRF architecture and observe some promising results. Tianyu Liu 0004, Jin-Ge Yao, Chin-Yew Lin |
ACL (1) | 1 |
| 2018 | Learning to Explain Ambiguous Headlines of Online NewsabstractWith the purpose of attracting clicks, online news publishers and editors use diverse strategies to make their headlines catchy, with a sacrifice of accuracy. Specifically, a considerable portion of news headlines is ambiguous. Such headlines are unclear relative to the content of the story, and largely degrade the reading experience of the audience. In this paper, we focus on dealing with the information gap caused by the ambiguous news headlines. We define a new task of explaining ambiguous headlines with short informative texts, and build a benchmark dataset for evaluation. We address the task by selecting a proper sentence from the news body to resolve the ambiguity in an ambiguous headline. Both feature engineering methods and neural network methods are explored. For feature engineering, we improve a standard SVM classifier with elaborately designed features. For neural networks, we propose an ambiguity-aware neural matching model based on a previous model. Utilizing automatic and manual evaluation metrics, we demonstrate the efficacy and the complementarity of the two methods, and the ambiguity-aware neural matching model achieves the state-of-the-art performance on this challenging task. Tianyu Liu 0004, Xiaojun Wan 0001 |
IJCAI | 1 |