Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Sergey Hardock

dblp:135/4703 · also Sergej Hardock · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
13ranked-venue papers
7as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 13 · 7 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
5 papers
Indexing and storage engines · 47% Database system architecture and tuning · 30% Graph data management · 13%
Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
5 papers
Storage systems · 100%

Topics — the 10 heaviest of 13, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Storage systems
flash and SSD
0.952019
From In-Place Updates to In-Place Appends: Revisiting Out-of-Place Updates on Flash · SIGMOD Conference 2017
Selective In-Place Appends for Real: Reducing Erases on Wear-prone DBMS Storage · ICDE 2017
NoFTL: Database Systems on FTL-less Flash Storage · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2013
Indexing and storage engines
storage management
0.732019
Native Storage Techniques for Data Management · ICDE 2019
DBMS on modern storage hardware · ICDE 2015
Selective In-Place Appends for Real: Reducing Erases on Wear-prone DBMS Storage · ICDE 2017
Database system architecture and tuning › hardware acceleration for data management
near-data processing
0.412020
nKV in Action: Accelerating KV-Stores on NativeComputational Storage with Near-Data Processing · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2020
Storage systems
in-place update
0.312017
From In-Place Updates to In-Place Appends: Revisiting Out-of-Place Updates on Flash · SIGMOD Conference 2017
Storage systems
storage reliability
0.312017
Selective In-Place Appends for Real: Reducing Erases on Wear-prone DBMS Storage · ICDE 2017
Storage systems › flash and SSD › flash memory management › garbage collection
write amplification
0.312017
From In-Place Updates to In-Place Appends: Revisiting Out-of-Place Updates on Flash · SIGMOD Conference 2017
Transaction processing and concurrency control › concurrency control
multiversion concurrency control
0.212015
DBMS on modern storage hardware · ICDE 2015
Storage systems › flash and SSD › flash memory management
flash translation layer
0.212013
NoFTL: Database Systems on FTL-less Flash Storage · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2013
Graph data management › graph algorithms
betweenness centrality
0.112020
nKV in Action: Accelerating KV-Stores on NativeComputational Storage with Near-Data Processing · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2020
Graph data management
graph processing
0.112020
nKV in Action: Accelerating KV-Stores on NativeComputational Storage with Near-Data Processing · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2020

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

log analysis · 0.6native flash access · 0.3FTL integration · 0.3workload characterization · 0.3
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2020 nKV in Action: Accelerating KV-Stores on NativeComputational Storage with Near-Data Processing
abstract
Massive data transfers in modern data-intensive systems resulting from low data-locality and data-to-code system design hurt their performance and scalability. Near-data processing (NDP) designs represent a feasible solution, which although not new, has yet to see widespread use. In this paper we demonstrate various NDP alternatives in nKV, which is a key/value store utilizing native computational storage and near-data processing. We showcase the execution of classical operations ( GET, SCAN ) and complex graph-processing algorithms ( Betweenness Centrality ) in-situ, with 1.4x-2.7x better performance due to NDP. nKV runs on real hardware - the COSMOS+ platform.
Tobias Vinçon, Lukas Weber, Arthur Bernhardt, Andreas Koch 0001, Ilia Petrov 0001, Christian Knödler, Sergey Hardock, Sajjad Tamimi, Christian Riegger
Proc. VLDB Endow.7
2019 nativeNDP: Processing Big Data Analytics on Native Storage Nodes
Tobias Vinçon, Sergey Hardock, Christian Riegger, Andreas Koch 0001, Ilia Petrov 0001
ADBIS2
2019 IPA-IDX: In-Place Appends for B-Tree Indices
abstract
We introduce IPA-IDX – an approach to handle index modifications modern storage technologies (NVM, Flash) as physical in-place appends, using simplified physiological log records. IPA-IDX provides similar performance and longevity advantages for indexes as basic IPA [5] does for tables. The selective application of IPA-IDX and basic IPA to certain regions and objects, lowers the GC overhead by over 60%, while keeping the total space overhead to 2%. The combined effect of IPA and IPA-IDX increases performance by 28%.
Sergey Hardock, Andreas Koch 0001, Tobias Vinçon, Ilia Petrov 0001
DaMoN1
2019 Native Storage Techniques for Data Management
abstract
In the present tutorial we perform a cross-cut analysis of database storage management from the perspective of modern storage technologies. We argue that neither the design of modern DBMS, nor the architecture of modern storage technologies are aligned with each other. Moreover, the majority of the systems rely on a complex multi-layer and compatibility-oriented storage stack. The result is needlessly suboptimal DBMS performance, inefficient utilization, or significant write amplification due to outdated abstractions and interfaces. In the present tutorial we focus on the concept of native storage, which is storage operated without intermediate abstraction layers over an open native storage interface and is directly controlled by the DBMS. We cover the following aspects of native storage: (i) architectural approaches and techniques; (ii) interfaces; (iii) storage abstractions; (iv) DBMS/system integration; (v) in-storage processing.
Ilia Petrov 0001, Andreas Koch 0001, Sergey Hardock, Tobias Vinçon, Christian Riegger
ICDE3
2018 NoFTL-KV: TacklingWrite-Amplification on KV-Stores with Native Storage Management
abstract
Modern persistent Key/Value stores are designed to meet the demand for high transactional throughput and high data ingestion rates. Still, they rely on backwards-compatible storage stack and abstractions to ease space management, foster seamless proliferation and system integration. Their dependence on the traditional I/O stack has negative impact on performance, causes unacceptably high write-amplification, and limits the storage longevity. In the present paper we present NoFTL KV, an approach that results in a lean I/O stack, integrating physical storage management natively in the Key/Value store. NoFTL-KV eliminates backwards compatibility, allowing the Key/Value store to directly consume the characteristics of modern storage technologies. NoFTLKV is implemented under RocksDB. The performance evaluation under LinkBench shows that NoFTL-KV improves transactional throughput by 33%, while response times improve up to 2.3x. Furthermore, NoFTL KV reduces write-amplification 19x and improves storage longevity by imately the same factor.
Tobias Vinçon, Sergey Hardock, Christian Riegger, Julian Oppermann, Andreas Koch 0001, Ilia Petrov 0001
EDBT2
2017 In-Place Appends for Real: DBMS Overwrites on Flash without Erase
abstract
In the present paper we demonstrate a novel approach to handling small updates on Flash called In-Place Appends (IPA). It allows the DBMS to revisit the traditional write behavior on Flash. Instead of writing whole database pages upon an update in an out-of-place manner on Flash, we transform those small updates into update deltas and append them to a reserved area on the very same physical Flash page. In doing so we utilize the commonly ignored fact that under certain conditions Flash memories can support in-place updates to Flash pages without a preceding erase operation. The approach was implemented under Shore-MT and evaluated on real hardware. Under standard update-intensive workloads we observed 67% less page invalidations resulting in 80% lower garbage collection overhead, which yields a 45% increase in transactional throughput, while doubling Flash longevity at the same time. The IPA outperforms In-Page Logging (IPL) by more than 50%. We showcase a Shore-MT based prototype of the above approach, operating on real Flash hardware – the OpenSSD Flash research platform. During the demonstration we allow the users to interact with the system and gain hands on experience of its performance under different demonstration scenarios. These involve various workloads such as TPC-B, TPC-C or TATP.
Sergey Hardock, Ilia Petrov 0001, Robert Gottstein, Alejandro P. Buchmann
EDBT1
2017 Selective In-Place Appends for Real: Reducing Erases on Wear-prone DBMS Storage
abstract
In the present paper we demonstrate the novel technique to apply the recently proposed approach of In-Place Appends - overwrites on Flash without a prior erase operation. IPA can be applied selectively: only to DB-objects that have frequent and relatively small updates. To do so we couple IPA to the concept of NoFTL regions, allowing the DBA to place update-intensive DB-objects into special IPA-enabled regions. The decision about region configuration can be (semi-)automated by an advisor analyzing DB-log files in the background.
Sergey Hardock, Ilia Petrov 0001, Robert Gottstein, Alejandro P. Buchmann
ICDE1
2017 From In-Place Updates to In-Place Appends: Revisiting Out-of-Place Updates on Flash
abstract
Under update intensive workloads (TPC, LinkBench) small updates dominate the write behavior, e.g. 70% of all updates change less than 10 bytes across all TPC OLTP workloads. These are typically performed as in-place updates and result in random writes in page-granularity, causing major write-overhead on Flash storage, a write amplification of several hundred times and lower device longevity.
Sergey Hardock, Ilia Petrov 0001, Robert Gottstein, Alejandro P. Buchmann
SIGMOD Conference1
2016 Revisiting DBMS Space Management for Native Flash
abstract
In this paper we present our work in progress on revisiting traditional DBMS mechanisms to manage space on native Flash and how it is administered by the DBA. Our observations and initial results show that: the standard logical database structures can be used for physical organization of data on native Flash; at the same time higher DBMS performance is achieved without incurring extra DBA overhead. Initial experimental evaluation indicates a 20% increase in transactional throughput under TPC-C, by performing intelligent data placement on Flash, less erase operations and thus better Flash longevity.
Sergey Hardock, Ilia Petrov 0001, Robert Gottstein, Alejandro P. Buchmann
EDBT1
2015 NoFTL for Real: Databases on Real Native Flash Storage
abstract
Flash SSDs are omnipresent as database storage. HDD replacement is seamless since Flash SSDs implement the same legacy hardware and software interfaces to enable backward compatibility. Yet, the price paid is high as backward compatibility masks the native behaviour, incurs significant complexity and decreases I/O performance, making it non-robust and unpredictable. Flash SSDs are black-boxes. Although DBMS have ample mechanisms to control hardware directly and utilize the performance potential of Flash memory, the legacy interfaces and black-box architecture of Flash devices prevent them from doing so. In this paper we demonstrate NoFTL, an approach that enables native Flash access and integrates parts of the Flashmanagement functionality into the DBMS yielding significant performance increase and simplification of the I/O stack. NoFTL is implemented on real hardware based on the OpenSSD research platform. The contributions of this paper include: (i) a description of the NoFTL native Flash storage architecture; (ii) its integration in Shore-MT and (iii) performance evaluation of NoFTL on a real Flash SSD and on an on-line data-driven Flash emulator under TPCB, C,E and H workloads. The performance evaluation results indicate an improvement of at least 2.4x on real hardware over conventional Flash storage; as well as better utilisation of native Flash parallelism.
Sergey Hardock, Ilia Petrov 0001, Robert Gottstein, Alejandro P. Buchmann
EDBT1
2015 DBMS on modern storage hardware
abstract
In the present tutorial we perform a cross-cut analysis of database systems from the perspective of modern storage technology, namely Flash memory. We argue that neither the design of modern DBMS, nor the architecture of Flash storage technologies are aligned with each other. The result is needlessly suboptimal DBMS performance and inefficient Flash utilisation as well as low Flash storage endurance and reliability. We showcase new DBMS approaches with improved algorithms and leaner architectures, designed to leverage the properties of modern storage technologies. We cover the area of transaction management and multi-versioning, putting a special emphasis on: (i) version organisation models and invalidation mechanisms in multi-versioning DBMS; (ii) Flash storage management especially on append-based storage in tuple granularity; (iii) Flash-friendly buffer management; as well as (iv) improvements in the searching and indexing models. Furthermore, we present our NoFTL approach to native Flash access that integrates parts of the Flash-management functionality into the DBMS yielding significant performance increase and simplification of the I/O stack. In addition, we cover the basics of building large Flash storage for DBMS and revisit some of the RAID techniques and principles.
Ilia Petrov 0001, Robert Gottstein, Sergey Hardock
ICDE3
2014 MV-IDX: indexing in multi-version databases
abstract
An index in a Multi-Version DBMS (MV-DBMS) has to reflect different tuple versions of a single data item. Existing approaches follow the paradigm of logically separating the tuple version data from the data item, e.g. an index is only allowed to return at most one version of a single data item (while it may return multiple data items that match a search criteria). Hence to determine the valid (and therefore visible) tuple version of a data item, the MV-DBMS first fetches all tuple versions that match the search criteria and subsequently filters visible versions using visibility checks. This involves I/O storage accesses to tuple versions that do not have to be fetched. In this vision paper we present the Multi-Version Index (MV-IDX) approach that allows index-only visibility checks which significantly reduce the amount of I/O storage accesses as well as the index maintenance overhead. The MV-IDX achieves significantly lower response times and higher transactional throughput on OLTP workloads.
Robert Gottstein, Rohit Goyal, Sergey Hardock, Ilia Petrov 0001, Alejandro P. Buchmann
IDEAS3
2013 NoFTL: Database Systems on FTL-less Flash Storage
abstract
The database architecture and workhorse algorithms have been designed to compensate for hard disk properties. The I/O characteristics of Flash memories have significant impact on database systems and many algorithms and approaches taking advantage of those have been proposed recently. Nonetheless on system level Flash storage devices are still treated as HDD compatible block devices, black boxes and fast HDD replacements. This backwards compatibility (both software and hardware) masks the native behaviour, incurs significant complexity and decreases I/O performance, making it non-robust and unpredictable. Database systems have a long tradition of operating directly on RAW storage natively, utilising the physical characteristics of storage media to improve performance. In this paper we demonstrate an approach called NoFTL that goes a step further. We show that allowing for native Flash access and integrating parts of the FTL functionality into the database system yields significant performance increase and simplification of the I/O stack. We created a real-time data-driven Flash emulator and integrated it accordingly into Shore-MT. We demonstrate a performance improvement of up to 3.7× compared to Shore-MT on RAW block-device Flash storage under various TPC workloads.
Sergey Hardock, Ilia Petrov 0001, Robert Gottstein, Alejandro P. Buchmann
Proc. VLDB Endow.1