Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Sadeep Jayasumana
dblp:135/4884
· DBLP profile ↗
16ranked-venue papers
7as first author
6since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 15 · 7 first-author · 6 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 10 · 6 first-author · 2 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
12 papers |
Generative modeling · 23% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 21% Deep learning architectures and training · 13% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
2 papers |
Information retrieval · 100% |
Topics — the 30 heaviest of 36, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Information retrieval › retrieval models › neural retrieval › dense retrieval
bi-encoder retrieval |
1.3 | 2 | 2024 | USTAD: Unified Single-model Training Achieving Diverse Scores for Information Retrieval · ICML 2024 In defense of dual-encoders for neural ranking · ICML 2022 |
Information retrieval
retrieval models |
1.3 | 2 | 2024 | USTAD: Unified Single-model Training Achieving Diverse Scores for Information Retrieval · ICML 2024 In defense of dual-encoders for neural ranking · ICML 2022 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model
text-to-image generation |
1.0 | 2 | 2024 | MarkovGen: Structured Prediction for Efficient Text-to-Image Generation · CVPR 2024 Rethinking FID: Towards a Better Evaluation Metric for Image Generation · CVPR 2024 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference
distribution distance estimation |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Rethinking FID: Towards a Better Evaluation Metric for Image Generation · CVPR 2024 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › generative model evaluation
image generation evaluation |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Rethinking FID: Towards a Better Evaluation Metric for Image Generation · CVPR 2024 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model compression
knowledge distillation |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | USTAD: Unified Single-model Training Achieving Diverse Scores for Information Retrieval · ICML 2024 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models › graphical models
markov random field |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | MarkovGen: Structured Prediction for Efficient Text-to-Image Generation · CVPR 2024 |
Information retrieval › reranking
cross-encoder reranking |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | USTAD: Unified Single-model Training Achieving Diverse Scores for Information Retrieval · ICML 2024 |
Information retrieval › retrieval models › neural retrieval
dense retrieval |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | USTAD: Unified Single-model Training Achieving Diverse Scores for Information Retrieval · ICML 2024 |
Information retrieval
ranking |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | USTAD: Unified Single-model Training Achieving Diverse Scores for Information Retrieval · ICML 2024 |
Machine learning › Learning paradigms
class imbalance |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Disentangling Sampling and Labeling Bias for Learning in Large-output Spaces · ICML 2021 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
fairness |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Long-tail learning via logit adjustment · ICLR 2021 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › loss function design
logit adjustment |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Long-tail learning via logit adjustment · ICLR 2021 |
Machine learning › Learning paradigms › class imbalance
long-tailed learning |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Long-tail learning via logit adjustment · ICLR 2021 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
loss function design |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Long-tail learning via logit adjustment · ICLR 2021 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › contrastive learning
negative sampling |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Disentangling Sampling and Labeling Bias for Learning in Large-output Spaces · ICML 2021 |
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods
kernel methods |
0.4 | 2 | 2015 | Kernel Methods on Riemannian Manifolds with Gaussian RBF Kernels · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2015 Expanding the Family of Grassmannian Kernels: An Embedding Perspective · ECCV (7) 2014 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning
structured prediction |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Higher Order Conditional Random Fields in Deep Neural Networks · ECCV (2) 2016 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
diffusion model |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | MarkovGen: Structured Prediction for Efficient Text-to-Image Generation · CVPR 2024 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model › diffusion model acceleration
sampling acceleration |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | MarkovGen: Structured Prediction for Efficient Text-to-Image Generation · CVPR 2024 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
convolutional neural network |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | Conditional Random Fields as Recurrent Neural Networks · ICCV 2015 |
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding
semantic segmentation |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | Conditional Random Fields as Recurrent Neural Networks · ICCV 2015 |
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods › kernel methods
kernel learning |
0.2 | 1 | 2014 | Optimizing over Radial Kernels on Compact Manifolds · CVPR 2014 |
Geometric modeling and processing
shape analysis |
0.2 | 1 | 2013 | A Framework for Shape Analysis via Hilbert Space Embedding · ICCV 2013 |
Geometric modeling and processing › shape analysis
shape classification |
0.2 | 1 | 2013 | A Framework for Shape Analysis via Hilbert Space Embedding · ICCV 2013 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured prediction
deep structured model |
0.1 | 1 | 2016 | Higher Order Conditional Random Fields in Deep Neural Networks · ECCV (2) 2016 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured prediction
conditional random field |
0.1 | 1 | 2015 | Conditional Random Fields as Recurrent Neural Networks · ICCV 2015 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models
graphical models |
0.1 | 1 | 2015 | Conditional Random Fields as Recurrent Neural Networks · ICCV 2015 |
Computer vision › 3D vision › geometric deep learning
manifold-valued data |
0.1 | 1 | 2015 | Kernel Methods on Riemannian Manifolds with Gaussian RBF Kernels · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2015 |
Computer vision › Face, body and person analysis
face recognition |
0.1 | 1 | 2014 | Optimizing over Radial Kernels on Compact Manifolds · CVPR 2014 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
knowledge distillation · 2.7embedding matching · 1.5transformer · 1.1BERT · 1.1maximum mean discrepancy · 0.8markov random field · 0.8differentiable inference layer · 0.8backpropagation · 0.8Gaussian RBF kernel · 0.8CLIP embedding · 0.8support vector machine · 0.3positive definite kernels · 0.3multiple kernel learning · 0.3kernel PCA · 0.3
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | MarkovGen: Structured Prediction for Efficient Text-to-Image GenerationabstractModern text-to-image generation models produce high-quality images that are both photorealistic and faithful to the text prompts. However, this quality comes at significant computational cost: nearly all of these models are iterative and require running sampling multiple times with large models. This iterative process is needed to ensure that different regions of the image are not only aligned with the text prompt, but also compatible with each other. In this work, we propose a light-weight approach to achieving this compatibility between different regions of an image, using a Markov Random Field (MRF) model. We demonstrate the effectiveness of this method on top of the latent token-based Muse text-to-image model. The MRF richly encodes the compatibility among image tokens at different spatial locations to improve quality and significantly reduce the required number of Muse sampling steps. Inference with the MRF is significantly cheaper, and its parameters can be quickly learned through back-propagation by modeling MRF inference as a differentiable neural-network layer. Our full model, MarkovGen, uses this proposed MRF model to both speed up Muse by 1.5 x and produce higher quality images by decreasing undesirable image artifacts. Sadeep Jayasumana, Daniel Glasner, Srikumar Ramalingam, Andreas Veit, Ayan Chakrabarti, Sanjiv Kumar |
CVPR | 1 |
| 2024 | Rethinking FID: Towards a Better Evaluation Metric for Image GenerationabstractAs with many machine learning problems, the progress of image generation methods hinges on good evaluation metrics. One of the most popular is the Frechet Inception Distance (FID). FID estimates the distance between a distribution of Inception-v3 features of real images, and those of images generated by the algorithm. We highlight important drawbacks of FID: Inception's poor representation of the rich and varied content generated by modern text-to-image models, incorrect normality assumptions, and poor sample complexity. We call for a reevaluation of FID's use as the primary quality metric for generated images. We empirically demonstrate that FID contradicts human raters, it does not reflect gradual improvement of iterative text-to-image models, it does not capture distortion levels, and that it produces inconsistent results when varying the sample size. We also propose an alternative new metric, CMMD, based on richer CLIP embeddings and the maximum mean discrepancy distance with the Gaussian RBF kernel. It is an unbiased estimator that does not make any assumptions on the probability distribution of the embeddings and is sample efficient. Through extensive experiments and analysis, we demonstrate that FID-based evaluations of text-to-image models may be unreliable, and that CMMD of-fers a more robust and reliable assessment of image quality. A reference implementation of CMMD is available at: https://github.com/google-research/google-research/tree/master/cmmd. Sadeep Jayasumana, Srikumar Ramalingam, Andreas Veit, Daniel Glasner, Ayan Chakrabarti, Sanjiv Kumar |
CVPR | 1 |
| 2024 | USTAD: Unified Single-model Training Achieving Diverse Scores for Information RetrievalabstractModern information retrieval (IR) systems consists of multiple stages like retrieval and ranking, with Transformer-based models achieving state-of-the-art performance at each stage. In this paper, we challenge the tradition of using separate models for different stages and ask if a single Transformer encoder can provide relevance score needed in each stage. We present USTAD – a new unified approach to train a single network that can provide powerful ranking scores as a cross-encoder (CE) model as well as factorized embeddings for large-scale retrieval as a dual-encoder (DE) model. Empirically, we find a single USTAD model to be competitive to separate ranking CE and retrieval DE models. Furthermore, USTAD combines well with a novel embedding matching-based distillation, significantly improving CE to DE distillation. It further motivates novel asymmetric architectures for student models to ensure a better embedding alignment between the student and the teacher while ensuring small online inference cost. On standard benchmarks like MSMARCO, we demonstrate that USTAD with our proposed distillation method leads to asymmetric students with only 1/10th trainable parameter but retaining 95-97% of the teacher performance. Seungyeon Kim 0001, Ankit Singh Rawat, Manzil Zaheer, Wittawat Jitkrittum, Veeranjaneyulu Sadhanala, Sadeep Jayasumana, Aditya Krishna Menon, Rob Fergus, Sanjiv Kumar |
ICML | 6 |
| 2022 | In defense of dual-encoders for neural rankingabstractTransformer-based models such as BERT have proven successful in information retrieval problem, which seek to identify relevant documents for a given query. There are two broad flavours of such models: cross-attention (CA) models, which learn a joint embedding for the query and document, and dual-encoder (DE) models, which learn separate embeddings for the query and document. Empirically, CA models are often found to be more accurate, which has motivated a series of works seeking to bridge this gap. However, a more fundamental question remains less explored: does this performance gap reflect an inherent limitation in the capacity of DE models, or a limitation in the training of such models? And does such an understanding suggest a principled means of improving DE models? In this paper, we study these questions, with three contributions. First, we establish theoretically that with a sufficiently large embedding dimension, DE models have the capacity to model a broad class of score distributions. Second, we show empirically that on real-world problems, DE models may overfit to spurious correlations in the training set, and thus under-perform on test samples. To mitigate this behaviour, we propose a suitable distillation strategy, and confirm its practical efficacy on the MSMARCO-Passage and Natural Questions benchmarks. Aditya Krishna Menon, Sadeep Jayasumana, Ankit Singh Rawat, Seungyeon Kim 0001, Sashank J. Reddi, Sanjiv Kumar |
ICML | 2 |
| 2021 | Long-tail learning via logit adjustment
Aditya Krishna Menon, Sadeep Jayasumana, Ankit Singh Rawat, Himanshu Jain, Andreas Veit, Sanjiv Kumar |
ICLR | 2 |
| 2021 | Disentangling Sampling and Labeling Bias for Learning in Large-output SpacesabstractNegative sampling schemes enable efficient training given a large number of classes, by offering a means to approximate a computationally expensive loss function that takes all labels into account. In this paper, we present a new connection between these schemes and loss modification techniques for countering label imbalance. We show that different negative sampling schemes implicitly trade-off performance on dominant versus rare labels. Further, we provide a unified means to explicitly tackle both sampling bias, arising from working with a subset of all labels, and labeling bias, which is inherent to the data due to label imbalance. We empirically verify our findings on long-tail classification and retrieval benchmarks. Ankit Singh Rawat, Aditya Krishna Menon, Wittawat Jitkrittum, Sadeep Jayasumana, Felix X. Yu, Sashank J. Reddi, Sanjiv Kumar |
ICML | 4 |
| 2020 | Bipartite Conditional Random Fields for Panoptic Segmentation
Sadeep Jayasumana, Kanchana Ranasinghe, Sahan Liyanaarachchi, Mayuka Jayawardhana, Harsha Ranasinghe, Sina Samangooei |
BMVC | 1 |
| 2016 | Higher Order Conditional Random Fields in Deep Neural Networks
Anurag Arnab, Sadeep Jayasumana, Shuai Zheng 0001, Philip Torr 0001 |
ECCV (2) | 2 |
| 2015 | Prototypical Priors: From Improving Classification to Zero-Shot LearningabstractRecent works on zero-shot learning make use of side information such as visual attributes or natural language semantics to define the relations between output visual classes and then use these relationships to draw inference on new unseen classes at test time. In a novel extension to this idea, we propose the use of visual prototypical concepts as side information. For most real-world visual object categories, it may be difficult to establish a unique prototype. However, in cases such as traffic signs, brand logos, flags, and even natural language characters, these prototypical templates are available and can be leveraged for an improved recognition performance. The present work proposes a way to incorporate this prototypical information in a deep learning framework. Using prototypes as prior information, the deepnet pipeline learns the input image projections into the prototypical embedding space subject to minimization of the final classification loss. Based on our experiments with two different datasets of traffic signs and brand logos, prototypical embeddings incorporated in a conventional convolutional neural network improve the recognition performance. Recognition accuracy on the Belga logo dataset is especially noteworthy and establishes a new state-of-the-art. In zero-shot learning scenarios, the same system can be directly deployed to draw inference on unseen classes by simply adding the prototypical information for these new classes at test time. Thus, unlike earlier approaches, testing on seen and unseen classes is handled using the same pipeline, and the system can be tuned for a trade-off of seen and unseen class performance as per task requirement. Comparison with one of the latest works in the zero-shot learning domain yields top results on the two datasets mentioned above. Saumya Jetley, Bernardino Romera-Paredes, Sadeep Jayasumana, Philip Torr 0001 |
BMVC | 3 |
| 2015 | Conditional Random Fields as Recurrent Neural NetworksabstractPixel-level labelling tasks, such as semantic segmentation, play a central role in image understanding. Recent approaches have attempted to harness the capabilities of deep learning techniques for image recognition to tackle pixel-level labelling tasks. One central issue in this methodology is the limited capacity of deep learning techniques to delineate visual objects. To solve this problem, we introduce a new form of convolutional neural network that combines the strengths of Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) and Conditional Random Fields (CRFs)-based probabilistic graphical modelling. To this end, we formulate Conditional Random Fields with Gaussian pairwise potentials and mean-field approximate inference as Recurrent Neural Networks. This network, called CRF-RNN, is then plugged in as a part of a CNN to obtain a deep network that has desirable properties of both CNNs and CRFs. Importantly, our system fully integrates CRF modelling with CNNs, making it possible to train the whole deep network end-to-end with the usual back-propagation algorithm, avoiding offline post-processing methods for object delineation. We apply the proposed method to the problem of semantic image segmentation, obtaining top results on the challenging Pascal VOC 2012 segmentation benchmark. Shuai Zheng 0001, Sadeep Jayasumana, Bernardino Romera-Paredes, Vibhav Vineet, Zhizhong Su, Dalong Du, Chang Huang, Philip Torr 0001 |
ICCV | 2 |
| 2015 | Kernel Methods on Riemannian Manifolds with Gaussian RBF KernelsabstractIn this paper, we develop an approach to exploiting kernel methods with manifold-valued data. In many computer vision problems, the data can be naturally represented as points on a Riemannian manifold. Due to the non-Euclidean geometry of Riemannian manifolds, usual Euclidean computer vision and machine learning algorithms yield inferior results on such data. In this paper, we define Gaussian radial basis function (RBF)-based positive definite kernels on manifolds that permit us to embed a given manifold with a corresponding metric in a high dimensional reproducing kernel Hilbert space. These kernels make it possible to utilize algorithms developed for linear spaces on nonlinear manifold-valued data. Since the Gaussian RBF defined with any given metric is not always positive definite, we present a unified framework for analyzing the positive definiteness of the Gaussian RBF on a generic metric space. We then use the proposed framework to identify positive definite kernels on two specific manifolds commonly encountered in computer vision: the Riemannian manifold of symmetric positive definite matrices and the Grassmann manifold, i.e., the Riemannian manifold of linear subspaces of a Euclidean space. We show that many popular algorithms designed for Euclidean spaces, such as support vector machines, discriminant analysis and principal component analysis can be generalized to Riemannian manifolds with the help of such positive definite Gaussian kernels. Sadeep Jayasumana, Richard I. Hartley, Mathieu Salzmann, Hongdong Li, Mehrtash Harandi |
IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. | 1 |
| 2014 | Optimizing over Radial Kernels on Compact ManifoldsabstractWe tackle the problem of optimizing over all possible positive definite radial kernels on Riemannian manifolds for classification. Kernel methods on Riemannian manifolds have recently become increasingly popular in computer vision. However, the number of known positive definite kernels on manifolds remain very limited. Furthermore, most kernels typically depend on at least one parameter that needs to be tuned for the problem at hand. A poor choice of kernel, or of parameter value, may yield significant performance drop-off. Here, we show that positive definite radial kernels on the unit n-sphere, the Grassmann manifold and Kendall's shape manifold can be expressed in a simple form whose parameters can be automatically optimized within a support vector machine framework. We demonstrate the benefits of our kernel learning algorithm on object, face, action and shape recognition. Sadeep Jayasumana, Richard I. Hartley, Mathieu Salzmann, Hongdong Li, Mehrtash Harandi |
CVPR | 1 |
| 2014 | Expanding the Family of Grassmannian Kernels: An Embedding Perspective
Mehrtash Harandi, Mathieu Salzmann, Sadeep Jayasumana, Richard I. Hartley, Hongdong Li |
ECCV (7) | 3 |
| 2013 | Kernel Methods on the Riemannian Manifold of Symmetric Positive Definite MatricesabstractSymmetric Positive Definite (SPD) matrices have become popular to encode image information. Accounting for the geometry of the Riemannian manifold of SPD matrices has proven key to the success of many algorithms. However, most existing methods only approximate the true shape of the manifold locally by its tangent plane. In this paper, inspired by kernel methods, we propose to map SPD matrices to a high dimensional Hilbert space where Euclidean geometry applies. To encode the geometry of the manifold in the mapping, we introduce a family of provably positive definite kernels on the Riemannian manifold of SPD matrices. These kernels are derived from the Gaussian kernel, but exploit different metrics on the manifold. This lets us extend kernel-based algorithms developed for Euclidean spaces, such as SVM and kernel PCA, to the Riemannian manifold of SPD matrices. We demonstrate the benefits of our approach on the problems of pedestrian detection, object categorization, texture analysis, 2D motion segmentation and Diffusion Tensor Imaging (DTI) segmentation. Sadeep Jayasumana, Richard I. Hartley, Mathieu Salzmann, Hongdong Li, Mehrtash Harandi |
CVPR | 1 |
| 2013 | A Framework for Shape Analysis via Hilbert Space EmbeddingabstractWe propose a framework for 2D shape analysis using positive definite kernels defined on Kendall's shape manifold. Different representations of 2D shapes are known to generate different nonlinear spaces. Due to the nonlinearity of these spaces, most existing shape classification algorithms resort to nearest neighbor methods and to learning distances on shape spaces. Here, we propose to map shapes on Kendall's shape manifold to a high dimensional Hilbert space where Euclidean geometry applies. To this end, we introduce a kernel on this manifold that permits such a mapping, and prove its positive definiteness. This kernel lets us extend kernel-based algorithms developed for Euclidean spaces, such as SVM, MKL and kernel PCA, to the shape manifold. We demonstrate the benefits of our approach over the state-of-the-art methods on shape classification, clustering and retrieval. Sadeep Jayasumana, Mathieu Salzmann, Hongdong Li, Mehrtash Harandi |
ICCV | 1 |
| 2013 | Improved Server Architecture for Highly Efficient Message MediationabstractEnterprise Service Bus facilitates message-based communication between modular software components in a SOA application. In addition to message routing, the ESB communication abstraction includes filtering and transformation capabilities that enable composing separate software modules quickly, with minimal code changes. For this reason, this richer communication capability is often termed "mediation". Hiranya Jayathilaka, Pradeep R. Fernando, Paul Fremantle, Kasun Indrasiri, Dushan Abeyruwan, Supun Kamburugamuve, Sadeep Jayasumana, Sanjiva Weerawarana, Srinath Perera |
iiWAS | 7 |