Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Marzieh Saeidi
dblp:136/9320
· DBLP profile ↗
9ranked-venue papers
4as first author
5since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 8 · 4 first-author · 4 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
7 papers |
Question answering and dialogue systems · 40% Information extraction and text analysis · 39% Transfer learning and domain adaptation · 12% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
2 papers |
Machine learning and data management · 59% Information retrieval · 23% Query processing and optimization · 18% |
Topics — the 9 heaviest of 13, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › fact-checking
automated fact-checking |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Automated Fact-Checking in Dialogue: Are Specialized Models Needed? · EMNLP 2023 |
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
few-shot learning |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Prompt-free and Efficient Few-shot Learning with Language Models · ACL (1) 2022 |
Machine learning and data management › learned database components
neural database |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | From Natural Language Processing to Neural Databases · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2021 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
fact-checking |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Generating Fact Checking Briefs · EMNLP (1) 2020 |
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems › machine reading comprehension
conversational machine reading |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Interpretation of Natural Language Rules in Conversational Machine Reading · EMNLP 2018 |
Information retrieval › interactive information retrieval
adaptive retrieval |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | Automated Fact-Checking in Dialogue: Are Specialized Models Needed? · EMNLP 2023 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › natural language reasoning
textual reasoning |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | Database reasoning over text · ACL/IJCNLP (1) 2021 |
Query processing and optimization › SQL query processing
select-project-join query |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | From Natural Language Processing to Neural Databases · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2021 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
text generation |
0.1 | 1 | 2020 | Generating Fact Checking Briefs · EMNLP (1) 2020 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
retrieval adaptation · 1.3fine-tuning · 1.3conversational input transformation · 1.3transformer · 1.0natural language processing · 1.0language model · 0.6question decomposition · 0.5pretrained question answering models · 0.5expression trees · 0.5textual entailment · 0.3
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Automated Fact-Checking in Dialogue: Are Specialized Models Needed?abstractPrior research has shown that typical factchecking models for stand-alone claims struggle with claims made in dialogues.As a solution, fine-tuning these models on labelled dialogue data has been proposed.However, creating separate models for each use case is impractical, and we show that fine-tuning models for dialogue results in poor performance on typical fact-checking.To overcome this challenge, we present techniques that allow us to use the same models for both dialogue and typical fact-checking.These mainly focus on retrieval adaptation and transforming conversational inputs so that they can be accurately predicted by models trained on stand-alone claims.We demonstrate that a typical fact-checking model incorporating these techniques is competitive with state-of-the-art models fine-tuned for dialogue, while maintaining its accuracy on stand-alone claims. Eric Chamoun, Marzieh Saeidi, Andreas Vlachos 0001 |
EMNLP | 2 |
| 2022 | Prompt-free and Efficient Few-shot Learning with Language ModelsabstractRabeeh Karimi Mahabadi, Luke Zettlemoyer, James Henderson, Lambert Mathias, Marzieh Saeidi, Veselin Stoyanov, Majid Yazdani. Proceedings of the 60th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2022. Rabeeh Karimi Mahabadi, Luke Zettlemoyer, James Henderson 0001, Lambert Mathias, Marzieh Saeidi, Veselin Stoyanov, Majid Yazdani |
ACL (1) | 5 |
| 2021 | Database reasoning over textabstractJames Thorne, Majid Yazdani, Marzieh Saeidi, Fabrizio Silvestri, Sebastian Riedel, Alon Halevy. Proceedings of the 59th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 11th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2021. James Thorne, Majid Yazdani, Marzieh Saeidi, Fabrizio Silvestri, Sebastian Riedel 0001, Alon Y. Halevy |
ACL/IJCNLP (1) | 3 |
| 2021 | Cross-Policy Compliance Detection via Question AnsweringabstractPolicy compliance detection is the task of ensuring that a scenario conforms to a policy (e.g. a claim is valid according to government rules or a post in an online platform conforms to community guidelines).This task has been previously instantiated as a form of textual entailment, which results in poor accuracy due to the complexity of the policies.In this paper we propose to address policy compliance detection via decomposing it into question answering, where questions check whether the conditions stated in the policy apply to the scenario, and an expression tree combines the answers to obtain the label.Despite the initial upfront annotation cost, we demonstrate that this approach results in better accuracy, especially in the cross-policy setup where the policies during testing are unseen in training.In addition, it allows us to use existing question answering models pre-trained on existing large datasets.Finally, it explicitly identifies the information missing from a scenario in case policy compliance cannot be determined.We conduct our experiments using a recent dataset consisting of government policies, which we augment with expert annotations and find that the cost of annotating question answering decomposition is largely offset by improved interannotator agreement and speed. Marzieh Saeidi, Majid Yazdani, Andreas Vlachos 0001 |
EMNLP (1) | 1 |
| 2021 | From Natural Language Processing to Neural DatabasesabstractIn recent years, neural networks have shown impressive performance gains on long-standing AI problems, such as answering queries from text and machine translation. These advances raise the question of whether neural nets can be used at the core of query processing to derive answers from facts, even when the facts are expressed in natural language. If so, it is conceivable that we could relax the fundamental assumption of database management, namely, that our data is represented as fields of a pre-defined schema. Furthermore, such technology would enable combining information from text, images, and structured data seamlessly. This paper introduces neural databases , a class of systems that use NLP transformers as localized answer derivation engines. We ground the vision in NeuralDB, a system for querying facts represented as short natural language sentences. We demonstrate that recent natural language processing models, specifically transformers, can answer select-project-join queries if they are given a set of relevant facts. However, they cannot scale to non-trivial databases nor answer set-based and aggregation queries. Based on these insights, we identify specific research challenges that are needed to build neural databases. Some of the challenges require drawing upon the rich literature in data management, and others pose new research opportunities to the NLP community. Finally, we show that with preliminary solutions, NeuralDB can already answer queries over thousands of sentences with very high accuracy. James Thorne, Majid Yazdani, Marzieh Saeidi, Fabrizio Silvestri, Sebastian Riedel 0001, Alon Y. Halevy |
Proc. VLDB Endow. | 3 |
| 2020 | Generating Fact Checking BriefsabstractAngela Fan, Aleksandra Piktus, Fabio Petroni, Guillaume Wenzek, Marzieh Saeidi, Andreas Vlachos, Antoine Bordes, Sebastian Riedel. Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP). 2020. Angela Fan, Aleksandra Piktus, Fabio Petroni, Guillaume Wenzek, Marzieh Saeidi, Andreas Vlachos 0001, Antoine Bordes, Sebastian Riedel 0001 |
EMNLP (1) | 5 |
| 2018 | Interpretation of Natural Language Rules in Conversational Machine ReadingabstractMarzieh Saeidi, Max Bartolo, Patrick Lewis, Sameer Singh, Tim Rocktäschel, Mike Sheldon, Guillaume Bouchard, Sebastian Riedel. Proceedings of the 2018 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. 2018. Marzieh Saeidi, Max Bartolo, Patrick S. H. Lewis, Sameer Singh 0001, Tim Rocktäschel, Mike Sheldon, Guillaume Bouchard, Sebastian Riedel 0001 |
EMNLP | 1 |
| 2016 | SentiHood: Targeted Aspect Based Sentiment Analysis Dataset for Urban NeighbourhoodsabstractIn this paper, we introduce the task of targeted aspect-based sentiment analysis. The goal is to extract fine-grained information with respect to entities mentioned in user comments. This work extends both aspect-based sentiment analysis – that assumes a single entity per document — and targeted sentiment analysis — that assumes a single sentiment towards a target entity. In particular, we identify the sentiment towards each aspect of one or more entities. As a testbed for this task, we introduce the SentiHood dataset, extracted from a question answering (QA) platform where urban neighbourhoods are discussed by users. In this context units of text often mention several aspects of one or more neighbourhoods. This is the first time that a generic social media platform,i.e. QA, is used for fine-grained opinion mining. Text coming from QA platforms are far less constrained compared to text from review specific platforms which current datasets are based on. We develop several strong baselines, relying on logistic regression and state-of-the-art recurrent neural networks Marzieh Saeidi, Guillaume Bouchard, Maria Liakata, Sebastian Riedel 0001 |
COLING | 1 |
| 2013 | A Novel Application of Particle Swarm Optimisation to Optimal Trade Execution
Marzieh Saeidi, Denise Gorse |
ICONIP (2) | 1 |