Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Praveen Manoharan 0001
dblp:134/8943
· DBLP profile ↗
6ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
—ORCID · conflict
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Security and privacy · 6
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Network and information security
2 papers |
Privacy and data protection · 86% Security and privacy of machine learning · 14% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Graph data management · 100% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% |
Topics — the 8 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Privacy and data protection
anonymization |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Towards Plausible Graph Anonymization · NDSS 2020 |
Privacy and data protection › anonymization
graph anonymization |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Towards Plausible Graph Anonymization · NDSS 2020 |
Privacy and data protection › health data privacy
genomic privacy |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Membership Privacy in MicroRNA-based Studies · CCS 2016 |
Security and privacy of machine learning
membership inference |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Membership Privacy in MicroRNA-based Studies · CCS 2016 |
Privacy and data protection
privacy-preserving data analysis |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Membership Privacy in MicroRNA-based Studies · CCS 2016 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › gene expression analysis
microRNA expression analysis |
0.1 | 1 | 2016 | Membership Privacy in MicroRNA-based Studies · CCS 2016 |
Privacy and data protection › differential privacy › privacy mechanism design
differentially private mechanism |
0.1 | 1 | 2016 | Membership Privacy in MicroRNA-based Studies · CCS 2016 |
Privacy and data protection
differential privacy |
0.1 | 1 | 2016 | Membership Privacy in MicroRNA-based Studies · CCS 2016 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
likelihood ratio test · 0.5l1 distance · 0.5differential privacy · 0.5
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | Towards Plausible Graph Anonymization
Yang Zhang 0016, Mathias Humbert, Bartlomiej Surma, Praveen Manoharan 0001, Jilles Vreeken, Michael Backes 0001 |
NDSS | 4 |
| 2017 | Reconciling Privacy and Utility in Continuous-Time Diffusion NetworksabstractSocial Networks and other social media systems are an ever popular medium that allow users to freely communicate and interact with their peers. Once a user shares a piece of information, however, the transitive propagation of information in such systems can allow this information to spread quickly throughout the whole system. Due to the potentially sensitive nature of the shared information, users naturally have an interest in controlling the propagation of information to ensure privacy. At the same time, users also have utility requirements in terms of users they want to share a certain piece of information with, which naturally causes a conflict with the privacy requirements.,,In this paper, we tackle the issue of controlling the propagation of information through a social network while at the same time maintaining utility requirements set by the user. We leverage continuous-time diffusion networks to model the global propagation behavior in social networks and define combined privacy and utility policies that allow us to enforce privacy under utility restrictions, and vice versa. We show that optimally satisfying such policies corresponds to solving a constrained submodular minimization problem, which, while NP-hard, allows for a constant factor approximation due to the structure of our objective function. Michael Backes 0001, Manuel Gomez-Rodriguez, Praveen Manoharan 0001, Bartlomiej Surma |
CSF | 3 |
| 2017 | Adversarial Examples for Malware Detection
Kathrin Grosse, Nicolas Papernot, Praveen Manoharan 0001, Michael Backes 0001, Patrick D. McDaniel |
ESORICS (2) | 3 |
| 2016 | Membership Privacy in MicroRNA-based StudiesabstractThe continuous decrease in cost of molecular profiling tests is revolutionizing medical research and practice, but it also raises new privacy concerns. One of the first attacks against privacy of biological data, proposed by Homer et al. in 2008, showed that, by knowing parts of the genome of a given individual and summary statistics of a genome-based study, it is possible to detect if this individual participated in the study. Since then, a lot of work has been carried out to further study the theoretical limits and to counter the genome-based membership inference attack. However, genomic data are by no means the only or the most influential biological data threatening personal privacy. For instance, whereas the genome informs us about the risk of developing some diseases in the future, epigenetic biomarkers, such as microRNAs, are directly and deterministically affected by our health condition including most common severe diseases. In this paper, we show that the membership inference attack also threatens the privacy of individuals contributing their microRNA expressions to scientific studies. Our results on real and public microRNA expression data demonstrate that disease-specific datasets are especially prone to membership detection, offering a true-positive rate of up to 77% at a false-negative rate of less than 1%. We present two attacks: one relying on the L_1 distance and the other based on the likelihood-ratio test. We show that the likelihood-ratio test provides the highest adversarial success and we derive a theoretical limit on this success. In order to mitigate the membership inference, we propose and evaluate both a differentially private mechanism and a hiding mechanism. We also consider two types of adversarial prior knowledge for the differentially private mechanism and show that, for relatively large datasets, this mechanism can protect the privacy of participants in miRNA-based studies against strong adversaries without degrading the data utility too much. Based on our findings and given the current number of miRNAs, we recommend to only release summary statistics of datasets containing at least a couple of hundred individuals. Michael Backes 0001, Pascal Berrang, Mathias Humbert, Praveen Manoharan 0001 |
CCS | 4 |
| 2014 | TUC: Time-Sensitive and Modular Analysis of Anonymous CommunicationabstractThe anonymous communication protocol Tor constitutes the most widely deployed technology for providing anonymity for user communication over the Internet. Several frameworks have been proposed that show strong anonymity guarantees, none of these, however, are capable of modeling the class of traffic-related timing attacks against Tor, such as traffic correlation and website fingerprinting. In this work, we present TUC: the first framework that allows for establishing strong anonymity guarantees in the presence of time-sensitive adversaries that mount traffic-related timing attacks. TUC incorporates a comprehensive notion of time in an asynchronous communication model with sequential activation, while offering strong compositionality properties for security proofs. We apply TUC to evaluate a novel countermeasure for Tor against website fingerprinting attacks. Our analysis relies on a formalization of the onion routing protocol that underlies Tor and proves rigorous anonymity guarantees in the presence of traffic-related timing attacks. Michael Backes 0001, Praveen Manoharan 0001, Esfandiar Mohammadi |
CSF | 2 |
| 2013 | AnoA: A Framework for Analyzing Anonymous Communication ProtocolsabstractProtecting individuals' privacy in online communications has become a challenge of paramount importance. To this end, anonymous communication (AC) protocols such as the widely used Tor network have been designed to provide anonymity to their participating users. While AC protocols have been the subject of several security and anonymity analyses in the last years, there still does not exist a framework for analyzing complex systems such as Tor and their different anonymity properties in a unified manner. In this work we present AnoA: a generic framework for defining, analyzing, and quantifying anonymity properties for AC protocols. AnoA relies on a novel relaxation of the notion of (computational) differential privacy, and thereby enables a unified quantitative analysis of well-established anonymity properties, such as sender anonymity, sender unlinkability, and relationship anonymity. While an anonymity analysis in AnoA can be conducted in a purely information theoretical manner, we show that the protocol's anonymity properties established in AnoA carry over to secure cryptographic instantiations of the protocol. We exemplify the applicability of AnoA for analyzing real-life systems by conducting a thorough analysis of the anonymity properties provided by the Tor network against passive attackers. Our analysis significantly improves on known anonymity results from the literature. Michael Backes 0001, Aniket Kate, Praveen Manoharan 0001, Sebastian Meiser 0001, Esfandiar Mohammadi |
CSF | 3 |