Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.

Amir Hossein Hajizadeh

dblp:137/2112 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2013
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper
Visualization and visual analytics · 100%
Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Collaborative and social computing · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Visualization and visual analytics › multi-view visualization › coordinated multiple views
brushing and linking
0.212013
Supporting Awareness through Collaborative Brushing and Linking of Tabular Data · IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 2013
Visualization and visual analytics
collaborative visualization
0.212013
Supporting Awareness through Collaborative Brushing and Linking of Tabular Data · IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 2013
Collaborative and social computing › computer-supported cooperative work
distributed collaboration
0.012013
Supporting Awareness through Collaborative Brushing and Linking of Tabular Data · IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 2013

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

controlled user study · 0.3
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2013 Supporting Awareness through Collaborative Brushing and Linking of Tabular Data
abstract
Maintaining an awareness of collaborators' actions is critical during collaborative work, including during collaborative visualization activities. Particularly when collaborators are located at a distance, it is important to know what everyone is working on in order to avoid duplication of effort, share relevant results in a timely manner and build upon each other's results. Can a person's brushing actions provide an indication of their queries and interests in a data set? Can these actions be revealed to a collaborator without substantially disrupting their own independent work? We designed a study to answer these questions in the context of distributed collaborative visualization of tabular data. Participants in our study worked independently to answer questions about a tabular data set, while simultaneously viewing brushing actions of a fictitious collaborator, shown directly within a shared workspace. We compared three methods of presenting the collaborator's actions: brushing & linking (i.e. highlighting exactly what the collaborator would see), selection (i.e. showing only a selected item), and persistent selection (i.e. showing only selected items but having them persist for some time). Our results demonstrated that persistent selection enabled some awareness of the collaborator's activities while causing minimal interference with independent work. Other techniques were less effective at providing awareness, and brushing & linking caused substantial interference. These findings suggest promise for the idea of exploiting natural brushing actions to provide awareness in collaborative work.
Amir Hossein Hajizadeh, Melanie Tory, Rock Leung
IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph.1