Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Sven Peter

dblp:134/3156 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
2as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 2 first-author · 1 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
3 papers
3D vision · 40% Face, body and person analysis · 30% Learning paradigms · 10%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%

Topics — the 7 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computer vision › Face, body and person analysis
human pose estimation
0.912025
Systematic Comparison of Projection Methods for Monocular 3D Human Pose Estimation on Fisheye Images · ICRA 2025
Computer vision › 3D vision › 3d human pose estimation
monocular 3d pose estimation
0.912025
Systematic Comparison of Projection Methods for Monocular 3D Human Pose Estimation on Fisheye Images · ICRA 2025
Machine learning › Learning paradigms
cost-sensitive learning
0.312017
Cost efficient gradient boosting · NIPS 2017
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods
gradient boosting
0.312017
Cost efficient gradient boosting · NIPS 2017
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › unsupervised representation learning
sparse coding
0.312017
Sparse convolutional coding for neuronal assembly detection · NIPS 2017
Bioinformatics and computational biology › neuroscience › neuroinformatics
neural data analysis
0.312017
Sparse convolutional coding for neuronal assembly detection · NIPS 2017
Computer vision › 3D vision › camera calibration
camera model
0.312025
Systematic Comparison of Projection Methods for Monocular 3D Human Pose Estimation on Fisheye Images · ICRA 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

pinhole projection · 0.9equidistant projection · 0.9double sphere projection · 0.9cylindrical projection · 0.9sparse convolutional coding · 0.6convolutional sparse coding · 0.6regression tree · 0.3gradient boosting · 0.3
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Systematic Comparison of Projection Methods for Monocular 3D Human Pose Estimation on Fisheye Images
abstract
Fisheye cameras offer robots the ability to capture human movements across a wider field of view (FOV) than standard pinhole cameras, making them particularly useful for applications in human-robot interaction and automotive contexts. However, accurately detecting human poses in fisheye images is challenging due to the curved distortions inherent to fisheye optics. While various methods for undistorting fisheye images have been proposed, their effectiveness and limitations for poses that cover a wide FOV has not been systematically evaluated in the context of absolute human pose estimation from monocular fisheye images. To address this gap, we evaluate the impact of pinhole, equidistant and double sphere camera models, as well as cylindrical projection methods, on 3D human pose estimation accuracy. We find that in close-up scenarios, pinhole projection is inadequate, and the optimal projection method varies with the FOV covered by the human pose. The usage of advanced fisheye models like the double sphere model significantly enhances 3D human pose estimation accuracy. We propose a heuristic for selecting the appropriate projection model based on the detection bounding box to enhance prediction quality. Additionally, we introduce and evaluate on our novel FISHnCHIPS dataset, which features 3D human skeleton annotations in fisheye images, including images from unconventional angles, such as extreme close-ups, ground-mounted cameras, and wide-FOV poses, available at: https://www.vision.rwth-aachen.de/fishnchips.
Stephanie Käs, Sven Peter, Henrik Thillmann, Anton Burenko, David B. Adrian, Dennis Mack, Timm Linder, Bastian Leibe
ICRA2
2017 Cost efficient gradient boosting
abstract
Many applications require learning classifiers or regressors that are both accurate and cheap to evaluate. Prediction cost can be drastically reduced if the learned predictor is constructed such that on the majority of the inputs, it uses cheap features and fast evaluations. The main challenge is to do so with little loss in accuracy. In this work we propose a budget-aware strategy based on deep boosted regression trees. In contrast to previous approaches to learning with cost penalties, our method can grow very deep trees that on average are nonetheless cheap to compute. We evaluate our method on a number of datasets and find that it outperforms the current state of the art by a large margin. Our algorithm is easy to implement and its learning time is comparable to that of the original gradient boosting. Source code is made available at http://github.com/svenpeter42/LightGBM-CEGB.
Sven Peter, Ferran Diego, Fred A. Hamprecht, Boaz Nadler
NIPS1
2017 Sparse convolutional coding for neuronal assembly detection
abstract
Cell assemblies, originally proposed by Donald Hebb (1949), are subsets of neurons firing in a temporally coordinated way that gives rise to repeated motifs supposed to underly neural representations and information processing. Although Hebb's original proposal dates back many decades, the detection of assemblies and their role in coding is still an open and current research topic, partly because simultaneous recordings from large populations of neurons became feasible only relatively recently. Most current and easy-to-apply computational techniques focus on the identification of strictly synchronously spiking neurons. In this paper we propose a new algorithm, based on sparse convolutional coding, for detecting recurrent motifs of arbitrary structure up to a given length. Testing of our algorithm on synthetically generated datasets shows that it outperforms established methods and accurately identifies the temporal structure of embedded assemblies, even when these contain overlapping neurons or when strong background noise is present. Moreover, exploratory analysis of experimental datasets from hippocampal slices and cortical neuron cultures have provided promising results.
Sven Peter, Elke Kirschbaum, Martin Both, Lee Campbell, Brandon Harvey, Conor Heins, Daniel Durstewitz, Ferran Diego, Fred A. Hamprecht
NIPS1