Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Shweta Ghonge

dblp:136/9209 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2013
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Information extraction and text analysis · 100%

Topics — the 1 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
pointwise mutual information
0.212013
Appropriately Incorporating Statistical Significance in PMI · EMNLP 2013

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

statistical significance testing · 0.2PMI variants · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2013 Appropriately Incorporating Statistical Significance in PMI
abstract
Two recent measures incorporate the notion of statistical significance in basic PMI formulation.In some tasks, we find that the new measures perform worse than the PMI.Our analysis shows that while the basic ideas in incorporating statistical significance in PMI are reasonable, they have been applied slightly inappropriately.By fixing this, we get new measures that improve performance over not just PMI but on other popular co-occurrence measures as well.In fact, the revised measures perform reasonably well compared with more resource intensive non co-occurrence based methods also.
Om P. Damani, Shweta Ghonge
EMNLP2