Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Chloe Griffiths

dblp:134/3112 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2014
0009-0003-3997-3088ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 2

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Environmental and earth informatics · 100%
Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Ubiquitous computing and smart environments · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Environmental and earth informatics
citizen science
0.212014
Listening to the forest and its curators: lessons learnt from a bioacoustic smartphone application deployment · CHI 2014
Ubiquitous computing and smart environments › mobile sensing
smartphone sensing
0.112014
Listening to the forest and its curators: lessons learnt from a bioacoustic smartphone application deployment · CHI 2014

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

interviews · 0.4deployment study · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2014 Listening to the forest and its curators: lessons learnt from a bioacoustic smartphone application deployment
abstract
Our natural environment is complex and sensitive, and is home to a number of species on the verge of extinction. Surveying is one approach to their preservation, and can be supported by technology. This paper presents the deployment of a smartphone-based citizen science biodiversity application. Our findings from interviews with members of the biodiversity community revealed a tension between the technology and their established working practices. From our experience, we present a series of general guidelines for those designing citizen science apps.
Stuart Moran, Nadia Pantidi, Tom Rodden, Alan Chamberlain, Chloe Griffiths, Davide Zilli, Geoff V. Merrett, Alex Rogers
CHI5
2013 Moths at midnight: design implications for supporting ecology-focused citizen science
abstract
This paper presents some initial findings, which form a set of design implications from a study that relates to the increasingly popular activity of people setting up moth traps in private gardens. Moth trapping can either be done by an individual or a small group and involves setting a trap that will safely catch moths overnight. The trap is opened in the morning and the contents identified and recorded. This information is usually reported to the local records centre (LRC). This research is based on a rapid ethnographic study and interviews, which demonstrate a series of intervention points that would augment this branch of citizen science, (also known as crowd-sourced science) where mobile ubiquitous technology could both support the fore-mentioned activity and enhance the user's experience. These points relate to: the identification of species; habitat; flight season; verification; learning; reporting; and associated social information sharing.
Alan Chamberlain, Chloe Griffiths
MUM2