EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Alex B. Jose
dblp:135/8414
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2013
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1Systems, architecture and hardware · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Automated reasoning and model checking · 100% | |
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Robot navigation and mapping · 50% Video understanding and tracking · 50% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Automated reasoning and model checking › reactive synthesis
GR(1) synthesis |
0.2 | 1 | 2013 | Patching task-level robot controllers based on a local μ-calculus formula · ICRA 2013 |
Automated reasoning and model checking
reactive synthesis |
0.2 | 1 | 2013 | Patching task-level robot controllers based on a local μ-calculus formula · ICRA 2013 |
Automated reasoning and model checking › synthesis
temporal logic synthesis |
0.2 | 1 | 2013 | Patching task-level robot controllers based on a local μ-calculus formula · ICRA 2013 |
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping
mobile robot navigation |
0.0 | 1 | 2013 | Patching task-level robot controllers based on a local μ-calculus formula · ICRA 2013 |
Computer vision › Video understanding and tracking
video surveillance |
0.0 | 1 | 2013 | Patching task-level robot controllers based on a local μ-calculus formula · ICRA 2013 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
μ-calculus · 0.3local strategy computation · 0.3
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 | Patching task-level robot controllers based on a local μ-calculus formulaabstractWe present a method for mending strategies for GR(1) specifications. Given the addition or removal of edges from the game graph describing a problem (essentially transition rules in a GR(1) specification), we apply a μ-calculus formula to a neighborhood of states to obtain a “local strategy” that navigates around the invalidated parts of an original synthesized strategy. Our method may thus avoid global resynthesis while recovering correctness with respect to the new specification. We illustrate the results both in simulation and on physical hardware for a planar robot surveillance task. Scott C. Livingston, Pavithra Prabhakar, Alex B. Jose, Richard M. Murray |
ICRA | 3 |