Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Konsta Duesing
dblp:135/5797
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2016
0000-0003-3103-0600ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 3
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Bioinformatics and computational biology › sequence analysis
sequencing error correction |
0.2 | 1 | 2014 | Blue: correcting sequencing errors using consensus and context · Bioinform. 2014 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › sequence analysis › sequencing data processing
sequencing quality control |
0.2 | 1 | 2014 | Blue: correcting sequencing errors using consensus and context · Bioinform. 2014 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
k-mer consensus · 0.2context-based correction · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 | Risk-conscious correction of batch effects: maximising information extraction from high-throughput genomic datasetsabstractBACKGROUND: Batch effects are a persistent and pervasive form of measurement noise which undermine the scientific utility of high-throughput genomic datasets. At their most benign, they reduce the power of statistical tests resulting in actual effects going unidentified. At their worst, they constitute confounds and render datasets useless. Attempting to remove batch effects will result in some of the biologically meaningful component of the measurement (i.e. signal) being lost. We present and benchmark a novel technique, called Harman. Harman maximises the removal of batch noise with the constraint that the risk of also losing biologically meaningful component of the measurement is kept to a fraction which is set by the user. RESULTS: Analyses of three independent publically available datasets reveal that Harman removes more batch noise and preserves more signal at the same time, than the current leading technique. Results also show that Harman is able to identify and remove batch effects no matter what their relative size compared to other sources of variation in the dataset. Of particular advantage for meta-analyses and data integration is Harman's superior consistency in achieving comparable noise suppression - signal preservation trade-offs across multiple datasets, with differing number of treatments, replicates and processing batches. CONCLUSION: Harman's ability to better remove batch noise, and better preserve biologically meaningful signal simultaneously within a single study, and maintain the user-set trade-off between batch noise rejection and signal preservation across different studies makes it an effective alternative method to deal with batch effects in high-throughput genomic datasets. Harman is flexible in terms of the data types it can process. It is available publically as an R package ( https://bioconductor.org/packages/release/bioc/html/Harman.html ), as well as a compiled Matlab package ( http://www.bioinformatics.csiro.au/harman/ ) which does not require a Matlab license to run. Yalchin Oytam, Fariborz Sobhanmanesh, Konsta Duesing, Josh Bowden, Megan Osmond-McLeod, Jason Ross |
BMC Bioinform. | 3 |
| 2014 | Blue: correcting sequencing errors using consensus and contextabstractMOTIVATION: Bioinformatics tools, such as assemblers and aligners, are expected to produce more accurate results when given better quality sequence data as their starting point. This expectation has led to the development of stand-alone tools whose sole purpose is to detect and remove sequencing errors. A good error-correcting tool would be a transparent component in a bioinformatics pipeline, simply taking sequence data in any of the standard formats and producing a higher quality version of the same data containing far fewer errors. It should not only be able to correct all of the types of errors found in real sequence data (substitutions, insertions, deletions and uncalled bases), but it has to be both fast enough and scalable enough to be usable on the large datasets being produced by current sequencing technologies, and work on data derived from both haploid and diploid organisms. RESULTS: This article presents Blue, an error-correction algorithm based on k-mer consensus and context. Blue can correct substitution, deletion and insertion errors, as well as uncalled bases. It accepts both FASTQ and FASTA formats, and corrects quality scores for corrected bases. Blue also maintains the pairing of reads, both within a file and between pairs of files, making it compatible with downstream tools that depend on read pairing. Blue is memory efficient, scalable and faster than other published tools, and usable on large sequencing datasets. On the tests undertaken, Blue also proved to be generally more accurate than other published algorithms, resulting in more accurately aligned reads and the assembly of longer contigs containing fewer errors. One significant feature of Blue is that its k-mer consensus table does not have to be derived from the set of reads being corrected. This decoupling makes it possible to correct one dataset, such as small set of 454 mate-pair reads, with the consensus derived from another dataset, such as Illumina reads derived from the same DNA sample. Such cross-correction can greatly improve the quality of small (and expensive) sets of long reads, leading to even better assemblies and higher quality finished genomes. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The code for Blue and its related tools are available from http://www.bioinformatics.csiro.au/Blue. These programs are written in C# and run natively under Windows and under Mono on Linux. Paul Greenfield, Konsta Duesing, Alexie Papanicolaou, Denis C. Bauer |
Bioinform. | 2 |
| 2013 | Next-generation sequencing: a challenge to meet the increasing demand for training workshops in AustraliaabstractThe widespread adoption of high-throughput next-generation sequencing (NGS) technology among the Australian life science research community is highlighting an urgent need to up-skill biologists in tools required for handling and analysing their NGS data. There is currently a shortage of cutting-edge bioinformatics training courses in Australia as a consequence of a scarcity of skilled trainers with time and funding to develop and deliver training courses. To address this, a consortium of Australian research organizations, including Bioplatforms Australia, the Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation and the Australian Bioinformatics Network, have been collaborating with EMBL-EBI training team. A group of Australian bioinformaticians attended the train-the-trainer workshop to improve training skills in developing and delivering bioinformatics workshop curriculum. A 2-day NGS workshop was jointly developed to provide hands-on knowledge and understanding of typical NGS data analysis workflows. The road show-style workshop was successfully delivered at five geographically distant venues in Australia using the newly established Australian NeCTAR Research Cloud. We highlight the challenges we had to overcome at different stages from design to delivery, including the establishment of an Australian bioinformatics training network and the computing infrastructure and resource development. A virtual machine image, workshop materials and scripts for configuring a machine with workshop contents have all been made available under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. This means participants continue to have convenient access to an environment they had become familiar and bioinformatics trainers are able to access and reuse these resources. Nathan S. Watson-Haigh, Catherine A. Shang, Matthias Haimel, Myrto Kostadima, Remco Loos, Nandan Deshpande, Konsta Duesing, Annette McGrath, Sean McWilliam, Simon Michnowicz, Paula Moolhuijzen, Steve Quenette, Jerico Revote, Sonika Tyagi, Maria Victoria Schneider |
Briefings Bioinform. | 7 |