EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Won Seob Jeong
dblp:135/0712
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Systems, architecture and hardware · 3 · 1 first-authorSoftware engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
2 papers |
Storage systems · 62% Distributed systems · 19% Hardware accelerators and domain-specific architectures · 19% |
Topics — the 9 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Distributed systems › fault tolerance
checkpointing |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Check-In: In-Storage Checkpointing for Key-Value Store System Leveraging Flash-Based SSDs · ISCA 2020 |
Storage systems › flash and SSD › solid-state drive
flash-based SSD |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Check-In: In-Storage Checkpointing for Key-Value Store System Leveraging Flash-Based SSDs · ISCA 2020 |
Storage systems › flash and SSD › flash memory management
flash translation layer |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Check-In: In-Storage Checkpointing for Key-Value Store System Leveraging Flash-Based SSDs · ISCA 2020 |
Storage systems › computational storage
in-storage computing |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | REACT: Scalable and High-Performance Regular Expression Pattern Matching Accelerator for In-Storage Processing · IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst. 2020 |
Storage systems
key-value storage |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Check-In: In-Storage Checkpointing for Key-Value Store System Leveraging Flash-Based SSDs · ISCA 2020 |
Hardware accelerators and domain-specific architectures › pattern matching accelerator
regular expression matching accelerator |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | REACT: Scalable and High-Performance Regular Expression Pattern Matching Accelerator for In-Storage Processing · IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst. 2020 |
Distributed systems
data consistency |
0.1 | 1 | 2020 | Check-In: In-Storage Checkpointing for Key-Value Store System Leveraging Flash-Based SSDs · ISCA 2020 |
Hardware accelerators and domain-specific architectures
pattern matching accelerator |
0.1 | 1 | 2020 | REACT: Scalable and High-Performance Regular Expression Pattern Matching Accelerator for In-Storage Processing · IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst. 2020 |
Storage systems
storage reliability |
0.1 | 1 | 2020 | Check-In: In-Storage Checkpointing for Key-Value Store System Leveraging Flash-Based SSDs · ISCA 2020 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
parallel processing architecture · 0.4journaling · 0.4in-storage checkpointing · 0.4data access scheduling · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | Check-In: In-Storage Checkpointing for Key-Value Store System Leveraging Flash-Based SSDsabstractPersistent key-value store supports journaling and checkpointing to maintain data consistency and to prevent data loss. However, conventional data consistency mechanisms are not suitable for efficient management of flash memories in SSDs due to that they write the same data twice and induce redundant flash operations. As a result, query processing is delayed by heavy traffics during checkpointing. The checkpointing accompanies many write operations by nature, and a write operation consumes severe time and energy in SSDs; worse, it can introduce the write amplification problem and shorten the lifetime of the flash memory. In this paper, we propose an in-storage checkpointing mechanism, named Check-In, based on the cooperation between the storage engine of a host and the flash translation layer (FTL) of an SSD. Compared to the existing mechanism, our proposed mechanism reduces the tail latency due to checkpointing by 92.1 % and reduces the number of duplicate writes by 94.3 %. Overall, the average throughput and latency are improved by 8.1 % and 10.2 %, respectively. Joohyeong Yoon, Won Seob Jeong, Won Woo Ro |
ISCA | 2 |
| 2020 | REACT: Scalable and High-Performance Regular Expression Pattern Matching Accelerator for In-Storage ProcessingabstractThis article proposes REACT, a regular expression matching accelerator, which can be embedded in a modern Solid-State Drive (SSD) and a novel data access scheduling algorithm for high matching throughput. Specifically, REACT, including our data access scheduling algorithm, increases the utilization of SSD and the degree of internal memory parallelism for pattern matching processes. While the low-level flash exhibits long latency, modern SSDs in practice achieve high I/O performance by utilizing the massive internal parallelism at the system-level. However, exploiting the parallelism is limited for pattern matching since the subblocks, which constitute an input data and can be placed in multiple flash pages, should be tested in a sequence to process the input correctly. This limitation can induce low utilization of the accelerator. To address this challenge, the proposed REACT simultaneously processes multiple input streams with a parallel processing architecture to maximize matching throughput by hiding the long and irregular latency. The scheduling algorithm finds a data stream which requires a sub-block in closest time and prioritizes the access request to reduce the data stall of REACT. REACT achieves maximum 22.6 percent of matching throughput improvement on a 16channel high-performance SSD compared to the accelerator without the proposed scheduling algorithm. Won Seob Jeong, Changmin Lee 0002, Keunsoo Kim, Myung Kuk Yoon, Won Jeon, Myoungsoo Jung, Won Woo Ro |
IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst. | 1 |
| 2013 | Design and evaluation of random linear network coding Accelerators on FPGAs
Won Seob Jeong, Won Woo Ro, Jean-Luc Gaudiot |
ACM Trans. Embed. Comput. Syst. | 2 |