Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Harsh Pandey

dblp:135/8401 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · unresolved

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Trustworthy machine learning · 71% Graph learning · 14% Motion planning and robot control · 8%

Topics — the 13 heaviest of 13, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability › model explanation
global explanation
0.912025
GnnXemplar: Exemplars to Explanations - Natural Language Rules for Global GNN Interpretability · NeurIPS 2025
Machine learning › Graph learning
graph neural network
0.912025
GnnXemplar: Exemplars to Explanations - Natural Language Rules for Global GNN Interpretability · NeurIPS 2025
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability
graph neural network explanation
0.912025
GnnXemplar: Exemplars to Explanations - Natural Language Rules for Global GNN Interpretability · NeurIPS 2025
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability
0.912025
GnnXemplar: Exemplars to Explanations - Natural Language Rules for Global GNN Interpretability · NeurIPS 2025
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability
natural language explanation
0.912025
GnnXemplar: Exemplars to Explanations - Natural Language Rules for Global GNN Interpretability · NeurIPS 2025
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability
post-hoc explanation
0.912025
GnnXemplar: Exemplars to Explanations - Natural Language Rules for Global GNN Interpretability · NeurIPS 2025
Robotics › Legged, aerial and field robots
aerial robots
0.212013
Path planning for non-circular micro aerial vehicles in constrained environments · ICRA 2013
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › motion planning
anytime planning
0.212013
Path planning for non-circular micro aerial vehicles in constrained environments · ICRA 2013
Robotics › Legged, aerial and field robots › aerial robots › UAV navigation
micro aerial vehicle navigation
0.212013
Path planning for non-circular micro aerial vehicles in constrained environments · ICRA 2013
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
motion planning
0.212013
Path planning for non-circular micro aerial vehicles in constrained environments · ICRA 2013
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
path planning
0.212013
Path planning for non-circular micro aerial vehicles in constrained environments · ICRA 2013
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction › heuristic search › best-first search
a* search
0.012013
Path planning for non-circular micro aerial vehicles in constrained environments · ICRA 2013
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction
graph search
0.012013
Path planning for non-circular micro aerial vehicles in constrained environments · ICRA 2013

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

prompt engineering · 0.9large language model · 0.9greedy approximation · 0.9coverage maximization · 0.9motion primitives · 0.2lattice-based planning · 0.2anytime a* · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 GnnXemplar: Exemplars to Explanations - Natural Language Rules for Global GNN Interpretability
abstract
Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) are widely used for node classification, yet their opaque decision-making limits trust and adoption. While local explanations offer insights into individual predictions, global explanation methods—those that characterize an entire class—remain underdeveloped. Existing global explainers rely on motif discovery in small graphs, an approach that breaks down in large, real-world settings where subgraph repetition is rare, node attributes are high-dimensional, and predictions arise from complex structure-attribute interactions. We propose GnnXemplar, a novel global explainer inspired from Exemplar Theory from cognitive science. GnnXemplar identifies representative nodes in the GNN embedding space—exemplars—and explains predictions using natural language rules derived from their neighborhoods. Exemplar selection is framed as a coverage maximization problem over reverse $k$-nearest neighbors, for which we provide an efficient greedy approximation. To derive interpretable rules, we employ a self-refining prompt strategy using large language models (LLMs). Experiments across diverse benchmarks show that GnnXemplar significantly outperforms existing methods in fidelity, scalability, and human interpretability, as validated by a user study with 60 participants.
Burouj Armgaan, Eshan Jain, Harsh Pandey, Mahesh Chandran, Sayan Ranu
NeurIPS3
2013 Path planning for non-circular micro aerial vehicles in constrained environments
abstract
Operating micro aerial vehicles (MAVs) outside of the bounds of a rigidly controlled lab environment, specifically one that is unstructured and contains unknown obstacles, poses a number of challenges. One of these challenges is that of quickly determining an optimal (or nearly so) path from the MAVs current position to a designated goal state. Past work in this area using full-size unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) has predominantly been performed in benign environments. However, due to their small size, MAVs are capable of operating in indoor environments which are more cluttered. This requires planners to account for the vehicle heading in addition to its spatial position in order to successfully navigate. In addition, due to the short flight times of MAVs along with the inherent hazards of operating in close proximity to obstacles, we desire the trajectories to be as cost-optimal as possible. Our approach uses an anytime planner based on A* that performs a graph search on a four-dimensional (4-D) (x,y,z, heading) lattice. This allows for the generation of close-to-optimal trajectories based on a set of precomputed motion primitives along with the capability to provide trajectories in real-time allowing for on-the-fly re-planning as new sensor data is received. We also account for arbitrary vehicle shapes, permitting the use of a non-circular footprint during the planning process. By not using the overly conservative circumscribed circle for collision checking, we are capable of successfully finding optimal paths through cluttered environments including those with narrow hallways. Analytically, we show that our planner provides bounds on the sub-optimality of the solution it finds. Experimentally, we show that the planner can operate in real-time in both a simulated and real-world cluttered environments.
Brian MacAllister, Jonathan Butzke, Aleksandr Kushleyev, Harsh Pandey, Maxim Likhachev
ICRA4