EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Thanumalayan Sankaranarayana Pillai
dblp:135/6845
· DBLP profile ↗
10ranked-venue papers
4as first author
1since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Systems, architecture and hardware · 5 · 3 first-authorSoftware engineering, systems software and programming languages · 4 · 1 first-authorDatabases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2 · 1 first-authorArtificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
8 papers |
Storage systems · 100% | |
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Language models and text generation · 51% Deep learning architectures and training · 17% Transfer learning and domain adaptation · 17% |
Topics — the 21 heaviest of 24, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Storage systems
crash consistency |
1.5 | 6 | 2017 | Application Crash Consistency and Performance with CCFS · ACM Trans. Storage 2017 Application Crash Consistency and Performance with CCFS · USENIX ATC 2017 Application Crash Consistency and Performance with CCFS · FAST 2017 |
Storage systems
file systems |
1.2 | 5 | 2017 | Application Crash Consistency and Performance with CCFS · ACM Trans. Storage 2017 Application Crash Consistency and Performance with CCFS · USENIX ATC 2017 Application Crash Consistency and Performance with CCFS · FAST 2017 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
chain-of-thought reasoning |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | PaLM: Scaling Language Modeling with Pathways · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2023 |
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
few-shot learning |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | PaLM: Scaling Language Modeling with Pathways · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2023 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
instruction following |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | PaLM: Scaling Language Modeling with Pathways · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2023 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
large language model |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | PaLM: Scaling Language Modeling with Pathways · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2023 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
scaling laws |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | PaLM: Scaling Language Modeling with Pathways · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2023 |
Storage systems
storage reliability |
0.6 | 3 | 2017 | Application Crash Consistency and Performance with CCFS · ACM Trans. Storage 2017 Correlated Crash Vulnerabilities · OSDI 2016 Application Crash Consistency and Performance with CCFS · USENIX ATC 2017 |
Storage systems
key-value storage |
0.5 | 2 | 2017 | WiscKey: Separating Keys from Values in SSD-Conscious Storage · ACM Trans. Storage 2017 WiscKey: Separating Keys from Values in SSD-conscious Storage · FAST 2016 |
Storage systems › crash consistency
application crash consistency |
0.4 | 2 | 2017 | Application Crash Consistency and Performance with CCFS · ACM Trans. Storage 2017 Application Crash Consistency and Performance with CCFS · USENIX ATC 2017 |
Storage systems
flash and SSD |
0.4 | 2 | 2017 | WiscKey: Separating Keys from Values in SSD-Conscious Storage · ACM Trans. Storage 2017 WiscKey: Separating Keys from Values in SSD-conscious Storage · FAST 2016 |
Storage systems › storage performance
i/o amplification |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | WiscKey: Separating Keys from Values in SSD-Conscious Storage · ACM Trans. Storage 2017 |
Storage systems › key-value storage
LSM-tree |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | WiscKey: Separating Keys from Values in SSD-Conscious Storage · ACM Trans. Storage 2017 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
distributed training |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | PaLM: Scaling Language Modeling with Pathways · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2023 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › distributed training
model parallelism |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | PaLM: Scaling Language Modeling with Pathways · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2023 |
Storage systems › file systems
journaling file system |
0.2 | 1 | 2013 | Optimistic crash consistency · SOSP 2013 |
Operating systems › resource management › storage management › file systems
file system interface |
0.1 | 1 | 2017 | Application Crash Consistency and Performance with CCFS · ACM Trans. Storage 2017 |
Storage systems › key-value storage
persistent key-value store |
0.1 | 1 | 2017 | WiscKey: Separating Keys from Values in SSD-Conscious Storage · ACM Trans. Storage 2017 |
Operating systems › resource management › storage management
file systems |
0.1 | 1 | 2016 | Correlated Crash Vulnerabilities · OSDI 2016 |
Storage systems › flash and SSD
solid-state drive |
0.1 | 1 | 2016 | WiscKey: Separating Keys from Values in SSD-conscious Storage · FAST 2016 |
Operating systems › resource management › storage management › file systems
file system reliability |
0.1 | 1 | 2014 | All File Systems Are Not Created Equal: On the Complexity of Crafting Crash-Consistent Applications · OSDI 2014 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
transformer · 0.7pathways · 0.7stream abstraction · 0.6program-order commit · 0.6optimistic commit protocol · 0.3key-value separation · 0.3consistency checking · 0.3LSM-tree · 0.3
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | PaLM: Scaling Language Modeling with PathwaysabstractLarge language models have been shown to achieve remarkable performance across a variety of natural language tasks using few-shot learning, which drastically reduces the number of task-specific training examples needed to adapt the model to a particular application. To further our understanding of the impact of scale on few-shot learning, we trained a 540-billion parameter, densely activated, Transformer language model, which we call Pathways Language Model (PaLM). We trained PaLM on 6144 TPU v4 chips using Pathways, a new ML system which enables highly efficient training across multiple TPU Pods. We demonstrate continued benefits of scaling by achieving state-of-the-art few-shot learning results on hundreds of language understanding and generation benchmarks. On a number of these tasks, PaLM 540B achieves breakthrough performance, outperforming the finetuned state-of-the-art on a suite of multi-step reasoning tasks, and outperforming average human performance on the recently released BIG-bench benchmark. A significant number of BIG-bench tasks showed discontinuous improvements from model scale, meaning that performance steeply increased as we scaled to our largest model. PaLM also has strong capabilities in multilingual tasks and source code generation, which we demonstrate on a wide array of benchmarks. We additionally provide a comprehensive analysis on bias and toxicity, and study the extent of training data memorization with respect to model scale. Finally, we discuss the ethical considerations related to large language models and discuss potential mitigation strategies. Aakanksha Chowdhery, Sharan Narang, Jacob Devlin, Maarten Bosma, Adam Roberts, Paul Barham 0001, Hyung Won Chung, Charles Sutton, Sebastian Gehrmann, Parker Schuh, Kensen Shi, Sasha Tsvyashchenko, Joshua Maynez, Abhishek Rao, Parker Barnes, Yi Tay, Noam Shazeer, Vinodkumar Prabhakaran, Emily Reif, Nan Du 0002, Ben Hutchinson, Reiner Pope, Jacob Austin, Michael Isard, Guy Gur-Ari, Toju Duke, Anselm Levskaya, Sanjay Ghemawat, Sunipa Dev, Henryk Michalewski, Xavier Garcia, Vedant Misra, Kevin Robinson, William Fedus, Denny Zhou, Daphne Ippolito, David Luan, Hyeontaek Lim, Barret Zoph, Alexander Spiridonov, Ryan Sepassi, David Dohan, Shivani Agrawal, Mark Omernick, Andrew M. Dai, Thanumalayan Sankaranarayana Pillai, Marie Pellat, Aitor Lewkowycz, Erica Moreira, Rewon Child, Oleksandr Polozov, Katherine Lee, Zongwei Zhou, Xuezhi Wang 0002, Brennan Saeta, Mark Diaz, Orhan Firat, Michele Catasta, Jason Wei, Kathy Meier-Hellstern, Douglas Eck, Jeffrey Dean, Slav Petrov, Noah Fiedel |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 49 |
| 2017 | Application Crash Consistency and Performance with CCFS
Thanumalayan Sankaranarayana Pillai, Ramnatthan Alagappan, Lanyue Lu, Vijay Chidambaram, Andrea C. Arpaci-Dusseau, Remzi H. Arpaci-Dusseau |
FAST | 1 |
| 2017 | Application Crash Consistency and Performance with CCFS
Thanumalayan Sankaranarayana Pillai, Ramnatthan Alagappan, Lanyue Lu, Vijay Chidambaram, Andrea C. Arpaci-Dusseau, Remzi H. Arpaci-Dusseau |
USENIX ATC | 1 |
| 2017 | WiscKey: Separating Keys from Values in SSD-Conscious StorageabstractWe present WiscKey, a persistent LSM-tree-based key-value store with a performance-oriented data layout that separates keys from values to minimize I/O amplification. The design of WiscKey is highly SSD optimized, leveraging both the sequential and random performance characteristics of the device. We demonstrate the advantages of WiscKey with both microbenchmarks and YCSB workloads. Microbenchmark results show that WiscKey is 2.5 × to 111 × faster than LevelDB for loading a database (with significantly better tail latencies) and 1.6 × to 14 × faster for random lookups. WiscKey is faster than both LevelDB and RocksDB in all six YCSB workloads. Lanyue Lu, Thanumalayan Sankaranarayana Pillai, Hariharan Gopalakrishnan, Andrea C. Arpaci-Dusseau, Remzi H. Arpaci-Dusseau |
ACM Trans. Storage | 2 |
| 2017 | Application Crash Consistency and Performance with CCFSabstractRecent research has shown that applications often incorrectly implement crash consistency. We present the Crash-Consistent File System (ccfs), a file system that improves the correctness of application-level crash consistency protocols while maintaining high performance. A key idea in ccfs is the abstraction of a stream . Within a stream, updates are committed in program order, improving correctness; across streams, there are no ordering restrictions, enabling scheduling flexibility and high performance. We empirically demonstrate that applications running atop ccfs achieve high levels of crash consistency. Further, we show that ccfs performance under standard file-system benchmarks is excellent, in the worst case on par with the highest performing modes of Linux ext4, and in some cases notably better. Overall, we demonstrate that both application correctness and high performance can be realized in a modern file system. Thanumalayan Sankaranarayana Pillai, Ramnatthan Alagappan, Lanyue Lu, Vijay Chidambaram, Andrea C. Arpaci-Dusseau, Remzi H. Arpaci-Dusseau |
ACM Trans. Storage | 1 |
| 2016 | WiscKey: Separating Keys from Values in SSD-conscious Storage
Lanyue Lu, Thanumalayan Sankaranarayana Pillai, Andrea C. Arpaci-Dusseau, Remzi H. Arpaci-Dusseau |
FAST | 2 |
| 2016 | Correlated Crash Vulnerabilities
Ramnatthan Alagappan, Aishwarya Ganesan, Yuvraj Patel, Thanumalayan Sankaranarayana Pillai, Andrea C. Arpaci-Dusseau, Remzi H. Arpaci-Dusseau |
OSDI | 4 |
| 2015 | Beyond Storage APIs: Provable Semantics for Storage Stacks
Ramnatthan Alagappan, Vijay Chidambaram, Thanumalayan Sankaranarayana Pillai, Andrea C. Arpaci-Dusseau, Remzi H. Arpaci-Dusseau |
HotOS | 3 |
| 2014 | All File Systems Are Not Created Equal: On the Complexity of Crafting Crash-Consistent Applications
Thanumalayan Sankaranarayana Pillai, Vijay Chidambaram, Ramnatthan Alagappan, Samer Al-Kiswany, Andrea C. Arpaci-Dusseau, Remzi H. Arpaci-Dusseau |
OSDI | 1 |
| 2013 | Optimistic crash consistencyabstractWe introduce optimistic crash consistency, a new approach to crash consistency in journaling file systems. Using an array of novel techniques, we demonstrate how to build an optimistic commit protocol that correctly recovers from crashes and delivers high performance. We implement this optimistic approach within a Linux ext4 variant which we call OptFS. We introduce two new file-system primitives, osync() and dsync(), that decouple ordering of writes from their durability. We show through experiments that OptFS improves performance for many workloads, sometimes by an order of magnitude; we confirm its correctness through a series of robustness tests, showing it recovers to a consistent state after crashes. Finally, we show that osync() and dsync() are useful in atomic file system and database update scenarios, both improving performance and meeting application-level consistency demands. Vijay Chidambaram, Thanumalayan Sankaranarayana Pillai, Andrea C. Arpaci-Dusseau, Remzi H. Arpaci-Dusseau |
SOSP | 2 |