Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Michael Caldara

dblp:135/3801 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Planning, search and constraint satisfaction · 63% Reinforcement learning · 18% Trustworthy machine learning · 18%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction
multi-agent path finding
1.012026
Symbolic Planning and Multi-Agent Path Finding in Extremely Dense Environments with Unassigned Agents · AAAI 2026
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction
search-based planning
1.012026
Symbolic Planning and Multi-Agent Path Finding in Extremely Dense Environments with Unassigned Agents · AAAI 2026
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction › planning
symbolic planning
1.012026
Symbolic Planning and Multi-Agent Path Finding in Extremely Dense Environments with Unassigned Agents · AAAI 2026
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
distributionally robust optimization
0.912025
Distributionally Robust Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning for Dynamic Chute Mapping · ICML 2025
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
multi-agent reinforcement learning
0.912025
Distributionally Robust Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning for Dynamic Chute Mapping · ICML 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

expert heuristics · 1.0distributionally robust optimization · 0.9contextual bandit · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Symbolic Planning and Multi-Agent Path Finding in Extremely Dense Environments with Unassigned Agents
abstract
We introduce the Block Rearrangement Problem (BRaP), a challenging component of large warehouse management which involves rearranging storage blocks within dense grids to achieve a goal state. We formally define the BRaP as a graph search problem. Building on intuitions from sliding puzzle problems, we propose five search-based solution algorithms, leveraging joint configuration space search, classical planning, multi-agent pathfinding, and expert heuristics. We evaluate the five approaches empirically for plan quality and scalability. Despite the exponential relation between search space size and block number, our methods demonstrate efficiency in creating rearrangement plans for deeply buried blocks in up to 80x80 grids.
Zhe Chen 0016, Rahul Chandan, Alexandre O. G. Barbosa, Michael Caldara, Joey W. Durham, Federico Pecora
AAAI5
2025 Distributionally Robust Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning for Dynamic Chute Mapping
abstract
In Amazon robotic warehouses, the destination-to-chute mapping problem is crucial for efficient package sorting. Often, however, this problem is complicated by uncertain and dynamic package induction rates, which can lead to increased package recirculation. To tackle this challenge, we introduce a Distributionally Robust Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning (DRMARL) framework that learns a destination-to-chute mapping policy that is resilient to adversarial variations in induction rates. Specifically, DRMARL relies on group distributionally robust optimization (DRO) to learn a policy that performs well not only on average but also on each individual subpopulation of induction rates within the group that capture, for example, different seasonality or operation modes of the system. This approach is then combined with a novel contextual bandit-based estimator of the worst-case induction distribution for each state-action pair, significantly reducing the cost of exploration and thereby increasing the learning efficiency and scalability of our framework. Extensive simulations demonstrate that DRMARL achieves robust chute mapping in the presence of varying induction distributions, reducing package recirculation by an average of 80% in the simulation scenario.
Suzan Iloglu, Michael Caldara, Joseph W. Durham, Michael M. Zavlanos
ICML3