Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Karthik Prasad
dblp:134/6649
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Network and information security
1 paper |
Privacy and data protection · 100% | |
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Language models and text generation · 50% Efficient and distributed learning · 50% |
Topics — the 6 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
model merging |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | ParamΔ for Direct Mixing: Post-Train Large Language Model At Zero Cost · ICLR 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › large language model training
post-training |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | ParamΔ for Direct Mixing: Post-Train Large Language Model At Zero Cost · ICLR 2025 |
Privacy and data protection
differential privacy |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Antipodes of Label Differential Privacy: PATE and ALIBI · NeurIPS 2021 |
Privacy and data protection › differential privacy › relaxed differential privacy
label differential privacy |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Antipodes of Label Differential Privacy: PATE and ALIBI · NeurIPS 2021 |
Privacy and data protection › differential privacy › differentially private deep learning
PATE |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Antipodes of Label Differential Privacy: PATE and ALIBI · NeurIPS 2021 |
Privacy and data protection
privacy-preserving machine learning |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Antipodes of Label Differential Privacy: PATE and ALIBI · NeurIPS 2021 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
parameter mixing · 0.9semi-supervised learning · 0.5randomized response · 0.5laplace mechanism · 0.5bayesian inference · 0.5
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | ParamΔ for Direct Mixing: Post-Train Large Language Model At Zero Cost
Mingrui Wu, Karthik Prasad, Yuandong Tian, Zechun Liu |
ICLR | 3 |
| 2021 | Antipodes of Label Differential Privacy: PATE and ALIBIabstractWe consider the privacy-preserving machine learning (ML) setting where the trained model must satisfy differential privacy (DP) with respect to the labels of the training examples. We propose two novel approaches based on, respectively, the Laplace mechanism and the PATE framework, and demonstrate their effectiveness on standard benchmarks.While recent work by Ghazi et al. proposed Label DP schemes based on a randomized response mechanism, we argue that additive Laplace noise coupled with Bayesian inference (ALIBI) is a better fit for typical ML tasks. Moreover, we show how to achieve very strong privacy levels in some regimes, with our adaptation of the PATE framework that builds on recent advances in semi-supervised learning.We complement theoretical analysis of our algorithms' privacy guarantees with empirical evaluation of their memorization properties. Our evaluation suggests that comparing different algorithms according to their provable DP guarantees can be misleading and favor a less private algorithm with a tighter analysis.Code for implementation of algorithms and memorization attacks is available from https://github.com/facebookresearch/labeldpantipodes. Mani Malek 0001, Ilya Mironov, Karthik Prasad, Igor Shilov, Florian Tramèr |
NeurIPS | 3 |