Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Renaud Richardet

dblp:134/9023 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2015
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2 · 2 first-authorArtificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-authorDatabases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology › computational neuroscience › brain connectivity analysis
brain connectivity estimation
0.212015
Large-scale extraction of brain connectivity from the neuroscientific literature · Bioinform. 2015
Bioinformatics and computational biology › neuroscience
neuroinformatics
0.212015
Large-scale extraction of brain connectivity from the neuroscientific literature · Bioinform. 2015
Bioinformatics and computational biology
biomedical text mining
0.112015
Large-scale extraction of brain connectivity from the neuroscientific literature · Bioinform. 2015
Bioinformatics and computational biology › biomedical text mining
named entity recognition
0.112015
Large-scale extraction of brain connectivity from the neuroscientific literature · Bioinform. 2015

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

text mining · 0.2named entity recognition · 0.2atlas normalization · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2015 Agile text mining with Sherlok
abstract
The successful development of an intelligent text mining application requires the collaboration of two main stakeholders: subject matter experts and text miners. In this paper, we describe a new methodology, agile text mining to improve that collaboration. Agile text mining is characterized by short development cycles, frequent tasks redefinition and continuous performance monitoring through integration tests. We introduce Sherlok, a system supporting the development of agile text mining applications and present an application to extract mention of neurons from a very large corpus of scientific articles. The resulting code and models are publicly available.
Renaud Richardet, Jean-Cédric Chappelier, Shreejoy J. Tripathy, Sean L. Hill
IEEE BigData1
2015 Large-scale extraction of brain connectivity from the neuroscientific literature
abstract
MOTIVATION: In neuroscience, as in many other scientific domains, the primary form of knowledge dissemination is through published articles. One challenge for modern neuroinformatics is finding methods to make the knowledge from the tremendous backlog of publications accessible for search, analysis and the integration of such data into computational models. A key example of this is metascale brain connectivity, where results are not reported in a normalized repository. Instead, these experimental results are published in natural language, scattered among individual scientific publications. This lack of normalization and centralization hinders the large-scale integration of brain connectivity results. In this article, we present text-mining models to extract and aggregate brain connectivity results from 13.2 million PubMed abstracts and 630 216 full-text publications related to neuroscience. The brain regions are identified with three different named entity recognizers (NERs) and then normalized against two atlases: the Allen Brain Atlas (ABA) and the atlas from the Brain Architecture Management System (BAMS). We then use three different extractors to assess inter-region connectivity. RESULTS: NERs and connectivity extractors are evaluated against a manually annotated corpus. The complete in litero extraction models are also evaluated against in vivo connectivity data from ABA with an estimated precision of 78%. The resulting database contains over 4 million brain region mentions and over 100 000 (ABA) and 122 000 (BAMS) potential brain region connections. This database drastically accelerates connectivity literature review, by providing a centralized repository of connectivity data to neuroscientists.
Renaud Richardet, Jean-Cédric Chappelier, Martin Telefont, Sean L. Hill
Bioinform.1