Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Konstantine Tsotsos

dblp:136/9495 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
7ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2022
0009-0008-2366-4666ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 4 · 1 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 2 · 1 first-authorHuman-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
5 papers
Robot navigation and mapping · 58% 3D vision · 26% Deep learning architectures and training · 16%
Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Immersive interaction · 50% Interaction techniques and input · 50%
Computer graphics and multimedia
2 papers
Virtual and augmented reality · 100%

Topics — the 16 heaviest of 16, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computer vision › 3D vision › depth estimation
monocular depth estimation
0.922022
Learned Monocular Depth Priors in Visual-Inertial Initialization · ECCV (22) 2022
Depth from motion for smartphone AR · ACM Trans. Graph. 2018
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping › visual odometry
visual-inertial odometry
0.612022
Learned Monocular Depth Priors in Visual-Inertial Initialization · ECCV (22) 2022
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
weight initialization
0.612022
Learned Monocular Depth Priors in Visual-Inertial Initialization · ECCV (22) 2022
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping › localization
visual-inertial navigation
0.522016
Observability, Identifiability and Sensitivity of Vision-Aided Inertial Navigation · IJCAI 2016
Observability, identifiability and sensitivity of vision-aided inertial navigation · ICRA 2015
Virtual and augmented reality › augmented reality
mobile augmented reality
0.522020
Depth from motion for smartphone AR · ACM Trans. Graph. 2018
DepthLab: Real-time 3D Interaction with Depth Maps for Mobile Augmented Reality · UIST 2020
Immersive interaction
augmented reality interaction
0.412020
DepthLab: Real-time 3D Interaction with Depth Maps for Mobile Augmented Reality · UIST 2020
Interaction techniques and input › sensor-based interaction
depth camera-based interaction
0.412020
DepthLab: Real-time 3D Interaction with Depth Maps for Mobile Augmented Reality · UIST 2020
Virtual and augmented reality › tracking
6DOF tracking
0.312018
Depth from motion for smartphone AR · ACM Trans. Graph. 2018
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping › SLAM
loop closure detection
0.212016
A Simple Hierarchical Pooling Data Structure for Loop Closure · ECCV (3) 2016
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping
SLAM
0.212016
A Simple Hierarchical Pooling Data Structure for Loop Closure · ECCV (3) 2016
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping
localization
0.212015
Observability, identifiability and sensitivity of vision-aided inertial navigation · ICRA 2015
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping › state estimation
observability analysis
0.212015
Observability, identifiability and sensitivity of vision-aided inertial navigation · ICRA 2015
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping
state estimation
0.112016
Observability, Identifiability and Sensitivity of Vision-Aided Inertial Navigation · IJCAI 2016
Algorithms and data structures › data structure design
hierarchical data structures
0.112016
A Simple Hierarchical Pooling Data Structure for Loop Closure · ECCV (3) 2016
Computer vision › 3D vision
pose estimation
0.112015
Observability, identifiability and sensitivity of vision-aided inertial navigation · ICRA 2015
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping
sensor fusion
0.112015
Observability, identifiability and sensitivity of vision-aided inertial navigation · ICRA 2015

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

physics-based collision · 0.9geometry-aware rendering · 0.9depth map processing · 0.9visual-inertial odometry · 0.7monocular depth computation · 0.7loop closure · 0.5hierarchical pooling · 0.5sensitivity analysis · 0.2identifiability analysis · 0.2filtering · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2022 Learned Monocular Depth Priors in Visual-Inertial Initialization
Yunwen Zhou, Abhishek Kar, Eric Turner 0001, Adarsh Kowdle, Chao X. Guo, Ryan DuToit, Konstantine Tsotsos
ECCV (22)7
2020 DepthLab: Real-time 3D Interaction with Depth Maps for Mobile Augmented Reality
abstract
Mobile devices with passive depth sensing capabilities are ubiquitous, and recently active depth sensors have become available on some tablets and AR/VR devices. Although real-time depth data is accessible, its rich value to mainstream AR applications has been sorely under-explored. Adoption of depth-based UX has been impeded by the complexity of performing even simple operations with raw depth data, such as detecting intersections or constructing meshes. In this paper, we introduce DepthLab, a software library that encapsulates a variety of depth-based UI/UX paradigms, including geometry-aware rendering (occlusion, shadows), surface interaction behaviors (physics-based collisions, avatar path planning), and visual effects (relighting, 3D-anchored focus and aperture effects). We break down the usage of depth into localized depth, surface depth, and dense depth, and describe our real-time algorithms for interaction and rendering tasks. We present the design process, system, and components of DepthLab to streamline and centralize the development of interactive depth features. We have open-sourced our software at https://github.com/googlesamples/arcore-depth-lab to external developers, conducted performance evaluation, and discussed how DepthLab can accelerate the workflow of mobile AR designers and developers. With DepthLab we aim to help mobile developers to effortlessly integrate depth into their AR experiences and amplify the expression of their creative vision.
Ruofei Du, Eric Turner 0001, Maksym Dzitsiuk, Luca Prasso, Ivo Duarte, Jason Dourgarian, João Afonso, Jose Pascoal, Josh Gladstone, Nuno Cruces, Shahram Izadi, Adarsh Kowdle, Konstantine Tsotsos, David Kim 0002
UIST13
2018 Depth from motion for smartphone AR
abstract
Augmented reality (AR) for smartphones has matured from a technology for earlier adopters, available only on select high-end phones, to one that is truly available to the general public. One of the key breakthroughs has been in low-compute methods for six degree of freedom (6DoF) tracking on phones using only the existing hardware (camera and inertial sensors). 6DoF tracking is the cornerstone of smartphone AR allowing virtual content to be precisely locked on top of the real world. However, to really give users the impression of believable AR, one requires mobile depth. Without depth, even simple effects such as a virtual object being correctly occluded by the real-world is impossible. However, requiring a mobile depth sensor would severely restrict the access to such features. In this article, we provide a novel pipeline for mobile depth that supports a wide array of mobile phones, and uses only the existing monocular color sensor. Through several technical contributions, we provide the ability to compute low latency dense depth maps using only a single CPU core of a wide range of (medium-high) mobile phones. We demonstrate the capabilities of our approach on high-level AR applications including real-time navigation and shopping.
Julien P. C. Valentin, Adarsh Kowdle, Jonathan T. Barron, Neal Wadhwa, Maksym Dzitsiuk, Michael Schoenberg, Ambrus Csaszar, Eric Turner 0001, Ivan Dryanovski, João Afonso, Jose Pascoal, Konstantine Tsotsos, Mira Leung, Mirko Schmidt, Onur G. Guleryuz, Sameh Khamis, Vladimir Tankovich, Sean Ryan Fanello, Shahram Izadi, Christoph Rhemann
ACM Trans. Graph.13
2016 A Simple Hierarchical Pooling Data Structure for Loop Closure
Xiaohan Fei, Konstantine Tsotsos, Stefano Soatto
ECCV (3)2
2016 Observability, Identifiability and Sensitivity of Vision-Aided Inertial Navigation
Joshua Hernandez, Konstantine Tsotsos, Stefano Soatto
IJCAI2
2015 Observability, identifiability and sensitivity of vision-aided inertial navigation
abstract
We analyze the observability of 3-D pose from the fusion of visual and inertial sensors. Because the model contains unknown parameters, such as sensor biases, the problem is usually cast as a mixed filtering/identification, with the resulting observability analysis providing necessary conditions for convergence to a unique point estimate. Most models treat sensor bias rates as “noise,” independent of other states, including biases themselves, an assumption that is patently violated in practice. We show that, when this assumption is lifted, the resulting model is not observable, and therefore existing analyses cannot be used to conclude that the set of states that are indistinguishable from the measurements is a singleton. In other words, the resulting model is not observable. We therefore re-cast the analysis as one of sensitivity: Rather than attempting to prove that the set of indistinguishable trajectories is a singleton, we derive bounds on its volume, as a function of characteristics of the sensor and other sufficient excitation conditions. This provides an explicit characterization of the indistinguishable set that can be used for analysis and validation purposes.
Joshua Hernandez, Konstantine Tsotsos, Stefano Soatto
ICRA2
2015 Robust inference for visual-inertial sensor fusion
abstract
Inference of three-dimensional motion from the fusion of inertial and visual sensory data has to contend with the preponderance of outliers in the latter. Robust filtering deals with the joint inference and classification task of selecting which data fits the model, and estimating its state. We derive the optimal discriminant and propose several approximations, some used in the literature, others new. We compare them analytically, by pointing to the assumptions underlying their approximations, and empirically. We show that the best performing method improves the performance of state-of-the-art visual-inertial sensor fusion systems, while retaining the same computational complexity.
Konstantine Tsotsos, Alessandro Chiuso, Stefano Soatto
ICRA1