Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Gaurav Menghani

dblp:137/0537 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
1as first author
4since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 1 first-author · 4 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
4 papers
Efficient and distributed learning · 51% Trustworthy machine learning · 16% Learning theory · 15%

Topics — the 10 heaviest of 12, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model compression
knowledge distillation
1.932023
SLaM: Student-Label Mixing for Distillation with Unlabeled Examples · NeurIPS 2023
Robust Active Distillation · ICLR 2023
Weighted Distillation with Unlabeled Examples · NeurIPS 2022
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
model compression
0.912025
LAuReL: Learned Augmented Residual Layer · ICML 2025
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › parameter-efficient learning
parameter-efficient architecture
0.912025
LAuReL: Learned Augmented Residual Layer · ICML 2025
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › skip connections
residual connection
0.912025
LAuReL: Learned Augmented Residual Layer · ICML 2025
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
learning with noisy labels
0.712023
SLaM: Student-Label Mixing for Distillation with Unlabeled Examples · NeurIPS 2023
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model compression › knowledge distillation
robust distillation
0.712023
Robust Active Distillation · ICLR 2023
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
robustness
0.712023
Robust Active Distillation · ICLR 2023
Machine learning › Learning theory
sample complexity
0.712023
SLaM: Student-Label Mixing for Distillation with Unlabeled Examples · NeurIPS 2023
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
large language model
0.312025
LAuReL: Learned Augmented Residual Layer · ICML 2025
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
teacher-student framework
0.212023
SLaM: Student-Label Mixing for Distillation with Unlabeled Examples · NeurIPS 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

transformer · 0.9residual connections · 0.9student-label mixing · 0.7knowledge distillation · 0.7forward loss-adjustment · 0.7active learning · 0.7importance weighting · 0.6debiasing reweighting · 0.6
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 LAuReL: Learned Augmented Residual Layer
abstract
One of the core pillars of efficient deep learning methods are architectural improvements, such as residual/skip connections, which have led to significantly better model convergence and quality. Since their introduction, residual connections have become ubiquitous not only in convolutional neural networks but also in transformer-based architectures, the backbone of LLMs. In this paper, we introduce the Learned Augmented Residual Layer (LAuReL) — a novel generalization of the canonical residual connection — designed to serve as an in-situ replacement while outperforming it in both model quality and footprint metrics. Our experiments show that LAuReL can enhance quality for both vision and language models while adding fewer parameters and incurring less latency and memory overhead than naively increasing parameter count. For example, on the ImageNet-1K task, LAuReL achieves the same model quality improvements as naively adding an extra layer while using $2.6 \times$ fewer parameters. Similarly, when pre-training 1B and 4B parameter LLMs, LAuReL improves performance on a variety of challenging downstream evaluation tasks by 2.54% to 20.05%, while adding only 0.012% and 0.1% additional parameters, respectively.
Gaurav Menghani, Sanjiv Kumar
ICML1
2023 Robust Active Distillation
Cenk Baykal, Khoa Trinh, Fotis Iliopoulos, Gaurav Menghani, Erik Vee
ICLR4
2023 SLaM: Student-Label Mixing for Distillation with Unlabeled Examples
abstract
Knowledge distillation with unlabeled examples is a powerful training paradigm for generating compact and lightweight student models in applications where the amount of labeled data is limited but one has access to a large pool of unlabeled data. In this setting, a large teacher model generates "soft" pseudo-labels for the unlabeled dataset which are then used for training the student model. Despite its success in a wide variety of applications, a shortcoming of this approach is that the teacher's pseudo-labels are often noisy, leading to impaired student performance. In this paper, we present a principled method for knowledge distillation with unlabeled examples that we call Student-Label Mixing (SLaM) and we show that it consistently improves over prior approaches by evaluating it on several standard benchmarks. Finally, we show that SLaM comes with theoretical guarantees; along the way we give an algorithm improving the best-known sample complexity for learning halfspaces with margin under random classification noise, and provide the first convergence analysis for so-called ``forward loss-adjustment" methods.
Vasilis Kontonis, Fotis Iliopoulos, Khoa Trinh, Cenk Baykal, Gaurav Menghani, Erik Vee
NeurIPS5
2022 Weighted Distillation with Unlabeled Examples
abstract
Distillation with unlabeled examples is a popular and powerful method for training deep neural networks in settings where the amount of labeled data is limited: A large “teacher” neural network is trained on the labeled data available, and then it is used to generate labels on an unlabeled dataset (typically much larger in size). These labels are then utilized to train the smaller “student” model which will actually be deployed. Naturally, the success of the approach depends on the quality of the teacher’s labels, since the student could be confused if trained on inaccurate data. This paper proposes a principled approach for addressing this issue based on a “debiasing" reweighting of the student’s loss function tailored to the distillation training paradigm. Our method is hyper-parameter free, data-agnostic, and simple to implement. We demonstrate significant improvements on popular academic datasets and we accompany our results with a theoretical analysis which rigorously justifies the performance of our method in certain settings.
Fotis Iliopoulos, Vasilis Kontonis, Cenk Baykal, Gaurav Menghani, Khoa Trinh, Erik Vee
NeurIPS4