Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Mathias Berglund
dblp:136/9318
· DBLP profile ↗
8ranked-venue papers
4as first author
0since 2021 · last 2019
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 8 · 4 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
5 papers |
Deep learning architectures and training · 34% Optimization for machine learning · 13% Reinforcement learning · 13% |
Topics — the 14 heaviest of 15, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
regularization |
0.6 | 2 | 2019 | Regularizing Trajectory Optimization with Denoising Autoencoders · NeurIPS 2019 Scalable Gradient-Based Tuning of Continuous Regularization Hyperparameters · ICML 2016 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
model-based reinforcement learning |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Regularizing Trajectory Optimization with Denoising Autoencoders · NeurIPS 2019 |
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
trajectory optimization |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Regularizing Trajectory Optimization with Denoising Autoencoders · NeurIPS 2019 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › hyperparameter optimization
gradient-based hyperparameter optimization |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Scalable Gradient-Based Tuning of Continuous Regularization Hyperparameters · ICML 2016 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
hyperparameter optimization |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Scalable Gradient-Based Tuning of Continuous Regularization Hyperparameters · ICML 2016 |
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding
perceptual grouping |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Tagger: Deep Unsupervised Perceptual Grouping · NIPS 2016 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
autoregressive model |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | Bidirectional Recurrent Neural Networks as Generative Models · NIPS 2015 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › recurrent neural network
bidirectional recurrent network |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | Bidirectional Recurrent Neural Networks as Generative Models · NIPS 2015 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › feedforward neural network
ladder networks |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | Semi-supervised Learning with Ladder Networks · NIPS 2015 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
recurrent neural network |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | Bidirectional Recurrent Neural Networks as Generative Models · NIPS 2015 |
Machine learning › Learning paradigms
semi-supervised learning |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | Semi-supervised Learning with Ladder Networks · NIPS 2015 |
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot control › actuator control
motor control |
0.1 | 1 | 2019 | Regularizing Trajectory Optimization with Denoising Autoencoders · NeurIPS 2019 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
sample efficiency |
0.1 | 1 | 2019 | Regularizing Trajectory Optimization with Denoising Autoencoders · NeurIPS 2019 |
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
image classification |
0.1 | 1 | 2015 | Semi-supervised Learning with Ladder Networks · NIPS 2015 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
gradient-free optimization · 0.4gradient-based optimization · 0.4denoising autoencoder · 0.4validation · 0.2iterative inference · 0.2gradient-based tuning · 0.2amortized inference · 0.2neural autoregressive distribution estimation · 0.2generative stochastic network · 0.2bayesian inference · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | Regularizing Trajectory Optimization with Denoising AutoencodersabstractTrajectory optimization using a learned model of the environment is one of the core elements of model-based reinforcement learning. This procedure often suffers from exploiting inaccuracies of the learned model. We propose to regularize trajectory optimization by means of a denoising autoencoder that is trained on the same trajectories as the model of the environment. We show that the proposed regularization leads to improved planning with both gradient-based and gradient-free optimizers. We also demonstrate that using regularized trajectory optimization leads to rapid initial learning in a set of popular motor control tasks, which suggests that the proposed approach can be a useful tool for improving sample efficiency. Rinu Boney, Norman Di Palo, Mathias Berglund, Alexander Ilin, Juho Kannala, Antti Rasmus, Harri Valpola |
NeurIPS | 3 |
| 2016 | Stochastic gradient estimate variance in contrastive divergence and persistent contrastive divergence
Mathias Berglund |
ESANN | 1 |
| 2016 | Scalable Gradient-Based Tuning of Continuous Regularization HyperparametersabstractHyperparameter selection generally relies on running multiple full training trials, with selection based on validation set performance. We propose a gradient-based approach for locally adjusting hyperparameters during training of the model. Hyperparameters are adjusted so as to make the model parameter gradients, and hence updates, more advantageous for the validation cost. We explore the approach for tuning regularization hyperparameters and find that in experiments on MNIST, SVHN and CIFAR-10, the resulting regularization levels are within the optimal regions. The additional computational cost depends on how frequently the hyperparameters are trained, but the tested scheme adds only 30% computational overhead regardless of the model size. Since the method is significantly less computationally demanding compared to similar gradient-based approaches to hyperparameter optimization, and consistently finds good hyperparameter values, it can be a useful tool for training neural network models. Jelena Luketina, Tapani Raiko, Mathias Berglund, Klaus Greff |
ICML | 3 |
| 2016 | Tagger: Deep Unsupervised Perceptual GroupingabstractWe present a framework for efficient perceptual inference that explicitly reasons about the segmentation of its inputs and features. Rather than being trained for any specific segmentation, our framework learns the grouping process in an unsupervised manner or alongside any supervised task. We enable a neural network to group the representations of different objects in an iterative manner through a differentiable mechanism. We achieve very fast convergence by allowing the system to amortize the joint iterative inference of the groupings and their representations. In contrast to many other recently proposed methods for addressing multi-object scenes, our system does not assume the inputs to be images and can therefore directly handle other modalities. We evaluate our method on multi-digit classification of very cluttered images that require texture segmentation. Remarkably our method achieves improved classification performance over convolutional networks despite being fully connected, by making use of the grouping mechanism. Furthermore, we observe that our system greatly improves upon the semi-supervised result of a baseline Ladder network on our dataset. These results are evidence that grouping is a powerful tool that can help to improve sample efficiency. Klaus Greff, Antti Rasmus, Mathias Berglund, Tele Hao, Harri Valpola, Jürgen Schmidhuber |
NIPS | 3 |
| 2015 | Bidirectional Recurrent Neural Networks as Generative ModelsabstractBidirectional recurrent neural networks (RNN) are trained to predict both in the positive and negative time directions simultaneously. They have not been used commonly in unsupervised tasks, because a probabilistic interpretation of the model has been difficult. Recently, two different frameworks, GSN and NADE, provide a connection between reconstruction and probabilistic modeling, which makes the interpretation possible. As far as we know, neither GSN or NADE have been studied in the context of time series before.As an example of an unsupervised task, we study the problem of filling in gaps in high-dimensional time series with complex dynamics. Although unidirectional RNNs have recently been trained successfully to model such time series, inference in the negative time direction is non-trivial. We propose two probabilistic interpretations of bidirectional RNNs that can be used to reconstruct missing gaps efficiently. Our experiments on text data show that both proposed methods are much more accurate than unidirectional reconstructions, although a bit less accurate than a computationally complex bidirectional Bayesian inference on the unidirectional RNN. We also provide results on music data for which the Bayesian inference is computationally infeasible, demonstrating the scalability of the proposed methods. Mathias Berglund, Tapani Raiko, Mikko Honkala, Leo Kärkkäinen, Akos Vetek, Juha Karhunen |
NIPS | 1 |
| 2015 | Semi-supervised Learning with Ladder NetworksabstractWe combine supervised learning with unsupervised learning in deep neural networks. The proposed model is trained to simultaneously minimize the sum of supervised and unsupervised cost functions by backpropagation, avoiding the need for layer-wise pre-training. Our work builds on top of the Ladder network proposed by Valpola (2015) which we extend by combining the model with supervision. We show that the resulting model reaches state-of-the-art performance in semi-supervised MNIST and CIFAR-10 classification in addition to permutation-invariant MNIST classification with all labels. Antti Rasmus, Mathias Berglund, Mikko Honkala, Harri Valpola, Tapani Raiko |
NIPS | 2 |
| 2015 | Measuring the usefulness of hidden units in Boltzmann machines with mutual information
Mathias Berglund, Tapani Raiko, Kyunghyun Cho |
Neural Networks | 1 |
| 2013 | Measuring the Usefulness of Hidden Units in Boltzmann Machines with Mutual Information
Mathias Berglund, Tapani Raiko, Kyunghyun Cho |
ICONIP (1) | 1 |