Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Abhijeet Tallavajhula
dblp:135/8384
· DBLP profile ↗
5ranked-venue papers
4as first author
0since 2021 · last 2018
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 4 first-authorSystems, architecture and hardware · 5 · 4 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
4 papers |
Robot manipulation · 32% Motion planning and robot control · 29% Autonomous driving · 19% | |
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Performance modeling and evaluation · 100% |
Topics — the 8 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Robotics › Robot manipulation › robot simulation
sensor simulation |
0.5 | 2 | 2018 | Off-Road Lidar Simulation with Data-Driven Terrain Primitives · ICRA 2018 Construction and validation of a high fidelity simulator for a planar range sensor · ICRA 2015 |
Robotics › Autonomous driving › simulation
LiDAR simulation |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Off-Road Lidar Simulation with Data-Driven Terrain Primitives · ICRA 2018 |
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › motion planning
learning-based motion planning |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | List prediction applied to motion planning · ICRA 2016 |
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
motion planning |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | List prediction applied to motion planning · ICRA 2016 |
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping
object search |
0.2 | 1 | 2013 | Object search by manipulation · ICRA 2013 |
Computer vision › 3D vision
3d scene understanding |
0.1 | 1 | 2018 | Off-Road Lidar Simulation with Data-Driven Terrain Primitives · ICRA 2018 |
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping › terrain modeling
terrain representation |
0.1 | 1 | 2018 | Off-Road Lidar Simulation with Data-Driven Terrain Primitives · ICRA 2018 |
Performance modeling and evaluation
simulation |
0.1 | 1 | 2015 | Construction and validation of a high fidelity simulator for a planar range sensor · ICRA 2015 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
data-driven modeling · 0.4semantic terrain primitives · 0.3hybrid geometric terrain representation · 0.3list prediction · 0.2conseqopt · 0.2visibility and accessibility relations · 0.2greedy algorithm · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 | Off-Road Lidar Simulation with Data-Driven Terrain PrimitivesabstractDeveloping software for large scale off-road robot applications is challenging and tedious due to cost, logistics, and rigor of field testing. High-fidelity sensor-realistic simulation can speed up the development process for perception and state estimation algorithms. We focus on Lidar simulation for robots operating in off-road environments. Lidars are integral sensors for robots, and Lidar simulation for off-road environments is particularly challenging due to the way Lidar rays interact with natural terrain such as vegetation. A hybrid geometric terrain representation has been shown to model Lidar observations well [1]. However, previous work has only been able to simulate a single, fixed scene, and the entire scene had to be precisely surveyed. In this work, we add semantic information to the hybrid geometric model. This allows us to extract terrain primitives, such as trees and shrubs, from data logs. Our approach uses these primitives to compose arbitrary scenes for Lidar simulation. We evaluate our simulator on a real-world environment of interest, and show that primitives derived using our approach generalize to new scenes. Abhijeet Tallavajhula, Çetin Meriçli, Alonzo Kelly |
ICRA | 1 |
| 2016 | List prediction applied to motion planningabstractThere is growing interest in applying machine learning to motion planning. Potential applications are predicting an initial seed for trajectory optimization, predicting an effective heuristic for search based planning, and even predicting a planning algorithm for adaptive motion planning systems. In these situations, providing only a single prediction is unsatisfactory. It leads to many scenarios where the prediction suffers a high loss. In this paper, we advocate list prediction. Each predictor in a list focusses on different regions in the space of environments. This overcomes the shortcoming of a single predictor, and improves overall performance. A framework for list prediction, ConseqOpt, already exists. Our contribution is an extensive domain-specific treatment. We provide a rigorous and clear exposition of the procedure for training a list of predictors. We provide experimental results on a spectrum of motion planning applications. Each application contributes to understanding the behavior of list prediction. We observe that the benefit of list prediction over a single prediction is significant, irrespective of the application. Abhijeet Tallavajhula, Sanjiban Choudhury, Sebastian A. Scherer, Alonzo Kelly |
ICRA | 1 |
| 2016 | Nonparametric distribution regression applied to sensor modelingabstractSensor models, which specify the distribution of sensor observations, are a widely used and integral part of robotics algorithms. Observation distributions are commonly approximated by parametric models, which are limited in their expressiveness, and may require careful design to suit an application. In this paper, we propose nonparametric distribution regression as a procedure to model sensors. It is a data-driven procedure to predict distributions that makes few assumptions. We apply the procedure to model raw distributions from real sensors, and also demonstrate its utility to a mobile robot state estimation task. We show that nonparametric distribution regression adapts to characteristics in the training data, leading to realistic predictions. The same procedure competes favorably with baseline parametric models across applications. The results also help develop intuition for different sensor modeling situations. Our procedure is useful when distributions are inherently noisy, and sufficient data is available. Abhijeet Tallavajhula, Barnabás Póczos, Alonzo Kelly |
IROS | 1 |
| 2015 | Construction and validation of a high fidelity simulator for a planar range sensorabstractWe study the problem of building a sensor model for the purpose of simulation. Our work is motivated by the potential impact of realistic simulators on the development cycle of software for real robots. The case is made for building models from approximate state information, relieving the burden of ground truth. Unlike calibration, where the goal is to identify and remove error from a signal, our aim to reproduce the signal in its entirety, including its error properties. Instead of physically modeling sensor behavior, a data-driven approach is taken. The implementation of our approach to simulate a simple but noisy laser rangefinder is described. Finally, approaches to validate the simulator are discussed. We compare not only raw sensor predictions, but also overall performance of algorithms on simulated versus real data. Abhijeet Tallavajhula, Alonzo Kelly |
ICRA | 1 |
| 2013 | Object search by manipulationabstractWe investigate the problem of a robot searching for an object. This requires reasoning about both perception and manipulation: certain objects are moved because the target may be hidden behind them and others are moved because they block the manipulator's access to other objects. We contribute a formulation of the object search by manipulation problem using visibility and accessibility relations between objects. We also propose a greedy algorithm and show that it is optimal under certain conditions. We propose a second algorithm which is optimal under all conditions. This algorithm takes advantage of the structure of the visibility and accessibility relations between objects to quickly generate optimal plans. Finally, we demonstrate an implementation of both algorithms on a real robot using a real object detection system. Mehmet Remzi Dogar, Michael C. Koval, Abhijeet Tallavajhula, Siddhartha S. Srinivasa |
ICRA | 3 |