We present an effective methodology for the formal verification of practical cryptographic protocol implementations written in Rust. Within a single proof framework, we show how to develop machine-checked proofs of diverse properties like runtime safety, parsing correctness, and cryptographic protocol security. All analysis tasks are driven by the software developer who writes annotations in the Rust source code and chooses a backend prover for each task, ranging from a generic proof assistant like F* to dedicated crypto-oriented provers like ProVerif and SSProve Our main contribution is a demonstration of this methodology on Bert13, a portable, post-quantum implementation of TLS 1.3 written in Rust and verified both for security and functional correctness. To our knowledge, this is the first security verification result for a protocol implementation written in Rust, and the first verified post-quantum TLS 1.3 library.

Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies have recently introduced support for Schnorr signatures whose cleaner algebraic structure, as compared to ECDSA, allows for simpler and more practical constructions of highly demanded ''t-of-n'' threshold signatures. However, existing Schnorr threshold signature schemes still fall short of the needs of real-world applications due to their assumption that the network is synchronous and due to their lack of robustness, i.e., the guarantee that t honest signers are able to obtain a valid signature even in the presence of other malicious signers who try to disrupt the protocol. This hinders the adoption of threshold signatures in the cryptocurrency ecosystem, e.g., in second-layer protocols built on top of cryptocurrencies.

Group signatures present a compromise between the traditional goals of digital signatures and the need for signer privacy, allowing for the creation of unforgeable signatures in the name of a group which reveal nothing about the actual signer's identity beyond their group membership. An important consideration that is absent in prevalent models is that group membership itself may be sensitive information, especially if group membership is dynamic, i.e. membership status may change over time. We address this issue by introducing formal notions of membership privacy for fully dynamic group signature schemes, which can be easily integrated into the most expressive models of group signature security to date. We then propose a generic construction for a fully dynamic group signature scheme with membership privacy that is based on signatures with flexible public key (SFPK) and signatures on equivalence classes (SPSEQ). Finally, we devise novel techniques for SFPK to construct a highly efficient standard model scheme (i.e. without random oracles) that provides shorter signatures than even the non-private state-of-the-art from standard assumptions. This shows that, although the strictly stronger security notions we introduce have been completely unexplored in the study of fully dynamic group signatures so far, they do not come at an additional cost in practice.

A sanitizable signature scheme is a malleable signature scheme where a designated third party has the permission to modify certain parts of the message and adapt the signature accordingly. This primitive was introduced by Ateniese et al . (ESORICS 2005) and Brzuska et al . (PKC 2009) formalized the initially suggested five security properties. In the subsequent year, Brzuska et al . (PKC 2010) introduced a notion called unlinkability where the basic idea is that linking message‐signature pairs of the same document should be infeasible. Brzuska et al . formalized this notion and suggested a generic instantiation based on group signatures with a special structure. Unfortunately, the most efficient instantiations of group signatures do not have this property. In this work, we present the first efficient construction of unlinkable sanitizable signatures based on a novel type of signature schemes with re‐randomizable keys. This property allows one to re‐randomize both the signing and the verification key separately but consistently. Given a signature scheme with re‐randomizable keys, we obtain a sanitizable signature scheme by signing the message with a re‐randomized key and proving in zero‐knowledge that the derived key originates from either the signer or the sanitizer. To obtain an efficient instantiation, we instantiate this generic idea with Schnorr signatures and efficient ‐protocols that we turn into a non‐interactive zero‐knowledge proof via the Fiat‐Shamir transformation. In this work, we present an optimized version that is more efficient than the construction we suggested in the extended abstract of this work at PKC 2016.

Password authentication still constitutes the most widespread authentication concept on the Internet today, but the human incapability to memorize safe passwords has left this concept vulnerable to various attacks ever since. Affected enterprises such as Facebook now strive to mitigate such attacks by involving external cryptographic services that harden passwords. Everspaugh et al.~provided the first comprehensive formal treatment of such a service, and proposed the Pythia PRF-Service as a cryptographically secure solution (Usenix Security'15). Pythia relies on a novel cryptographic primitive called partially oblivious pseudorandom functions and its security is proven under a strong new interactive assumption in the random oracle model.

The use of public-key steganography has been proposed for several censorship-resistance systems. However, distribution of the employed public keys presents an availability, scalability, and security challenge in many of these. To mitigate this problem, we introduce the notion of identity-based steganography. In particular, we define identity-based steganographic tagging (IBST), which allows a sender to produce a steganographic tag for a recipient's identity such that the tag can only be recognized by the intended recipient using her (identity-based) private key. We instantiate our definition by an efficient IBST scheme, provably secure under the bilinear decisional Diffie-Hellman assumption. We find IBST to be particularly useful when the censors are able to impede distribution of cryptographic keys or break forward security by compromising system agents. As two representative applications of IBST to censorship resistance systems, we first present an efficient and dynamic solution for the key distribution problem in Collage and second, we demonstrate that IBST can improve the scalability of Message in a Bottle.