Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Amir Mousavi
dblp:134/3655
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
3since 2021 · last 2026
0000-0003-0067-4294ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 since 2021Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Image recognition and object detection · 67% Segmentation and scene understanding · 33% | |
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Services computing and microservices · 77% Requirements engineering and software design · 23% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding
part segmentation |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | PACO: Parts and Attributes of Common Objects · CVPR 2023 |
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection › object detection › open-vocabulary object detection
zero-shot object detection |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | PACO: Parts and Attributes of Common Objects · CVPR 2023 |
Requirements engineering and software design › software architecture › software architecture analysis
software architecture recovery |
0.3 | 1 | 2026 | Improving Microservices Identification for Migration to Cloud-Native Applications · IEEE Trans. Serv. Comput. 2026 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
graph modeling · 1.0clustering · 1.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Heterogeneity in entity matching: A survey and experimental analysisabstractEntity matching (EM) is a fundamental task in data integration and analytics, essential for identifying records that refer to the same real-world entity across diverse sources. In practice, datasets often differ widely in structure, format, schema, and semantics, creating substantial challenges for EM. We refer to this setting as Heterogeneous EM (HEM) . This survey offers a unified perspective on HEM by introducing a taxonomy, grounded in prior work, that distinguishes two primary categories– representation and semantic heterogeneity –and their subtypes. The taxonomy provides a systematic lens for understanding how variations in data form and meaning shape the complexity of matching tasks. We then connect this framework to the FAIR principles – Findability , Accessibility , Interoperability , and Reusability –demonstrating how they both reveal the challenges of HEM and suggest strategies for mitigating them. Building on this foundation, we critically review recent EM methods, examining their ability to address different heterogeneity types, and conduct targeted experiments on state-of-the-art models to evaluate their robustness and adaptability under semantic heterogeneity. Our analysis uncovers persistent limitations in current approaches and points to promising directions for future research, including multimodal matching, human-in-the-loop workflows, deeper integration with large language models and knowledge graphs, and fairness-aware evaluation in heterogeneous settings. Mohammad Hossein Moslemi, Amir Mousavi, Behshid Behkamal, Mostafa Milani |
Data Knowl. Eng. | 2 |
| 2026 | Improving Microservices Identification for Migration to Cloud-Native ApplicationsabstractRecently, the software development industry has witnessed a growing trend toward migrating from monolithic systems to microservices. However, identifying microservice candidates from an existing monolith is a primary challenge in this migration process, often proving to be a complex and labor-intensive task. Current methods for identifying microservice candidates have major drawbacks. They fail to adequately cover the various dependencies between different system entities and their relative importance. Additionally, these methods neglect to simultaneously consider important microservice architectural characteristics, such as functional independence, data independence, and granularity. Typically, these identification methods involve graph modeling of system classes, followed by a clustering process to optimize coupling and cohesion between classes. Identifying microservices from such a graph in a large monolith requires significant time and computational power. To address these limitations, this paper proposes a method that utilizes structural, conceptual, behavioral, and database dependencies to identify microservice candidates from monolithic systems. This method simultaneously addresses key characteristics of the microservices architecture and attempts to manage the time cost of identifying microservices. The proposed method has been evaluated using four widely-used open-source projects as case studies, analyzing five metrics in total. The results show that our method outperforms existing approaches across various evaluation metrics. Shaghayegh Izadpanah, Abbas Rasoolzadegan Barforoush, Saeid Abrishami, Amir Mousavi |
IEEE Trans. Serv. Comput. | 4 |
| 2023 | PACO: Parts and Attributes of Common ObjectsabstractObject models are gradually progressing from predicting just category labels to providing detailed descriptions of object instances. This motivates the need for large datasets which go beyond traditional object masks and provide richer annotations such as part masks and attributes. Hence, we introduce PACO: Parts and Attributes of Common Objects. It spans 75 object categories, 456 object-part categories and 55 attributes across image (LVIS) and video (Eg04D) datasets. We provide 641K part masks an-notated across 260K object boxes, with roughly half of them exhaustively annotated with attributes as well. We design evaluation metrics and provide benchmark results for three tasks on the dataset: part mask segmentation, object and part attribute prediction and zero-shot instance detection. Dataset, models, and code are open-sourced at https://github.com/jacebookresearch/paco. Vignesh Ramanathan, Anmol Kalia, Vladan Petrovic, Yi Wen 0006, Baixue Zheng, Baishan Guo, Rui Wang 0067, Aaron Marquez, Rama Kovvuri, Abhishek Kadian, Amir Mousavi, Yiwen Song, Abhimanyu Dubey, Dhruv Mahajan 0001 |
CVPR | 11 |