Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Dana Movshovitz-Attias
dblp:136/8637
· DBLP profile ↗
6ranked-venue papers
3as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 2 first-authorDatabases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2 · 2 first-authorSoftware engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
3 papers |
Information extraction and text analysis · 47% Graph learning · 20% Learning paradigms · 20% | |
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Program analysis · 77% Software testing · 23% |
Topics — the 7 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
emotion recognition |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | GoEmotions: A Dataset of Fine-Grained Emotions · ACL 2020 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › emotion recognition
fine-grained emotion classification |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | GoEmotions: A Dataset of Fine-Grained Emotions · ACL 2020 |
Machine learning › Graph learning
graph neural network |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Graph Agreement Models for Semi-Supervised Learning · NeurIPS 2019 |
Machine learning › Learning paradigms
semi-supervised learning |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Graph Agreement Models for Semi-Supervised Learning · NeurIPS 2019 |
Program analysis › static analysis
bug detection |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Bugram: bug detection with n-gram language models · ASE 2016 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › knowledge acquisition
knowledge base construction |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | KB-LDA: Jointly Learning a Knowledge Base of Hierarchy, Relations, and Facts · ACL (1) 2015 |
Software testing
software reliability |
0.1 | 1 | 2016 | Bugram: bug detection with n-gram language models · ASE 2016 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
label propagation · 0.4co-training · 0.4statistical language model · 0.2n-gram language model · 0.2latent dirichlet allocation · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | GoEmotions: A Dataset of Fine-Grained EmotionsabstractUnderstanding emotion expressed in language has a wide range of applications, from building empathetic chatbots to detecting harmful online behavior. Advancement in this area can be improved using large-scale datasets with a fine-grained typology, adaptable to multiple downstream tasks. We introduce GoEmotions, the largest manually annotated dataset of 58k English Reddit comments, labeled for 27 emotion categories or Neutral. We demonstrate the high quality of the annotations via Principal Preserved Component Analysis. We conduct transfer learning experiments with existing emotion benchmarks to show that our dataset generalizes well to other domains and different emotion taxonomies. Our BERT-based model achieves an average F1-score of .46 across our proposed taxonomy, leaving much room for improvement. Dorottya Demszky, Dana Movshovitz-Attias, Jeongwoo Ko, Alan Cowen, Gaurav Nemade, Sujith Ravi |
ACL | 2 |
| 2019 | Graph Agreement Models for Semi-Supervised LearningabstractGraph-based algorithms are among the most successful paradigms for solving semi-supervised learning tasks. Recent work on graph convolutional networks and neural graph learning methods has successfully combined the expressiveness of neural networks with graph structures. We propose a technique that, when applied to these methods, achieves state-of-the-art results on semi-supervised learning datasets. Traditional graph-based algorithms, such as label propagation, were designed with the underlying assumption that the label of a node can be imputed from that of the neighboring nodes. However, real-world graphs are either noisy or have edges that do not correspond to label agreement. To address this, we propose Graph Agreement Models (GAM), which introduces an auxiliary model that predicts the probability of two nodes sharing the same label as a learned function of their features. The agreement model is used when training a node classification model by encouraging agreement only for the pairs of nodes it deems likely to have the same label, thus guiding its parameters to better local optima. The classification and agreement models are trained jointly in a co-training fashion. Moreover, GAM can also be applied to any semi-supervised classification problem, by inducing a graph whenever one is not provided. We demonstrate that our method achieves a relative improvement of up to 72% for various node classification models, and obtains state-of-the-art results on multiple established datasets. Otilia Stretcu, Krishnamurthy Viswanathan, Dana Movshovitz-Attias, Emmanouil A. Platanios, Sujith Ravi, Andrew Tomkins |
NeurIPS | 3 |
| 2016 | Bugram: bug detection with n-gram language modelsabstractTo improve software reliability, many rule-based techniques have been proposed to infer programming rules and detect violations of these rules as bugs. These rule-based approaches often rely on the highly frequent appearances of certain patterns in a project to infer rules. It is known that if a pattern does not appear frequently enough, rules are not learned, thus missing many bugs. Song Wang 0009, Devin Chollak, Dana Movshovitz-Attias, Lin Tan 0001 |
ASE | 3 |
| 2015 | KB-LDA: Jointly Learning a Knowledge Base of Hierarchy, Relations, and FactsabstractDana Movshovitz-Attias, William W. Cohen. Proceedings of the 53rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 7th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2015. Dana Movshovitz-Attias, William W. Cohen |
ACL (1) | 1 |
| 2015 | Discovering Subsumption Relationships for Web-Based OntologiesabstractAs search engines are becoming smarter at interpreting user queries and providing meaningful responses, they rely on ontologies to understand the meaning of entities. Creating ontologies manually is a laborious process, and resulting ontologies may not reflect the way users think about the world, as many concepts used in queries are noisy, and not easily amenable to formal modeling. There has been considerable effort in generating ontologies from Web text and query streams, which may be more reflective of how users query and write content. In this paper, we describe the LATTE system that automatically generates a subconcept--superconcept hierarchy, which is critical for using ontologies to answer queries. LATTE combines signals based on word-vector representations of concepts and dependency parse trees; however, LATTE derives most of its power from an ontology of attributes extracted from the Web that indicates the aspects of concepts that users find important. LATTE achieves an F1 score of 74%, which is comparable to expert agreement on a similar task. We additionally demonstrate the usefulness of LATTE in detecting high quality concepts from an existing resource of IsA links. Dana Movshovitz-Attias, Steven Euijong Whang, Natasha F. Noy, Alon Y. Halevy |
WebDB | 1 |
| 2013 | Analysis of the reputation system and user contributions on a question answering website: StackOverflowabstractQuestion answering (Q&A) communities have been gaining popularity in the past few years. The success of such sites depends mainly on the contribution of a small number of expert users who provide a significant portion of the helpful answers, and so identifying users that have the potential of becoming strong contributers is an important task for owners of such communities. Dana Movshovitz-Attias, Yair Movshovitz-Attias, Peter Steenkiste, Christos Faloutsos |
ASONAM | 1 |