Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Tue Herlau
dblp:137/3322
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
4as first author
2since 2021 · last 2022
0000-0001-7288-6953ORCID · verified
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 4 first-author · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
3 papers |
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 49% Representation and self-supervised learning · 26% Planning, search and constraint satisfaction · 11% |
Topics — the 9 heaviest of 11, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
causal representation learning |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Reinforcement Learning of Causal Variables Using Mediation Analysis · AAAI 2022 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › bayesian inference
bayesian nonparametric model |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Completely random measures for modelling block-structured sparse networks · NIPS 2016 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › bayesian inference › bayesian nonparametric model
completely random measures |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Completely random measures for modelling block-structured sparse networks · NIPS 2016 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
causal reasoning |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | Reinforcement Learning of Causal Variables Using Mediation Analysis · AAAI 2022 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › causal inference › causal effect estimation
mediation analysis |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | Reinforcement Learning of Causal Variables Using Mediation Analysis · AAAI 2022 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models › graphical models
bayesian network |
0.2 | 1 | 2013 | Modeling Temporal Evolution and Multiscale Structure in Networks · ICML (3) 2013 |
Machine learning › Graph learning › dynamic graph learning
dynamic graph modeling |
0.2 | 1 | 2013 | Modeling Temporal Evolution and Multiscale Structure in Networks · ICML (3) 2013 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction
temporal network |
0.2 | 1 | 2013 | Modeling Temporal Evolution and Multiscale Structure in Networks · ICML (3) 2013 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction › constraint satisfaction
interchangeability |
0.1 | 1 | 2016 | Completely random measures for modelling block-structured sparse networks · NIPS 2016 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
mediation analysis · 0.6bellman equation generalization · 0.6kallenberg exchangeability · 0.2collapsed sampling · 0.2gibbs fragmentation tree · 0.2change-point model · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | Reinforcement Learning of Causal Variables Using Mediation AnalysisabstractWe consider the problem of acquiring causal representations and concepts in a reinforcement learning setting. Our approach defines a causal variable as being both manipulable by a policy, and able to predict the outcome. We thereby obtain a parsimonious causal graph in which interventions occur at the level of policies. The approach avoids defining a generative model of the data, prior pre-processing, or learning the transition kernel of the Markov decision process. Instead, causal variables and policies are determined by maximizing a new optimization target inspired by mediation analysis, which differs from the expected return. The maximization is accomplished using a generalization of Bellman's equation which is shown to converge, and the method finds meaningful causal representations in a simulated environment. Tue Herlau, Rasmus Larsen 0001 |
AAAI | 1 |
| 2022 | Active learning of causal probability treesabstractThe past two decades have seen a growing interest in combining causal information, commonly represented using causal graphs, with machine learning models. Probability trees provide a simple yet powerful alternative representation of causal information. They enable both computation of intervention and counterfactuals, and are strictly more general, since they allow context-dependent causal dependencies. Here we present a Bayesian method for learning probability trees from a combination of interventional and observational data. The method quantifies the expected information gain from an intervention, and selects the interventions with the largest gain. We demonstrate the efficiency of the method on simulated and real data. An effective method for learning probability trees on a limited interventional budget will greatly expand their applicability. Tue Herlau |
ICMLA | 1 |
| 2016 | Completely random measures for modelling block-structured sparse networksabstractStatistical methods for network data often parameterize the edge-probability by attributing latent traits such as block structure to the vertices and assume exchangeability in the sense of the Aldous-Hoover representation theorem. These assumptions are however incompatible with traits found in real-world networks such as a power-law degree-distribution. Recently, Caron & Fox (2014) proposed the use of a different notion of exchangeability after Kallenberg (2005) and obtained a network model which permits edge-inhomogeneity, such as a power-law degree-distribution whilst retaining desirable statistical properties. However, this model does not capture latent vertex traits such as block-structure. In this work we re-introduce the use of block-structure for network models obeying Kallenberg’s notion of exchangeability and thereby obtain a collapsed model which both admits the inference of block-structure and edge inhomogeneity. We derive a simple expression for the likelihood and an efficient sampling method. The obtained model is not significantly more difficult to implement than existing approaches to block-modelling and performs well on real network datasets. Tue Herlau, Mikkel N. Schmidt, Morten Mørup |
NIPS | 1 |
| 2013 | Modeling Temporal Evolution and Multiscale Structure in NetworksabstractMany real-world networks exhibit both temporal evolution and multiscale structure. We propose a model for temporally correlated multifurcating hierarchies in complex networks which jointly capture both effects. We use the Gibbs fragmentation tree as prior over multifurcating trees and a change-point model to account for the temporal evolution of each vertex. We demonstrate that our model is able to infer time-varying multiscale structure in synthetic as well as three real world time-evolving complex networks. Our modeling of the temporal evolution of hierarchies brings new insights into the changing roles and position of entities and possibilities for better understanding these dynamic complex systems. Tue Herlau, Morten Mørup, Mikkel N. Schmidt |
ICML (3) | 1 |