Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Karthik Prasad

dblp:134/6649 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Network and information security
1 paper
Privacy and data protection · 100%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Language models and text generation · 50% Efficient and distributed learning · 50%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
model merging
0.912025
ParamΔ for Direct Mixing: Post-Train Large Language Model At Zero Cost · ICLR 2025
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › large language model training
post-training
0.912025
ParamΔ for Direct Mixing: Post-Train Large Language Model At Zero Cost · ICLR 2025
Privacy and data protection
differential privacy
0.512021
Antipodes of Label Differential Privacy: PATE and ALIBI · NeurIPS 2021
Privacy and data protection › differential privacy › relaxed differential privacy
label differential privacy
0.512021
Antipodes of Label Differential Privacy: PATE and ALIBI · NeurIPS 2021
Privacy and data protection › differential privacy › differentially private deep learning
PATE
0.512021
Antipodes of Label Differential Privacy: PATE and ALIBI · NeurIPS 2021
Privacy and data protection
privacy-preserving machine learning
0.512021
Antipodes of Label Differential Privacy: PATE and ALIBI · NeurIPS 2021

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

parameter mixing · 0.9semi-supervised learning · 0.5randomized response · 0.5laplace mechanism · 0.5bayesian inference · 0.5
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 ParamΔ for Direct Mixing: Post-Train Large Language Model At Zero Cost
Mingrui Wu, Karthik Prasad, Yuandong Tian, Zechun Liu
ICLR3
2021 Antipodes of Label Differential Privacy: PATE and ALIBI
abstract
We consider the privacy-preserving machine learning (ML) setting where the trained model must satisfy differential privacy (DP) with respect to the labels of the training examples. We propose two novel approaches based on, respectively, the Laplace mechanism and the PATE framework, and demonstrate their effectiveness on standard benchmarks.While recent work by Ghazi et al. proposed Label DP schemes based on a randomized response mechanism, we argue that additive Laplace noise coupled with Bayesian inference (ALIBI) is a better fit for typical ML tasks. Moreover, we show how to achieve very strong privacy levels in some regimes, with our adaptation of the PATE framework that builds on recent advances in semi-supervised learning.We complement theoretical analysis of our algorithms' privacy guarantees with empirical evaluation of their memorization properties. Our evaluation suggests that comparing different algorithms according to their provable DP guarantees can be misleading and favor a less private algorithm with a tighter analysis.Code for implementation of algorithms and memorization attacks is available from https://github.com/facebookresearch/labeldpantipodes.
Mani Malek 0001, Ilya Mironov, Karthik Prasad, Igor Shilov, Florian Tramèr
NeurIPS3