Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Ahmad Hariri

dblp:137/3248 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2021
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2 · 2 since 2021Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 100%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Medical and health informatics · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models
graphical models
0.212013
Exploring the Mind: Integrating Questionnaires and fMRI · ICML (2) 2013
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models › graphical models › graphical model estimation
sparse graphical models
0.212013
Exploring the Mind: Integrating Questionnaires and fMRI · ICML (2) 2013
Medical and health informatics › neuroimaging › neuroimaging analysis
fMRI analysis
0.212013
Exploring the Mind: Integrating Questionnaires and fMRI · ICML (2) 2013
Medical and health informatics › neuroimaging
neuroimaging analysis
0.212013
Exploring the Mind: Integrating Questionnaires and fMRI · ICML (2) 2013

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

von mises distribution · 0.3matrix factorization · 0.3latent binary features · 0.3bayesian modeling · 0.3
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2021 Multi-Armed Bandit Based Feature Selection
abstract
Effective feature selection can help reduce dimensionality, improve prediction accuracy, and increase result comprehensibility. Classic feature selection methods typically select and test feature subset in multiple iterations, and thus can be regarded as an exploratory process. In recent literature, the multi-armed bandit has become an emerging method to automate exploration for searching optimal solutions in large spaces. In this paper, our research question is: Can the multi-armed bandit formulation help us to automate feature selection? Along this line, we reformulate the feature selection problem with the combinatorial multi-armed bandit (CMAB) framework by regarding each feature as an arm. We propose two novel oracles and investigate how the super arm is formed under different oracles, and how the coordination between various features can be improved by a novel reward scheme. We present extensive experimental results to demonstrate the improved performance of the proposed methods over conventional feature selection approaches.
Kunpeng Liu 0001, Wei Zhang 0076, Ahmad Hariri, Yanjie Fu, Kien A. Hua
SDM4
2021 AutoGFS: Automated Group-based Feature Selection via Interactive Reinforcement Learning
abstract
Feature selection is a fundamental component of data mining, aiming to select optimal feature subsets for downstream task.Recently, an emerging feature selection method called reinforced feature selection applies reinforcement learning into feature selection.Reinforced Feature Selection (RFS) automates feature selection process and can effectively find the optimal subset.Generally, RFS can be categorized into single-agent RFS and multi-agent RFS.Single-agent RFS uses one reinforcement learning agent to select features, but its action space is exponentially-increasing with feature number and can merely obtain local optima.Multi-agent RFS uses multiple agents to select features; this method can achieve global optima, but it needs to optimize as many policy networks as feature number which costs huge computational resources and thus becomes computationally inefficient.This dilemma naturally leads to a research question: How can we synthesize the advantages of single-agent RFS and multi-agent RFS while avoiding their disadvantages?To answer this question, we propose a Group-based Interactive Reinforced Feature Selection (GIRFS) framework.This framework balances single-agent RFS and multi-agent RFS for better feature selection.Specifically, we formulate the feature selection problem into a group-based RFS problem.In this formulation, we first assign the given features into several groups based on feature similarity measurement.Then, we create agents for each group, where each agent decides to select/deselect features in its corresponding group.This design balances the size of action space and number of policy networks and thus makes RFS more effective and efficient.Moreover, to further improve learning efficiency, we propose a hierarchical teacher-like trainer to provide external action advice for agents.This trainer provides advice by intra-group selection and inter-group selection and fuses knowledge from mRMR and decision tree to help agents explore and learn.Finally, we present extensive experiments on real-world datasets to demonstrate the improved performances of our method.
Wei Fan 0010, Kunpeng Liu 0001, Hao Liu 0026, Ahmad Hariri, Dejing Dou, Yanjie Fu
SDM4
2013 Exploring the Mind: Integrating Questionnaires and fMRI
abstract
A new model is developed for joint analysis of ordered, categorical, real and count data. The ordered and categorical data are answers to questionnaires, the (word) count data correspond to the text questions from the questionnaires, and the real data correspond to fMRI responses for each subject. The Bayesian model employs the von Mises distribution in a novel manner to infer sparse graphical models jointly across people, questions, fMRI stimuli and brain region, with this integrated within a new matrix factorization based on latent binary features. The model is compared with simpler alternatives on two real datasets. We also demonstrate the ability to predict the response of the brain to visual stimuli (as measured by fMRI), based on knowledge of how the associated person answered classical questionnaires.
Esther Salazar, Ryan Bogdan, Adam Gorka, Ahmad Hariri, Lawrence Carin
ICML (2)4