EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Selvaprabu Nadarajah
dblp:136/8416 · also Selvaprabuh Nadarajah
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · unresolved
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 1 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Theoretical computer science
3 papers |
Mathematical optimization · 100% | |
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Reinforcement learning · 100% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Computational social science and digital humanities · 100% |
Topics — the 10 heaviest of 10, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Mathematical optimization › numerical analysis
level set methods |
1.3 | 2 | 2025 | An Adaptive Parameter-free and Projection-free Restarting Level Set Method for Constrained Convex Optimization Under the Error Bound Condition · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2025 A Data Efficient and Feasible Level Set Method for Stochastic Convex Optimization with Expectation Constraints · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2020 |
Mathematical optimization
constrained optimization |
1.0 | 2 | 2025 | An Adaptive Parameter-free and Projection-free Restarting Level Set Method for Constrained Convex Optimization Under the Error Bound Condition · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2025 SMOILE: A Shopper Marketing Optimization and Inverse Learning Engine · KDD 2019 |
Mathematical optimization › continuous optimization
convex optimization |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | An Adaptive Parameter-free and Projection-free Restarting Level Set Method for Constrained Convex Optimization Under the Error Bound Condition · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2025 |
Mathematical optimization › continuous optimization › convex optimization
first-order methods |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | An Adaptive Parameter-free and Projection-free Restarting Level Set Method for Constrained Convex Optimization Under the Error Bound Condition · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2025 |
Mathematical optimization › continuous optimization › convex optimization › first-order methods
projection-free methods |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | An Adaptive Parameter-free and Projection-free Restarting Level Set Method for Constrained Convex Optimization Under the Error Bound Condition · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2025 |
Mathematical optimization › continuous optimization › convex optimization › first-order methods
mirror descent |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | A Data Efficient and Feasible Level Set Method for Stochastic Convex Optimization with Expectation Constraints · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2020 |
Mathematical optimization › stochastic optimization
stochastic convex optimization |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | A Data Efficient and Feasible Level Set Method for Stochastic Convex Optimization with Expectation Constraints · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2020 |
Mathematical optimization › stochastic optimization
stochastic first-order methods |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | A Data Efficient and Feasible Level Set Method for Stochastic Convex Optimization with Expectation Constraints · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2020 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › imitation learning
inverse reinforcement learning |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | SMOILE: A Shopper Marketing Optimization and Inverse Learning Engine · KDD 2019 |
Computational social science and digital humanities › marketing
marketing optimization |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | SMOILE: A Shopper Marketing Optimization and Inverse Learning Engine · KDD 2019 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
level set method · 1.3regression · 1.1inverse reinforcement learning · 1.1constrained optimization · 1.1projection-free subgradient method · 0.9error bound condition · 0.9online validation · 0.4mirror descent · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | An Adaptive Parameter-free and Projection-free Restarting Level Set Method for Constrained Convex Optimization Under the Error Bound ConditionabstractRecent efforts to accelerate first-order methods have focused on convex optimization problems that satisfy a geometric property known as error-bound condition, which covers a broad class of problems, including piece-wise linear programs and strongly convex programs. Parameter-free first-order methods that employ projection-free updates have the potential to broaden the benefit of acceleration. Such a method has been developed for unconstrained convex optimization but is lacking for general constrained convex optimization. We propose a parameter-free level-set method for the latter constrained case based on projection-free subgradient method that exhibits accelerated convergence for problems that satisfy an error-bound condition. Our method maintains a separate copy of the level-set sub-problem for each level parameter value and restarts the computation of these copies based on objective function progress. Applying such a restarting scheme in a level-set context is novel and results in an algorithm that dynamically adapts the precision of each copy. This property is key to extending prior restarting methods based on static precision that have been proposed for unconstrained convex optimization to handle constraints. We report promising numerical performance relative to benchmark methods. Qihang Lin, Negar Soheili, Runchao Ma, Selvaprabu Nadarajah |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 4 |
| 2020 | A Data Efficient and Feasible Level Set Method for Stochastic Convex Optimization with Expectation ConstraintsabstractStochastic convex optimization problems with expectation constraints (SOECs) are encountered in statistics and machine learning, business, and engineering. The SOEC objective and constraints contain expectations defined with respect to complex distributions or large data sets, leading to high computational complexity when solved by the algorithms that use exact functions and their gradients. Recent stochastic first order methods exhibit low computational complexity when handling SOECs but guarantee near-feasibility and near-optimality only at convergence. These methods may thus return highly infeasible solutions when heuristically terminated, as is often the case, due to theoretical convergence criteria being highly conservative. This issue limits the use of first order methods in several applications where the SOEC constraints encode implementation requirements. We design a stochastic feasible level set method (SFLS) for SOECs that has low complexity and emphasizes feasibility before convergence. Specifically, our level-set method solves a root-finding problem by calling a novel first order oracle that computes a stochastic upper bound on the level-set function by extending mirror descent and online validation techniques. We establish that SFLS maintains a high-probability feasible solution at each root-finding iteration and exhibits favorable complexity compared to state-of-the-art deterministic feasible level set and stochastic subgradient methods. Numerical experiments on three diverse applications highlight how SFLS finds feasible solutions with small optimality gaps with lower complexity than the former approaches. Qihang Lin, Selvaprabu Nadarajah, Negar Soheili, Tianbao Yang |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 2 |
| 2019 | SMOILE: A Shopper Marketing Optimization and Inverse Learning EngineabstractProduct brands employ shopper marketing (SM) strategies to convert shoppers along the path to purchase. Traditional marketing mix models (MMMs), which leverage regression techniques and historical data, can be used to predict the component of sales lift due to SM tactics. The resulting predictive model is a critical input to plan future SM strategies. The implementation of traditional MMMs, however, requires significant ad-hoc manual intervention due to their limited flexibility in (i) explicitly capturing the temporal link between decisions; (ii) accounting for the interaction between business rules and past (sales and decision) data during the attribution of lift to SM; and (iii) ensuring that future decisions adhere to business rules. These issues necessitate MMMs with tailored structures for specific products and retailers, each requiring significant hand-engineering to achieve satisfactory performance -- a major implementation challenge. We propose an SM Optimization and Inverse Learning Engine (SMOILE) that combines optimization and inverse reinforcement learning to streamline implementation. SMOILE learns a model of lift by viewing SM tactic choice as a sequential process, leverages inverse reinforcement learning to explicitly couple sales and decision data, and employs an optimization approach to handle a wide-array of business rules. Using a unique dataset containing sales and SM spend information across retailers and products, we illustrate how SMOILE standardizes the use of data to prescribe future SM decisions. We also track an industry benchmark to showcase the importance of encoding SM lift and decision structures to mitigate spurious results when uncovering the impact of SM decisions. Abhilash Reddy Chenreddy, Parshan Pakiman, Selvaprabu Nadarajah, C. Ranganathan, Rick Abens |
KDD | 3 |