Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Elizabeth Basha
dblp:136/0043 · also Elizabeth A. Basha
· DBLP profile ↗
7ranked-venue papers
4as first author
0since 2021 · last 2017
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 1 first-authorSystems, architecture and hardware · 3 · 1 first-authorComputer networks · 3 · 2 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer networks
4 papers |
Internet of things and sensor networks · 80% Physical-layer communications · 16% Vehicular, aerial and satellite networks · 5% | |
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Robot navigation and mapping · 54% Legged, aerial and field robots · 46% |
Topics — the 11 heaviest of 11, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Internet of things and sensor networks › wireless sensor network
sensor deployment |
0.5 | 3 | 2015 | On air-to-water radio communication between UAVs and water sensor networks · ICRA 2015 Controlled sensor network installation with unmanned aerial vehicles · SenSys 2014 Surface classification for sensor deployment from UAV landings · ICRA 2015 |
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping
terrain classification |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | Surface classification for sensor deployment from UAV landings · ICRA 2015 |
Physical-layer communications › optical wireless communication
air-water communication |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | On air-to-water radio communication between UAVs and water sensor networks · ICRA 2015 |
Internet of things and sensor networks
underwater sensor networks |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | On air-to-water radio communication between UAVs and water sensor networks · ICRA 2015 |
Robotics › Legged, aerial and field robots › aerial robots
unmanned aerial vehicle |
0.2 | 1 | 2014 | Controlled sensor network installation with unmanned aerial vehicles · SenSys 2014 |
Internet of things and sensor networks
wireless sensor network |
0.2 | 1 | 2014 | Controlled sensor network installation with unmanned aerial vehicles · SenSys 2014 |
Internet of things and sensor networks › environmental sensing
environmental sensor network |
0.1 | 1 | 2008 | Model-based monitoring for early warning flood detection · SenSys 2008 |
Internet of things and sensor networks › wireless sensor network
sensor network architecture |
0.1 | 1 | 2008 | Model-based monitoring for early warning flood detection · SenSys 2008 |
Internet of things and sensor networks › delay tolerant networks
data muling |
0.1 | 1 | 2015 | On air-to-water radio communication between UAVs and water sensor networks · ICRA 2015 |
Vehicular, aerial and satellite networks
UAV communication |
0.1 | 1 | 2015 | On air-to-water radio communication between UAVs and water sensor networks · ICRA 2015 |
Embedded and real-time systems
cyber-physical system platforms |
0.0 | 1 | 2008 | Model-based monitoring for early warning flood detection · SenSys 2008 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
decision tree · 0.4accelerometer features · 0.4SVM · 0.4QDA · 0.4LDA · 0.4surface classification · 0.4field experiments · 0.2energy analysis · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 | Autonomous meta-classifier for surface hardness classification from UAV landingsabstractDeveloping surface classification models manually requires significant time and detracts from the goal of automating systems. We create a system that automatically collects the data using an Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV), extracts features, trains a large number of classifiers, selects the best classifier, and programs the UAV with that classifier. Motivating our work is a prior project [1] that manually developed a surface classifier using an accelerometer; to verify our system functionality, we replicate those results with our new automated system and improve on those results, providing a four-surface classifier with a 75% classification rate and a hard/soft classifier with a 100% classification rate. We further verify our system through a field experiment that collects and classifies new data, proving its end-to-end functionality. Overall, our system reduces the time and machine learning expertise needed by the user to develop new time-series classifiers usable by the UAV. The general form of our system provides a valuable tool for automation of classifier creation and is released as an open-source tool [2]. Elizabeth Basha, Tristan Watts-Willis, Carrick Detweiler |
IROS | 1 |
| 2015 | Surface classification for sensor deployment from UAV landingsabstractUsing Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) to deploy sensor networks promises an autonomous and useful method of installation in remote or hard to access locations. Some sensors, such as soil moisture sensors, must be physically installed in soft soil, yet UAVs cannot easily determine soil softness with remote sensors. In this paper, we use data from an onboard accelerometer measured during UAV landings to determine the softness of the ground. We collect and analyze over 200 data sets gathered from 8 different materials: foam, carpet, wood, tile, grass, dirt, concrete, and woodchips. Based on this analysis, we examine a number of features from the accelerometer and four classification algorithms: LDA, QDA, SVM, and binary decision trees. The decision tree performs well and is simple to implement onboard the UAV. We implement this in our UAV control system and perform experiments to verify that the UAV can accurately classify the softness of the surface with 90% accuracy. This lays the groundwork for our future work on developing a UAV capable of installing sensors in soft soil. David J. Anthony, Elizabeth Basha, Jared Ostdiek, John-Paul Ore, Carrick Detweiler |
ICRA | 2 |
| 2015 | On air-to-water radio communication between UAVs and water sensor networksabstractOcean monitoring using underwater sensor networks faces communication challenges in retrieving data, communicating large amounts of data between nodes, and covering increasing spatial regions while remaining connected. With underwater sensor networks that are capable of surfacing, unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) provide a solution to this by providing radio-based data muling services, but, as this area is still unexplored, the utility of this solution is unclear. In this paper, we examine the theoretical expectations, perform several field experiments, and analyze the communication success rates of 802.15.4 radios near the water surface both communicating between surface nodes as well as between a node and the UAV. These indicate that on the water surface internode radio communication is poor, but node to UAV communication can provide both reasonable ranges and success rates. We additionally measure and analyze the energy aspects of the systems, determining the impacts of parameters such as network size and distance between nodes on the UAV energy. Finally, we consolidate the information into an algorithm outlining how to configure and design hybrid UAV and underwater sensor network systems. Jacob Palmer, Nicholas Yuen, John-Paul Ore, Carrick Detweiler, Elizabeth Basha |
ICRA | 5 |
| 2015 | In-Network Distributed Solar Current PredictionabstractLong-term sensor network deployments demand careful power management. While managing power requires understanding the amount of energy harvestable from the local environment, current solar prediction methods rely only on recent local history, which makes them susceptible to high variability. In this article, we present a model and algorithms for distributed solar current prediction based on multiple linear regression to predict future solar current based on local, in situ climatic and solar measurements. These algorithms leverage spatial information from neighbors and adapt to the changing local conditions not captured by global climatic information. We implement these algorithms on our Fleck platform and run a 7-week-long experiment validating our work. In analyzing our results from this experiment, we determined that computing our model requires an increased energy expenditure of 4.5mJ over simpler models (on the order of 10 -7 % of the harvested energy) to gain a prediction improvement of 39.7%. Elizabeth Basha, Raja Jurdak, Daniela Rus |
ACM Trans. Sens. Networks | 1 |
| 2014 | Controlled sensor network installation with unmanned aerial vehiclesabstractRobots improve wireless sensor network (WSN) deployments by reducing deployment times, deploying nodes to improve coverage, and ferrying data. Utilizing Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) to install sensor networks in environmentally sensitive areas is especially valuable, as the UAVs are able to quickly traverse rough and environmentally sensitive terrain. UAV based deployments are challenging, as the UAVs may need to install nodes in a specific orientation or location type, which is difficult to sense from a UAV. We present our work towards resolving these difficulties by first classifying the surface a UAV has landed on, and then conducting a post-deployment analysis of the installation. David J. Anthony, John-Paul Ore, Carrick Detweiler, Elizabeth Basha |
SenSys | 4 |
| 2008 | Model-based monitoring for early warning flood detectionabstractPredictive environmental sensor networks provide complex engineering and systems challenges. These systems must withstand the event of interest, remain functional over long time periods when no events occur, cover large geographical regions of interest to the event, and support the variety of sensor types needed to detect the phenomenon. Prediction of the phenomenon on the network complicates the system further, requiring additional computation on themicrocontrollers and utilizing prediction models that are not typically designed for sensor networks. This paper describes a system architecture and deployment to meet the design requirements and to allow model-driven control, thereby optimizing the prediction capability of the system. We explore the application of river flood prediction using this architecture, describing our work on a centralized form of the prediction model, network implementation, component testing and infrastructure development in Honduras, deployment on a river in Massachusetts, and results of the field experiments. Our system uses only a small number of nodes to cover basins of 1000-10000 square km2 using an unique heterogeneous communication structure to provide real-time sensed data, incorporating self-monitoring for failure, and adapting measurement schedules to capture events of interest. Elizabeth Basha, Sai Ravela, Daniela Rus |
SenSys | 1 |
| 2007 | Design of early warning flood detection systems for developing countriesabstractIn developing countries, flooding due to natural disasters such as hurricanes and earthquakes results in massive loss of life and property. Warning communities of the incoming flood provides an effective solution to this by giving people sufficient time to evacuate and protect their property. However, the range of early warning system solutions introduces a tangle of conflicting requirements including cost and reliability, and creates several interesting problems from factors as diverse as technological, social, and political. The complexity of these systems and need for autonomy within the context of a developing country while remaining maintainable and accessible by non-technical personnel provides a challenge not often solved within developed countries, much less the developing. After describing this problem, the paper discusses a proposed solution for the problem, initial experiments in implementing the solution, and lessons learned through that work. Elizabeth Basha, Daniela Rus |
ICTD | 1 |