Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Volkan Cirik

dblp:136/8682 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
5ranked-venue papers
3as first author
1since 2021 · last 2022
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 3 first-author · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
4 papers
Vision and language · 55% Reinforcement learning · 11% 3D vision · 8%

Topics — the 10 heaviest of 10, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computer vision › Vision and language › visual grounding
referring expression recognition
1.332022
HOLM: Hallucinating Objects with Language Models for Referring Expression Recognition in Partially-Observed Scenes · ACL (1) 2022
Refer360$^\circ$: A Referring Expression Recognition Dataset in 360$^\circ$ Images · ACL 2020
Using Syntax to Ground Referring Expressions in Natural Images · AAAI 2018
Computer vision › Vision and language › visual grounding
language grounding
1.022022
HOLM: Hallucinating Objects with Language Models for Referring Expression Recognition in Partially-Observed Scenes · ACL (1) 2022
Refer360$^\circ$: A Referring Expression Recognition Dataset in 360$^\circ$ Images · ACL 2020
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
partial observability
0.612022
HOLM: Hallucinating Objects with Language Models for Referring Expression Recognition in Partially-Observed Scenes · ACL (1) 2022
Computer vision › 3D vision › omnidirectional vision
360-degree images
0.412020
Refer360$^\circ$: A Referring Expression Recognition Dataset in 360$^\circ$ Images · ACL 2020
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping › visual navigation
language-guided navigation
0.412020
Refer360$^\circ$: A Referring Expression Recognition Dataset in 360$^\circ$ Images · ACL 2020
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
data augmentation
0.312018
Speaker-Follower Models for Vision-and-Language Navigation · NeurIPS 2018
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
instruction following
0.312018
Speaker-Follower Models for Vision-and-Language Navigation · NeurIPS 2018
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › pragmatics
pragmatic reasoning
0.312018
Speaker-Follower Models for Vision-and-Language Navigation · NeurIPS 2018
Computer vision › Vision and language
vision-and-language navigation
0.312018
Speaker-Follower Models for Vision-and-Language Navigation · NeurIPS 2018
Computer vision › Vision and language
visual grounding
0.312018
Using Syntax to Ground Referring Expressions in Natural Images · AAAI 2018

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

object affinity extraction · 0.6large pre-trained language model · 0.6instruction following · 0.4dataset construction · 0.4speaker model · 0.3parse tree · 0.3panoramic action space · 0.3neural module networks · 0.3
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2022 HOLM: Hallucinating Objects with Language Models for Referring Expression Recognition in Partially-Observed Scenes
abstract
AI systems embodied in the physical world face a fundamental challenge of partial observability; operating with only a limited view and knowledge of the environment.This creates challenges when AI systems try to reason about language and its relationship with the environment: objects referred to through language (e.g.giving many instructions) are not immediately visible.Actions by the AI system may be required to bring these objects in view.A good benchmark to study this challenge is Dynamic Referring Expression Recognition (dRER) task where the goal is to find a target location by dynamically adjusting the field of view (FoV) in a partially observed 360 • scenes.In this paper, we introduce HOLM, Hallucinating Objects with Language Models, to address the challenge of partial observability.HOLM uses large pre-trained language models (LMs) to infer object hallucinations for the unobserved part of the environment.Our core intuition is that if a pair of objects coappear in an environment frequently, our usage of language should reflect this fact about the world.Based on this intuition, we prompt language models to extract knowledge about object affinities which gives us a proxy for spatial relationships of objects.Our experiments show that HOLM performs better than the state-of-the-art approaches on two datasets for dRER; allowing to study generalization for both indoor and outdoor settings.
Volkan Cirik, Louis-Philippe Morency, Taylor Berg-Kirkpatrick
ACL (1)1
2020 Refer360$^\circ$: A Referring Expression Recognition Dataset in 360$^\circ$ Images
abstract
We propose a novel large-scale referring expression recognition dataset, Refer360°, consisting of 17,137 instruction sequences and ground-truth actions for completing these instructions in 360° scenes.Refer360° differs from existing related datasets in three ways.First, we propose a more realistic scenario where instructors and the followers have partial, yet dynamic, views of the scene -followers continuously modify their field-of-view (FoV) while interpreting instructions that specify a final target location.Second, instructions to find the target location consist of multiple steps for followers who will start at random FoVs.As a result, intermediate instructions are strongly grounded in object references and followers must identify intermediate FoVs to find the final target location correctly.Third, the target locations are neither restricted to predefined objects nor chosen by annotators; instead, they are distributed randomly across scenes.This "point anywhere" approach leads to more linguistically complex instructions, as shown in our analyses.Our examination of the dataset shows that Refer360° manifests linguistically rich phenomena in a language grounding task that poses novel challenges for computational modeling of language, vision, and navigation.
Volkan Cirik, Taylor Berg-Kirkpatrick, Louis-Philippe Morency
ACL1
2018 Using Syntax to Ground Referring Expressions in Natural Images
abstract
We introduce GroundNet, a neural network for referring expression recognition---the task of localizing (or grounding) in an image the object referred to by a natural language expression. Our approach to this task is the first to rely on a syntactic analysis of the input referring expression in order to inform the structure of the computation graph. Given a parse tree for an input expression, we explicitly map the syntactic constituents and relationships present in the tree to a composed graph of neural modules that defines our architecture for performing localization. This syntax-based approach aids localization of both the target object and auxiliary supporting objects mentioned in the expression. As a result, GroundNet is more interpretable than previous methods: we can (1) determine which phrase of the referring expression points to which object in the image and (2) track how the localization of the target object is determined by the network. We study this property empirically by introducing a new set of annotations on the GoogleRef dataset to evaluate localization of supporting objects. Our experiments show that GroundNet achieves state-of-the-art accuracy in identifying supporting objects, while maintaining comparable performance in the localization of target objects.
Volkan Cirik, Taylor Berg-Kirkpatrick, Louis-Philippe Morency
AAAI1
2018 Speaker-Follower Models for Vision-and-Language Navigation
abstract
Navigation guided by natural language instructions presents a challenging reasoning problem for instruction followers. Natural language instructions typically identify only a few high-level decisions and landmarks rather than complete low-level motor behaviors; much of the missing information must be inferred based on perceptual context. In machine learning settings, this is doubly challenging: it is difficult to collect enough annotated data to enable learning of this reasoning process from scratch, and also difficult to implement the reasoning process using generic sequence models. Here we describe an approach to vision-and-language navigation that addresses both these issues with an embedded speaker model. We use this speaker model to (1) synthesize new instructions for data augmentation and to (2) implement pragmatic reasoning, which evaluates how well candidate action sequences explain an instruction. Both steps are supported by a panoramic action space that reflects the granularity of human-generated instructions. Experiments show that all three components of this approach---speaker-driven data augmentation, pragmatic reasoning and panoramic action space---dramatically improve the performance of a baseline instruction follower, more than doubling the success rate over the best existing approach on a standard benchmark.
Daniel Fried, Ronghang Hu, Volkan Cirik, Anna Rohrbach, Jacob Andreas, Louis-Philippe Morency, Taylor Berg-Kirkpatrick, Kate Saenko, Daniel Klein 0001, Trevor Darrell
NeurIPS3
2016 Learning grammatical categories using paradigmatic representations: Substitute words for language acquisition
abstract
Learning syntactic categories is a fundamental task in language acquisition. Previous studies show that co-occurrence patterns of preceding and following words are essential to group words into categories. However, the neighboring words, or frames, are rarely repeated exactly in the data. This creates data sparsity and hampers learning for frame based models. In this work, we propose a paradigmatic representation of word context which uses probable substitutes instead of frames. Our experiments on child-directed speech show that models based on probable substitutes learn more accurate categories with fewer examples compared to models based on frames.
Mehmet Ali Yatbaz, Volkan Cirik, Aylin C. Küntay, Deniz Yuret
COLING2