Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Laurent Sifre

dblp:135/4934 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
9ranked-venue papers
2as first author
6since 2021 · last 2022
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 9 · 2 first-author · 6 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
8 papers
Reinforcement learning · 25% Deep learning architectures and training · 22% Language models and text generation · 20%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
2 papers
Information retrieval · 100%
Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper
Image and video processing · 100%

Topics — the 19 heaviest of 21, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
scaling laws
1.122022
An empirical analysis of compute-optimal large language model training · NeurIPS 2022
Unified Scaling Laws for Routed Language Models · ICML 2022
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › efficient training
compute-optimal training
0.612022
An empirical analysis of compute-optimal large language model training · NeurIPS 2022
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems
knowledge-intensive tasks
0.612022
Improving Language Models by Retrieving from Trillions of Tokens · ICML 2022
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
mixture of experts
0.612022
Unified Scaling Laws for Routed Language Models · ICML 2022
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
offline reinforcement learning
0.612022
Large-Scale Retrieval for Reinforcement Learning · NeurIPS 2022
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
retrieval-augmented language models
0.612022
Improving Language Models by Retrieving from Trillions of Tokens · ICML 2022
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › partially observable reinforcement learning › memory-based reinforcement learning
retrieval-augmented reinforcement learning
0.612022
Large-Scale Retrieval for Reinforcement Learning · NeurIPS 2022
Information retrieval
document retrieval
0.612022
Improving Language Models by Retrieving from Trillions of Tokens · ICML 2022
Information retrieval
similarity search
0.612022
Large-Scale Retrieval for Reinforcement Learning · NeurIPS 2022
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › decoding › decoding strategy
beam search
0.512021
Machine Translation Decoding beyond Beam Search · EMNLP (1) 2021
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
decoding
0.512021
Machine Translation Decoding beyond Beam Search · EMNLP (1) 2021
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
policy optimization
0.512021
Muesli: Combining Improvements in Policy Optimization · ICML 2021
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping
learning-based navigation
0.312017
Learning to Navigate in Complex Environments · ICLR (Poster) 2017
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › reinforcement learning for control
navigation policy learning
0.312017
Learning to Navigate in Complex Environments · ICLR (Poster) 2017
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction
game playing
0.212022
Large-Scale Retrieval for Reinforcement Learning · NeurIPS 2022
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
image classification
0.212013
Rotation, Scaling and Deformation Invariant Scattering for Texture Discrimination · CVPR 2013
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
invariant representation
0.212013
Rotation, Scaling and Deformation Invariant Scattering for Texture Discrimination · CVPR 2013
Image and video processing
texture analysis
0.212013
Rotation, Scaling and Deformation Invariant Scattering for Texture Discrimination · CVPR 2013
Image and video processing › texture analysis
texture classification
0.212013
Rotation, Scaling and Deformation Invariant Scattering for Texture Discrimination · CVPR 2013

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

end-to-end learning · 1.1differentiable encoder · 1.1chunked cross-attention · 1.1attention · 1.1approximate nearest neighbor · 1.1scaling law estimation · 0.6power-law scaling · 0.6effective parameter count · 0.6reinforcement learning · 0.5beam search · 0.5wavelet transform · 0.2scattering transform · 0.2deep convolution network · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2022 Improving Language Models by Retrieving from Trillions of Tokens
abstract
We enhance auto-regressive language models by conditioning on document chunks retrieved from a large corpus, based on local similarity with preceding tokens. With a 2 trillion token database, our Retrieval-Enhanced Transformer (RETRO) obtains comparable performance to GPT-3 and Jurassic-1 on the Pile, despite using 25{\texttimes} fewer parameters. After fine-tuning, RETRO performance translates to downstream knowledge-intensive tasks such as question answering. RETRO combines a frozen Bert retriever, a differentiable encoder and a chunked cross-attention mechanism to predict tokens based on an order of magnitude more data than what is typically consumed during training. We typically train RETRO from scratch, yet can also rapidly RETROfit pre-trained transformers with retrieval and still achieve good performance. Our work opens up new avenues for improving language models through explicit memory at unprecedented scale.
Sebastian Borgeaud, Arthur Mensch, Jordan Hoffmann, Trevor Cai, Eliza Rutherford, Katie Millican, George van den Driessche 0002, Jean-Baptiste Lespiau, Bogdan Damoc, Aidan Clark, Diego de Las Casas, Aurelia Guy, Jacob Menick, Roman Ring, Tom Hennigan, Saffron Huang, Loren Maggiore, Albin Cassirer, Andrew Brock, Michela Paganini, Geoffrey Irving, Oriol Vinyals, Simon Osindero, Karen Simonyan, Jack W. Rae, Erich Elsen, Laurent Sifre
ICML28
2022 Unified Scaling Laws for Routed Language Models
abstract
The performance of a language model has been shown to be effectively modeled as a power-law in its parameter count. Here we study the scaling behaviors of Routing Networks: architectures that conditionally use only a subset of their parameters while processing an input. For these models, parameter count and computational requirement form two independent axes along which an increase leads to better performance. In this work we derive and justify scaling laws defined on these two variables which generalize those known for standard language models and describe the performance of a wide range of routing architectures trained via three different techniques. Afterwards we provide two applications of these laws: first deriving an Effective Parameter Count along which all models scale at the same rate, and then using the scaling coefficients to give a quantitative comparison of the three routing techniques considered. Our analysis derives from an extensive evaluation of Routing Networks across five orders of magnitude of size, including models with hundreds of experts and hundreds of billions of parameters.
Aidan Clark, Diego de Las Casas, Aurelia Guy, Arthur Mensch, Michela Paganini, Jordan Hoffmann, Bogdan Damoc, Blake A. Hechtman, Trevor Cai, Sebastian Borgeaud, George van den Driessche 0002, Eliza Rutherford, Tom Hennigan, Matthew J. Johnson 0002, Albin Cassirer, Elena Buchatskaya, David Budden, Laurent Sifre, Simon Osindero, Oriol Vinyals, Marc'Aurelio Ranzato, Jack W. Rae, Erich Elsen, Koray Kavukcuoglu, Karen Simonyan
ICML19
2022 An empirical analysis of compute-optimal large language model training
abstract
We investigate the optimal model size and number of tokens for training a transformer language model under a given compute budget. We find that current large language models are significantly undertrained, a consequence of the recent focus on scaling language models whilst keeping the amount of training data constant. By training over 400 language models ranging from 70 million to over 16 billion parameters on 5 to 500 billion tokens, we find that for compute-optimal training, the model size and the number of training tokens should be scaled equally: for every doubling of model size the number of training tokens should also be doubled. We test this hypothesis by training a predicted compute-optimal model, Chinchilla, that uses the same compute budget as Gopher but with 70B parameters and 4$\times$ more data. Chinchilla uniformly and significantly outperformsGopher (280B), GPT-3 (175B), Jurassic-1 (178B), and Megatron-Turing NLG (530B) on a large range of downstream evaluation tasks. This also means that Chinchilla uses substantially less compute for fine-tuning and inference, greatly facilitating downstream usage. As a highlight, Chinchilla reaches a state-of-the-art average accuracy of 67.5% on the MMLU benchmark, a 7% improvement over Gopher.
Jordan Hoffmann, Sebastian Borgeaud, Arthur Mensch, Elena Buchatskaya, Trevor Cai, Eliza Rutherford, Diego de Las Casas, Lisa Anne Hendricks, Johannes Welbl, Aidan Clark, Tom Hennigan, Eric Noland, Katherine Millican, George van den Driessche 0002, Bogdan Damoc, Aurelia Guy, Simon Osindero, Karen Simonyan, Erich Elsen, Oriol Vinyals, Jack W. Rae, Laurent Sifre
NeurIPS22
2022 Large-Scale Retrieval for Reinforcement Learning
abstract
Effective decision making involves flexibly relating past experiences and relevant contextual information to a novel situation. In deep reinforcement learning (RL), the dominant paradigm is for an agent to amortise information that helps decision-making into its network weights via gradient descent on training losses. Here, we pursue an alternative approach in which agents can utilise large-scale context-sensitive database lookups to support their parametric computations. This allows agents to directly learn in an end-to-end manner to utilise relevant information to inform their outputs. In addition, new information can be attended to by the agent, without retraining, by simply augmenting the retrieval dataset. We study this approach for offline RL in 9x9 Go, a challenging game for which the vast combinatorial state space privileges generalisation over direct matching to past experiences. We leverage fast, approximate nearest neighbor techniques in order to retrieve relevant data from a set of tens of millions of expert demonstration states. Attending to this information provides a significant boost to prediction accuracy and game-play performance over simply using these demonstrations as training trajectories, providing a compelling demonstration of the value of large-scale retrieval in offline RL agents.
Peter Conway Humphreys, Arthur Guez, Olivier Tieleman, Laurent Sifre, Theophane Weber, Timothy P. Lillicrap
NeurIPS4
2021 Machine Translation Decoding beyond Beam Search
abstract
Rémi Leblond, Jean-Baptiste Alayrac, Laurent Sifre, Miruna Pislar, Lespiau Jean-Baptiste, Ioannis Antonoglou, Karen Simonyan, Oriol Vinyals. Proceedings of the 2021 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. 2021.
Rémi Leblond, Jean-Baptiste Alayrac, Laurent Sifre, Miruna Pislar, Jean-Baptiste Lespiau, Ioannis Antonoglou, Karen Simonyan, Oriol Vinyals
EMNLP (1)3
2021 Muesli: Combining Improvements in Policy Optimization
abstract
We propose a novel policy update that combines regularized policy optimization with model learning as an auxiliary loss. The update (henceforth Muesli) matches MuZero’s state-of-the-art performance on Atari. Notably, Muesli does so without using deep search: it acts directly with a policy network and has computation speed comparable to model-free baselines. The Atari results are complemented by extensive ablations, and by additional results on continuous control and 9x9 Go.
Matteo Hessel, Ivo Danihelka, Fabio Viola, Arthur Guez, Simon Schmitt, Laurent Sifre, Theophane Weber, David Silver 0001, Hado van Hasselt
ICML6
2017 Learning to Navigate in Complex Environments
Piotr Mirowski, Razvan Pascanu, Fabio Viola, Hubert Soyer, Andrew J. Ballard, Andrea Banino, Misha Denil, Ross Goroshin, Laurent Sifre, Koray Kavukcuoglu, Dharshan Kumaran, Raia Hadsell
ICLR (Poster)9
2013 Rotation, Scaling and Deformation Invariant Scattering for Texture Discrimination
abstract
An affine invariant representation is constructed with a cascade of invariants, which preserves information for classification. A joint translation and rotation invariant representation of image patches is calculated with a scattering transform. It is implemented with a deep convolution network, which computes successive wavelet transforms and modulus non-linearities. Invariants to scaling, shearing and small deformations are calculated with linear operators in the scattering domain. State-of-the-art classification results are obtained over texture databases with uncontrolled viewing conditions.
Laurent Sifre, Stéphane Mallat
CVPR1
2012 Combined scattering for rotation invariant texture analysis
Laurent Sifre, Stéphane Mallat
ESANN1