Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Abhijeet Tallavajhula

dblp:135/8384 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
5ranked-venue papers
4as first author
0since 2021 · last 2018
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 4 first-authorSystems, architecture and hardware · 5 · 4 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
4 papers
Robot manipulation · 32% Motion planning and robot control · 29% Autonomous driving · 19%
Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Performance modeling and evaluation · 100%

Topics — the 8 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Robotics › Robot manipulation › robot simulation
sensor simulation
0.522018
Off-Road Lidar Simulation with Data-Driven Terrain Primitives · ICRA 2018
Construction and validation of a high fidelity simulator for a planar range sensor · ICRA 2015
Robotics › Autonomous driving › simulation
LiDAR simulation
0.312018
Off-Road Lidar Simulation with Data-Driven Terrain Primitives · ICRA 2018
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › motion planning
learning-based motion planning
0.212016
List prediction applied to motion planning · ICRA 2016
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
motion planning
0.212016
List prediction applied to motion planning · ICRA 2016
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping
object search
0.212013
Object search by manipulation · ICRA 2013
Computer vision › 3D vision
3d scene understanding
0.112018
Off-Road Lidar Simulation with Data-Driven Terrain Primitives · ICRA 2018
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping › terrain modeling
terrain representation
0.112018
Off-Road Lidar Simulation with Data-Driven Terrain Primitives · ICRA 2018
Performance modeling and evaluation
simulation
0.112015
Construction and validation of a high fidelity simulator for a planar range sensor · ICRA 2015

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

data-driven modeling · 0.4semantic terrain primitives · 0.3hybrid geometric terrain representation · 0.3list prediction · 0.2conseqopt · 0.2visibility and accessibility relations · 0.2greedy algorithm · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2018 Off-Road Lidar Simulation with Data-Driven Terrain Primitives
abstract
Developing software for large scale off-road robot applications is challenging and tedious due to cost, logistics, and rigor of field testing. High-fidelity sensor-realistic simulation can speed up the development process for perception and state estimation algorithms. We focus on Lidar simulation for robots operating in off-road environments. Lidars are integral sensors for robots, and Lidar simulation for off-road environments is particularly challenging due to the way Lidar rays interact with natural terrain such as vegetation. A hybrid geometric terrain representation has been shown to model Lidar observations well [1]. However, previous work has only been able to simulate a single, fixed scene, and the entire scene had to be precisely surveyed. In this work, we add semantic information to the hybrid geometric model. This allows us to extract terrain primitives, such as trees and shrubs, from data logs. Our approach uses these primitives to compose arbitrary scenes for Lidar simulation. We evaluate our simulator on a real-world environment of interest, and show that primitives derived using our approach generalize to new scenes.
Abhijeet Tallavajhula, Çetin Meriçli, Alonzo Kelly
ICRA1
2016 List prediction applied to motion planning
abstract
There is growing interest in applying machine learning to motion planning. Potential applications are predicting an initial seed for trajectory optimization, predicting an effective heuristic for search based planning, and even predicting a planning algorithm for adaptive motion planning systems. In these situations, providing only a single prediction is unsatisfactory. It leads to many scenarios where the prediction suffers a high loss. In this paper, we advocate list prediction. Each predictor in a list focusses on different regions in the space of environments. This overcomes the shortcoming of a single predictor, and improves overall performance. A framework for list prediction, ConseqOpt, already exists. Our contribution is an extensive domain-specific treatment. We provide a rigorous and clear exposition of the procedure for training a list of predictors. We provide experimental results on a spectrum of motion planning applications. Each application contributes to understanding the behavior of list prediction. We observe that the benefit of list prediction over a single prediction is significant, irrespective of the application.
Abhijeet Tallavajhula, Sanjiban Choudhury, Sebastian A. Scherer, Alonzo Kelly
ICRA1
2016 Nonparametric distribution regression applied to sensor modeling
abstract
Sensor models, which specify the distribution of sensor observations, are a widely used and integral part of robotics algorithms. Observation distributions are commonly approximated by parametric models, which are limited in their expressiveness, and may require careful design to suit an application. In this paper, we propose nonparametric distribution regression as a procedure to model sensors. It is a data-driven procedure to predict distributions that makes few assumptions. We apply the procedure to model raw distributions from real sensors, and also demonstrate its utility to a mobile robot state estimation task. We show that nonparametric distribution regression adapts to characteristics in the training data, leading to realistic predictions. The same procedure competes favorably with baseline parametric models across applications. The results also help develop intuition for different sensor modeling situations. Our procedure is useful when distributions are inherently noisy, and sufficient data is available.
Abhijeet Tallavajhula, Barnabás Póczos, Alonzo Kelly
IROS1
2015 Construction and validation of a high fidelity simulator for a planar range sensor
abstract
We study the problem of building a sensor model for the purpose of simulation. Our work is motivated by the potential impact of realistic simulators on the development cycle of software for real robots. The case is made for building models from approximate state information, relieving the burden of ground truth. Unlike calibration, where the goal is to identify and remove error from a signal, our aim to reproduce the signal in its entirety, including its error properties. Instead of physically modeling sensor behavior, a data-driven approach is taken. The implementation of our approach to simulate a simple but noisy laser rangefinder is described. Finally, approaches to validate the simulator are discussed. We compare not only raw sensor predictions, but also overall performance of algorithms on simulated versus real data.
Abhijeet Tallavajhula, Alonzo Kelly
ICRA1
2013 Object search by manipulation
abstract
We investigate the problem of a robot searching for an object. This requires reasoning about both perception and manipulation: certain objects are moved because the target may be hidden behind them and others are moved because they block the manipulator's access to other objects. We contribute a formulation of the object search by manipulation problem using visibility and accessibility relations between objects. We also propose a greedy algorithm and show that it is optimal under certain conditions. We propose a second algorithm which is optimal under all conditions. This algorithm takes advantage of the structure of the visibility and accessibility relations between objects to quickly generate optimal plans. Finally, we demonstrate an implementation of both algorithms on a real robot using a real object detection system.
Mehmet Remzi Dogar, Michael C. Koval, Abhijeet Tallavajhula, Siddhartha S. Srinivasa
ICRA3