Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Motoki Sano

dblp:136/8709 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
6ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 6 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
5 papers
Information extraction and text analysis · 56% Question answering and dialogue systems · 36% Knowledge representation and reasoning · 8%
Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Collaborative and social computing · 100%

Topics — the 7 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › syntactic parsing
multilingual parsing
0.712023
PRESTO: A Multilingual Dataset for Parsing Realistic Task-Oriented Dialogs · EMNLP 2023
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems
task-oriented dialogue
0.712023
PRESTO: A Multilingual Dataset for Parsing Realistic Task-Oriented Dialogs · EMNLP 2023
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › event analysis
event causality identification
0.212014
Toward Future Scenario Generation: Extracting Event Causality Exploiting Semantic Relation, Context, and Association Features · ACL (1) 2014
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems › reasoning-based question answering
why-question answering
0.212013
Why-Question Answering using Intra- and Inter-Sentential Causal Relations · ACL (1) 2013
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
relation extraction
0.112014
Toward Future Scenario Generation: Extracting Event Causality Exploiting Semantic Relation, Context, and Association Features · ACL (1) 2014
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › relation extraction › event relation extraction
causal relation extraction
0.012013
Why-Question Answering using Intra- and Inter-Sentential Causal Relations · ACL (1) 2013
Collaborative and social computing
social media
0.012013
Aid is Out There: Looking for Help from Tweets during a Large Scale Disaster · ACL (1) 2013

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

tweet analysis · 0.3supervised learning · 0.2semantic relation features · 0.2association features · 0.2supervised classification · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2023 PRESTO: A Multilingual Dataset for Parsing Realistic Task-Oriented Dialogs
abstract
Rahul Goel, Waleed Ammar, Aditya Gupta, Siddharth Vashishtha, Motoki Sano, Faiz Surani, Max Chang, HyunJeong Choe, David Greene, Chuan He, Rattima Nitisaroj, Anna Trukhina, Shachi Paul, Pararth Shah, Rushin Shah, Zhou Yu. Proceedings of the 2023 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. 2023.
Rahul Goel, Waleed Ammar, Aditya Gupta 0001, Siddharth Vashishtha, Motoki Sano, Faiz Surani, Max Chang, HyunJeong Choe, David Greene, Rattima Nitisaroj, Anna Trukhina, Shachi Paul, Pararth Shah, Rushin Shah
EMNLP5
2014 Toward Future Scenario Generation: Extracting Event Causality Exploiting Semantic Relation, Context, and Association Features
abstract
We propose a supervised method of extracting event causalities like conduct slash-and-burn agriculture→exacerbate desertification from the web using se-mantic relation (between nouns), context, and association features. Experiments show that our method outperforms base-lines that are based on state-of-the-art methods. We also propose methods of generating future scenarios like conduct slash-and-burn agriculture→exacerbate desertification→increase Asian dust (from China)→asthma gets worse. Experi-ments show that we can generate 50,000 scenarios with 68 % precision. We also generated a scenario deforestation con-tinues→global warming worsens→sea temperatures rise→vibrio parahaemolyti-cus fouls (water), which is written in no document in our input web corpus crawled in 2007. But the vibrio risk due to global warming was observed in Baker-Austin et al. (2013). Thus, we “predicted ” the future event sequence in a sense. 1
Chikara Hashimoto, Kentaro Torisawa, Julien Kloetzer, Motoki Sano, István Varga, Jong-Hoon Oh, Yutaka Kidawara
ACL (1)4
2014 Million-scale Derivation of Semantic Relations from a Manually Constructed Predicate Taxonomy
Motoki Sano, Kentaro Torisawa, Julien Kloetzer, Chikara Hashimoto, István Varga, Jong-Hoon Oh
COLING1
2013 Why-Question Answering using Intra- and Inter-Sentential Causal Relations
Jong-Hoon Oh, Kentaro Torisawa, Chikara Hashimoto, Motoki Sano, Stijn De Saeger, Kiyonori Ohtake
ACL (1)4
2013 Aid is Out There: Looking for Help from Tweets during a Large Scale Disaster
István Varga, Motoki Sano, Kentaro Torisawa, Chikara Hashimoto, Kiyonori Ohtake, Takao Kawai, Jong-Hoon Oh, Stijn De Saeger
ACL (1)2
2013 Two-Stage Method for Large-Scale Acquisition of Contradiction Pattern Pairs using Entailment
abstract
Julien Kloetzer, Stijn De Saeger, Kentaro Torisawa, Chikara Hashimoto, Jong-Hoon Oh, Motoki Sano, Kiyonori Ohtake. Proceedings of the 2013 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. 2013.
Julien Kloetzer, Stijn De Saeger, Kentaro Torisawa, Chikara Hashimoto, Jong-Hoon Oh, Motoki Sano, Kiyonori Ohtake
EMNLP6