Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Milind Bhandarkar
dblp:134/4057
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2014
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2 · 1 first-authorArtificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-authorSystems, architecture and hardware · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Database system architecture and tuning · 44% Distributed and cloud data management · 44% Transaction processing and concurrency control · 13% | |
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
2 papers |
Storage systems · 54% Cloud and datacenter computing · 46% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Database system architecture and tuning
massively parallel processing |
0.2 | 1 | 2014 | HAWQ: a massively parallel processing SQL engine in hadoop · SIGMOD Conference 2014 |
Cloud and datacenter computing
datacenter storage |
0.0 | 1 | 2013 | Hadoop: a view from the trenches · KDD 2013 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
UDP-based software interconnect · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 | HAWQ: a massively parallel processing SQL engine in hadoopabstractHAWQ, developed at Pivotal, is a massively parallel processing SQL engine sitting on top of HDFS. As a hybrid of MPP database and Hadoop, it inherits the merits from both parties. It adopts a layered architecture and relies on the distributed file system for data replication and fault tolerance. In addition, it is standard SQL compliant, and unlike other SQL engines on Hadoop, it is fully transactional. This paper presents the novel design of HAWQ, including query processing, the scalable software interconnect based on UDP protocol, transaction management, fault tolerance, read optimized storage, the extensible framework for supporting various popular Hadoop based data stores and formats, and various optimization choices we considered to enhance the query performance. The extensive performance study shows that HAWQ is about 40x faster than Stinger, which is reported 35x-45x faster than the original Hive. Lei Chang, Zhanwei Wang, Lirong Jian, Alon Goldshuv, Luke Lonergan, Jeffrey Cohen, Caleb Welton, Gavin Sherry, Milind Bhandarkar |
SIGMOD Conference | 11 |
| 2013 | AptStore: Dynamic Storage Management for HadoopabstractTypical Hadoop setups employ Direct Attached Storage (DAS) with compute nodes and uniform replication of data to sustain high I/O throughput and fault tolerance. However, not all data is accessed at the same time or rate. Thus, if a large replication factor is used to support higher throughput for popular data, it wastes storage by unnecessarily replicating unpopular data as well. Conversely, if less replication is used to conserve storage for the unpopular data, it means fewer replicas for even popular data and thus lower I/O throughput. We present Apt Store, a dynamic data management system for Hadoop, which aims to improve overall I/O throughput while reducing storage cost. We design a tiered storage that uses the standard DAS for popular data to sustain high I/O throughput, and network-attached enterprise filers for cost-effective, fault-tolerant, but lower-throughput storage for unpopular data. We design a file Popularity Prediction Algorithm (PPA) that analyzes file system audit logs and predicts the appropriate storage policy of each file, as well as use the information for transparent data movement between tiers. Our evaluation of Apt Store on a real cluster shows 21.3% improvement in application execution time over standard Hadoop, while trace driven simulations show 23.7% increase in read throughput and 43.4% reduction in the storage capacity requirement of the system. Krish K. R., Aleksandr Khasymski, Ali Raza Butt, Sameer Tiwari, Milind Bhandarkar |
CloudCom (1) | 5 |
| 2013 | AptStore: Dynamic storage management for hadoopabstractTypical Hadoop setups employ Direct Attached Storage (DAS) with compute nodes and uniform replication of data to sustain high I/O throughput and fault tolerance. However, not all data is accessed at the same time or rate. Thus, if a large replication factor is used to support higher throughput for popular data, it wastes storage by unnecessarily replicating unpopular data as well. Conversely, if less replication is used to conserve storage for the unpopular data, it means fewer replicas for even popular data and thus lower I/O throughput. We present AptStore, a dynamic data management system for Hadoop, which aims to improve overall I/O throughput while reducing storage cost. We design a tiered storage that uses the standard DAS for popular data to sustain high I/O throughput, and network-attached enterprise filers for cost-effective, fault-tolerant, but lower-throughput storage for unpopular data. We design a file Popularity Predictor (PP) that analyzes file system audit logs and predicts the appropriate storage policy of each file, as well as use the information for transparent data movement between tiers. Our evaluation of AptStore on a real cluster shows 21.3% improvement in application execution time over standard Hadoop, while trace driven simulations show 23.7% increase in read throughput and 43.4% reduction in the storage capacity requirement of the system. Krish K. R., Aleksandr Khasymski, Ali Raza Butt, Sameer Tiwari, Milind Bhandarkar |
CLUSTER | 5 |
| 2013 | Hadoop: a view from the trenchesabstractFrom it's beginnings as a framework for building web crawlers for small-scale search engines to being one of the most promising technologies for building datacenter-scale distributed computing and storage platforms, Apache Hadoop has come far in the last seven years. In this talk I will reminisce about the early days of Hadoop, and will give an overview of the current state of the Hadoop ecosystem, and some real-world use cases of this open source platform. I will conclude with some crystal gazing in the future of Hadoop and associated technologies. Milind Bhandarkar |
KDD | 1 |