Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Michael Barton Laws

dblp:136/9071 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2014
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Information extraction and text analysis · 48% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 28% Generative modeling · 24%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Medical and health informatics · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Generative modeling
generative model
0.212013
A Generative Joint, Additive, Sequential Model of Topics and Speech Acts in Patient-Doctor Communication · EMNLP 2013
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › dialogue analysis
speech act recognition
0.212013
A Generative Joint, Additive, Sequential Model of Topics and Speech Acts in Patient-Doctor Communication · EMNLP 2013
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
topic model
0.212013
A Generative Joint, Additive, Sequential Model of Topics and Speech Acts in Patient-Doctor Communication · EMNLP 2013

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

log-linear model · 0.5clustering · 0.4joint modeling · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2014 Identifying Differences in Physician Communication Styles with a Log-Linear Transition Component Model
abstract
We consider the task of grouping doctors with respect to communication patterns exhibited in outpatient visits. We propose a novel approach toward this end in which we model speech act transitions in conversations via a log-linear model incorporating physician specific components. We train this model over transcripts of outpatient visits annotated with speech act codes and then cluster physicians in (a transformation of) this parameter space. We find significant correlations between the induced groupings and patient survey response data comprising ratings of physician communication. Furthermore, the novel sequential component model we leverage to induce this clustering allows us to explore differences across these groups. This work demonstrates how statistical AI might be used to better understand (and ultimately improve) physician communication.
Byron C. Wallace, Issa J. Dahabreh, Thomas A. Trikalinos, Michael Barton Laws, Ira B. Wilson, Eugene Charniak
AAAI4
2013 A Generative Joint, Additive, Sequential Model of Topics and Speech Acts in Patient-Doctor Communication
abstract
We develop a novel generative model of conversation that jointly captures both the topical content and the speech act type associated with each utterance.Our model expresses both token emission and state transition probabilities as log-linear functions of separate components corresponding to topics and speech acts (and their interactions).We apply this model to a dataset comprising annotated patient-physician visits and show that the proposed joint approach outperforms a baseline univariate model.
Byron C. Wallace, Thomas A. Trikalinos, Michael Barton Laws, Ira B. Wilson, Eugene Charniak
EMNLP3